Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jensen Private Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$3.0M
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$3.0MPhilanthropy$2.1MArts & Culture$93kEducation$49kReligion$45kHuman Services$36kCommunity Improvement$25kCivil Rights$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $63k
  • $250k+1 grant · $3.0M
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$6.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IHC STEAD FAMILY CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$2,986,642
MUSCATINE ART CENTER SUPPORT FOUND$25,000
IHC STEAD FAMILY CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$15,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER MUS$13,000
GMG SCHOOL FOUNDATION$10,000
MUSCATINE COMMUNITY YMCA$5,000
ZION LUTHERAN CHURCH$5,000
MUSCATINE CHARTIES INC$4,645
MUSCATINE CENTER FOR SOCIAL ACTION$2,500
CROSSROADS MUSCATINE$1,000
HISTORIC MUSCATINE$1,000
FRIENDS OF MUSCATINE ART CENTER$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
FLICKINGER LEARNING CENTER$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $39k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MUSCATINE COMMUNITY YMCA: $10k → 12%MUSCATINE COMMUNITY YMCA: $6k → 12%MUSCATINE COMMUNITY YMCA: $5k → 12%MUSCATINE COMMUNITY YMCA: $5k → 12%MUSCATINE COMMUNITY YMCA: $5k → 12%MUSCATINE COMMUNITY YMCA: $5k → 12%FLICKINGER LEARNING CENTER: $1k → 12%FLICKINGER LEARNING CENTER: $1k → 12%FLICKINGER LEARNING CENTER: $1k → 12%FLICKINGER LEARNING CENTER: $100 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

9%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$306k · 11 repeat orgs$3.0M to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
6

Total granted

$306k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-67%
-42%

Still filing today

36%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 2% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEmploymentHealthPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF MUSCATINE ART CENTER INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $47k
  • GS
    GMG SCHOOL FOUNDATION
    4× · 2019–2025 · $45k
  • ZL
    ZION LUTHERAN CHURCH
    9× · 2017–2025 · $45k

Funded once

  • MC
    MUSCATINE COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • DC
    DIVERSITY CENTER OF IOWA
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • CO
    CITY OF HOPE
    one grant, 2019 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Muscatine Community College Foundation

Providing scholarships to students attending muscatine community college.

Education
2
Muscatine Safe Streets Inc

To deter and reduce crime, especially juvenile delinquency and gang activity, through organized neighborhoods by improving community living conditions and strengthening families.

—
3
Muscatine - Beyond 2000

Improve the apperance of the city of muscatine

—
4
Muscatine Welfare Association

Provide housing opportunities for persons with disabilities

Housing & Shelter
5
Mutchler Community Center

Community recreation center

Recreation & Sports
6
Muscatine Humane Society Inc

Care of cats and dogs

Animals
7
United Way of Muscatine Iowa

Improve lives by mobilizing the caring power of the muscatine community to advance the common good.

—
8
Muscatine Christian Academy

Dedicated to developing students who desire to love god and others, and are academically prepared for gods unique plan for their lives.

Education
9
Friends of the Muscatine Ffa

Career development events-participation by members in a broad range of events related to agriculture.

Education
10
Muscatine Chamber of Commerce Foundation

The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively for charitable, scientific, literary, and education purposes, all within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code (or its successor statute) and applicable…

Philanthropy
11
Bridges Community Services Inc

To develop, coordinate, and proivde housing, social services, and educational programs for low income and moderate income residents of muncie, indiana.

—
12
Muskingum County Center for Seniors

To provide services to qualifying senior citizens of muskingum county.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Greater Muscatine; the most unlike its peers is Jbr Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/9
Grantees still filing
3/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

IHC STEAD FAMILY CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $3,001,642 · OtherIHC STEAD FAMILY CHILDRENS HOSPITAL+13 more: $205,400 · Other+13 moreCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER MUSCATINE: $2,044,200 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER MUSCATINE+1 more: $41,145 · PhilanthropyMUSCATINE COMMUNITY Y: $36,000 · Human ServicesFLICKINGER LEARNING CENTER: $3,100 · Human ServicesMUSCATINE CENTER FOR SOCIAL ACTION: $24,200 · Community ImprovementCROSSROADS INC: $1,000 · EmploymentJBR FOUNDATION: $250 · Health
Other$3,207,042Philanthropy$2,085,345Human Services$39,100Community Improvement$24,200Employment$1,000Health$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER MUSCATINE: $2,044,200 over 9y, 6.6% of budgetMUSCATINE CHARITIES INC: $41,145 over 8y, 5.4% of budgetMUSCATINE COMMUNITY Y: $36,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetMUSCATINE CENTER FOR SOCIAL ACTION: $24,200 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetHISTORIC MUSCATINE INC: $5,500 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetFLICKINGER LEARNING CENTER: $3,100 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetSENIOR RESOURCES INC: $300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJBR FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER MUSCATINE ↗
  • Who funds MUSCATINE CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSCATINE COMMUNITY Y ↗
  • Who funds MUSCATINE CENTER FOR SOCIAL ACTION ↗
  • Who funds HISTORIC MUSCATINE INC ↗
  • Who funds FLICKINGER LEARNING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS INC ↗
  • Who funds SENIOR RESOURCES INC ↗
  • Who funds JBR FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

HNI Charitable FoundationIA20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: HNI Charitable Foundation · Community Foundation of Greater Muscatine · The Howe Foundation · KENT CORPORATION CHARITABLE FOUNDATION fka KENT-STEIN FOUNDATION · New Hope Foundation · Holthues Trust · United Way of Muscatine Iowa · Muscatine Charities Inc · Stanley Consultants Charitable Foundation · Quad Cities Golf Classic Charitable Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jensen Private Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jensen Private Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Jensen Private Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Jensen Private Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jensen Private’s filings →

    More from the funding graph