· Private foundation
Jephson Educational Trust #2 Xxxxx1004
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k14 grants · $68k
- $10k–50k21 grants · $292k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $127k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KEUKA COLLEGE | $127,000 |
| Metropolitan Opera Association | $30,000 |
| New York Philharmonic- Symphony Society | $20,000 |
| Long Trail School Inc | $20,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND | $20,000 |
| American Composers Orchestra Inc | $20,000 |
| Bach Choir of Bethlehem | $17,500 |
| Norwich University | $15,000 |
| NATIONAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE | $15,000 |
| Seeing Eye | $14,400 |
| Midland Adult Services Inc | $10,000 |
| UNION COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY | $10,000 |
| Elmira College | $10,000 |
| New York Public Library | $10,000 |
| NEW ENGLAND CONSERVATORY OF | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $80k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +11% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
51 repeat relationships — 32 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- KCKEUKA COLLEGE2× · 2024–2025 · $227k · revenue +3%
- ACAMERICAN COMPOSERS ORCHESTRA INC8× · 2018–2025 · $140k · revenue +21%
- MSMANHATTAN SCHOOL OF MUSIC7× · 2018–2024 · $105k · revenue +40%
Funded once
- RIRochester Institute for Technologyone grant, 2021 · $15k
- UCUNION COLLEGEone grant, 2024 · $10k
- MMMARYMOUNT MANHATTAN COLLEGEone grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue -2%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship
As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
At sarah lawrence college, our mission is to graduate citizens of the world who are diverse in every definition of the word, who take intellectual and creative risks, and who are able to focus exceptional intellectual discipline (continued…
The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.
Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.
Macalester is committed to being a preeminent liberal arts college with an educational program known for its high standards for scholarship and its special emphasis on internationalism, multiculturalism, and service to society.
See detailed description of organization's primary mission provided on schedule o
Hillsdale college is a private liberal arts college with approximately 1,500 students. founded in 1844, the college remains, in the words of its articles of association, "grateful to god for the inestimable blessings resulting from the…
Mcdaniel college is a diverse student-centered community committed to excellence in the liberal arts & sciences and professional studies with careful mentoring and attention to the individual. mcdaniel changes lives. we challenge students…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Berklee College of Music Inc and the most unlike its peers is Blue Rock School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 74 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CAZENOVIA COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Metropolitan Opera Association Inc ↗
- Who funds KEUKA COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds LONG TRAIL SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN COMPOSERS ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds BACH CHOIR OF BETHLEHEM ↗
- Who funds MANHATTAN SCHOOL OF MUSIC ↗
- Who funds INTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds ALICE LLOYD COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds THE SEEING EYE INC ↗
- Who funds THE CLARKE SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF CLARKE SCHOOLS FOR HEARING AND SPEECH ↗
- Who funds MIDLAND ADULT SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds The Carnegie Hall Society Inc ↗
- Who funds Museum of Modern Art ↗
- Who funds The New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations ↗
- Who funds WELLS COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds ELMIRA COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds ST LUKES CHAMBER ENSEMBLE INC ↗
- Who funds PREP FOR PREP ↗
- Who funds Norwich University ↗
- Who funds CURTIS INSTITUTE OF MUSIC ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK YOUTH SYMPHONY INC ↗
- Who funds THE CAMPHILL SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds BLUE ROCK SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds MANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds MASTERVOICES INC ↗
- Who funds BERKLEE COLLEGE OF MUSIC INC ↗
- Who funds THE NAUMBURG ORCHESTRAL CONCERTS INC ↗
- Who funds Mount Saint Mary College ↗
- Who funds JBI INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jephson Educational Trust #1 Xxxxx0006 · Ibm International Foundation · Booth Ferris Foundation Xxxxx4008 · JM McDonald Foundation Inc · Verizon Foundation · American Express Foundation · Wilkes-Desmond Educational Foundation · Gazin Norbert L Education Pfdn 101-0628960 · Jessie H Baker Educational Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Fred L Emerson Foundation Inc · Central New York Community Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jephson Educational Trust #2 Xxxxx1004 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Norwich University — 14% of income from government
- Trustees of Tufts College — 11% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University — 11% of income from government
- Midland Adult Services Inc — 7% of income from government
- Vermont Law School — 1% of income from government
- The Clarke School for the Deaf Clarke Schools for Hearing and Speech — 1% of income from government
- Sacred Heart University Incorporated — 0% of income from government
- The Seeing Eye Inc — 0% of income from government
- Berklee College of Music Inc — 0% of income from government
- Long Trail School — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Jephson Educational Trust #2 Xxxxx1004?
Find your warmest path to Jephson Educational Trust #2 Xxxxx1004 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.