· Private foundation
Jessie H Baker Educational Fund
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k25 grants · $82k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $53k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SUNY BROOME COMMUNITY COLLEGE | $30,023 |
| BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY | $23,114 |
| UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO | $6,100 |
| SUNY CORTLAND | $6,100 |
| ST BONAVENTURE UNIVERSITY | $3,050 |
| UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAVEN | $3,050 |
| ROBERTS WESLEYAN COLLEGE | $3,050 |
| SUNY FREDONIA | $3,050 |
| FRANCISCAN UNIVERSITY | $3,050 |
| CORNELL UNIVERSITY | $3,050 |
| SUNY ESF | $3,050 |
| BOSTON UNIVERSITY | $3,050 |
| LOCK HAVEN UNIVERSITY | $3,050 |
| ALFRED STATE COLLEGE | $3,050 |
| ECCLESIA COLLEGE | $3,050 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
58 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2025, 35 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY7× · 2018–2024 · $39k · revenue +40%- SJST JOHN FISHER UNIVERSITY7× · 2018–2024 · $33k · revenue +29%
- LMLe Moyne College6× · 2018–2025 · $29k · revenue +11%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2018 · $6k
- PSPENN STATE UNIVERSITYone grant, 2024 · $5k
- SNSUNY NEW PALTZone grant, 2019 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…
At Roger Williams University, students are prepared to be thinkers and doers ready to solve challenging problems with innovative solutions. RWU offers robust offerings of undergraduate, graduate and professional programs across eight…
Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…
As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.
Molloy university, an independent catholic university, rooted in the dominican tradition of study, spirituality, service, and community, is committed to academic excellence with respect for each person. through transformative education,…
Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.
Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…
Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…
Xavier is a jesuit catholic university rooted in the liberal arts tradition. our mission is to educate each student intellectually, morally, and spiritually. we create learning opportunities through rigorous academic and professional…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Syracuse University and the most unlike its peers is College of St Joseph the Worker Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 75 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
49 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 49 of the 107 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds ST JOHN FISHER UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Le Moyne College ↗
- Who funds ITHACA COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds FRANCISCAN UNIVERSITY OF STEUBENVILLE ↗
- Who funds ST BONAVENTURE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Marywood University ↗
- Who funds Rochester Institute of Technology ↗
- Who funds Cornell University ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CAZENOVIA COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds BARNARD COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds HOBART AND WILLIAM SMITH COLLEGES ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN OHIO ↗
- Who funds CLARKS SUMMIT UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds ELMIRA COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds NAZARETH UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Hartwick College ↗
- Who funds THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute ↗
- Who funds MARIST UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds ROBERTS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Central New York Community Foundation Inc · Gazin Norbert L Education Pfdn 101-0628960 · JM McDonald Foundation Inc · Gunglach Scho Tr · King Scholarship Fund · Verizon Foundation · E Brink Trust Uw Scholarship Fund · Wilkes-Desmond Educational Foundation · Fred L Emerson Foundation Inc · Tulsa Community Foundation · Conrad H & Anna B Gillen Scholarship Fund · Louis Henry Gross Sponsorship Fdn
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jessie H Baker Educational Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
- University of New Haven — 1% of income from government
- The University of Tampa Incorporated — 0% of income from government
- Pensacola Christian College Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.