Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jefferson Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
219
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$345k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$28MHuman Services$12MFood & Nutrition$4.7MEducation$3.3MYouth Development$1.9MReligion$1.5MPublic Safety & Disaster$1.3MCrime & Legal$1.2MOther$0
02FY2024 · 219 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k32 grants · $186k
  • $10k–50k136 grants · $2.9M
  • $50k–250k49 grants · $4.0M
  • $250k+2 grants · $658k
$22,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$197M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHESTNUT HEALTH SYSTEMS$345,488
MERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION JEFFERSON$312,500
SAINT LOUIS COUNSELING$200,000
JEFFERSON COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT$175,000
UPWARD SMILES INC$150,000
JEFFERSON COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC$125,000
CHADS COALITION FOR MENTAL HEALTH$120,000
JEFFERSON COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC$110,490
PONY BIRD INC$108,912
Individual grant recipient$108,300
AGING AHEAD$105,000
PROMISE COMMUNITY HOMES$100,000
OZARK FOOD PANTRY$100,000
THE CURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI$100,000
DISABILITY RESOURCE ASSOCIATION INC$100,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $8.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 64% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES AND SERVICES: $60k → 10%SUNNYHILL INC: $85k → 11%OATS INC: $190k → 17%FAMILYFORWARD: $122k → 21%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES AND SERVICES: $60k → 10%SUNNYHILL INC: $65k → 11%OATS INC: $100k → 17%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES AND SERVICES: $60k → 10%SUNNYHILL INC: $60k → 11%OATS INC: $100k → 17%FAMILYFORWARD: $94k → 21%OATS INC: $100k → 17%OATS INC: $100k → 17%NURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $55k → 11%CHAMPION LIFE FOUNDATION INC: $68k → 9%JEFFERSON COUNTY RESCUE MISSION: $67k → 9%JEFFERSON COUNTY RESCUE MISSION: $54k → 9%THE COVERING HOUSE: $75k → 11%FEED MY PEOPLE: $65k → 11%FEED MY PEOPLE: $58k → 11%DISABILITY RESOURCE ASSOCIATION INC: $100k → 9%DISABILITY RESOURCE ASSOCIATION INC: $100k → 9%DISABILITY RESOURCE ASSOCIATION INC: $100k → 9%DISABILITY RESOURCE ASSOCIATION INC: $100k → 9%DISABILITY RESOURCE ASSOCIATION INC: $100k → 9%DISABILITY RESOURCE ASSOCIATION INC: $100k → 9%DISABILITY RESOURCE ASSOCIATION INC: $100k → 9%CHRISTIAN FAMILY SERVICES: $69k → 11%DISABILITY RESOURCE ASSOCIATION INC: $100k → 9%DISABILITY RESOURCE ASSOCIATION INC: $95k → 9%CHRISTIAN FAMILY SERVICES: $55k → 11%CHRISTIAN FAMILY SERVICES: $55k → 11%DISABILITY RESOURCE ASSOCIATION INC: $76k → 9%DISABILITY RESOURCE ASSOCIATION INC: $65k → 9%DISABILITY RESOURCE ASSOCIATION INC: $60k → 9%DISABILITY RESOURCE ASSOCIATION INC: $60k → 9%BRENDEN'S FRIDAY BACKPACK PROGRAM INC: $55k → 9%ST LOUIS AREA DIAPER BANK: $65k → 11%PROMISE COMMUNITY HOMES: $100k → 11%RAINBOW VILLAGE: $100k → 11%RAINBOW VILLAGE: $75k → 11%RAINBOW VILLAGE: $75k → 11%RAINBOW VILLAGE: $75k → 11%PROMISE COMMUNITY HOMES: $62k → 11%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES AND SERVICES: $60k → 11%ANGELS' ARMS: $100k → 11%ANGELS' ARMS: $75k → 11%GET HEALTHY DESOTO: $66k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of Jefferson Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 95% of the giving stays in MO; by stated purpose, 87%.

Jefferson Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$57M · 229 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against -20% for those funded once.

229 repeat relationships: 172 still active in FY2024, 57 since wound down; 26 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

229
53

Total granted

$57M
$919k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
-20%

Still filing today

49%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $486k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MH
    MERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION JEFFERSON
    8× · 2017–2024 · $4.3M · revenue +202% · 65% of their budget
  • CH
    CHESTNUT HEALTH SYSTEMS INC
    4× · 2019–2023 · $2.8M · revenue +80%
  • SL
    SAINT LOUIS COUNSELING INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.6M · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • FR
    FESTUS RVI SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • JC
    JEFFERSON COUNTY (MO) 9-1-1 DISPATCH
    one grant, 2019 · $73k
  • PC
    PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES AND SERVICES OF MISSOURI
    one grant, 2017 · $60k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Family Advocacy and Community Training Inc

Enhance the opportunities and quality of life for children and youth with disabilities. the organization achieves this objective through parent training, emotional support, direct advocacy, community education, self-advocacy and navigation…

—
2
Sts Joachim and Ann Care Service

To provide integrated services such as financial assistance, case management, and referrals to families and individuals of all ages to reduce the propensity for homelessness, abuse and neglect, and to provide the tools to achieve…

—
3
St Louis Arc Inc

To empower people with intellectual and developmental disabilities and their families to lead better lives by providing a lifetime of high-quality services, family support and advocacy.

Human Services
4
Linkability Inc

Provide Case Management for people with developmental disabilities such as autism services, respite care, crisis intervention, self directed services, and Medicaid Home and Cummunity Based Waiver programs.

Human Services
5
Jewish Family Services of St Louis

Inspired by the jewish tradition to make the world a better place, jfs helps and supports people in need to meet their challenges. through a comprehensive range of services, including a food pantry, older adult services, clinical services,…

Human Services
6
Jefferson Community Counseling Cent Dba Discovery Behavioral Healthcare

Discovery behavioral healthcare is a community based health treatment center dedicated to providing state of the art services to foster recovery and resilience in an accessible, respective and caring environment.

Youth Development
7
North Central Missouri Mental Health Center

Nc mo mental health center delivers high quality trauma-informed behavioral health services in a caring and compassionate atmosphere that promotes dignity, builds on natural supports, encourages consumer choice, embraces cultural…

Health
8
St Martin's Child Center

Providing day care services to infants and children of low income families in northern st. louis county, missouri

—
9
Creative Concepts for Living Inc

Assist individuals with developmental disabilities in achieving the goal of living in their community of choice with the necessary support

Human Services
10
Peter & Paul Community Services Inc

We walk with people facing homelessness on their journey to lifelong stability.

Housing & Shelter
11
Child Safe of Central Missouri Inc

Child safe of central missouri's mission is to respond to and prevent child abuse by providing advocacy, support, and resources to children who are alleged victims of abuse and other traumatic crimes, and to their non-offending family…

Crime & Legal
12
Magdala House

To provide outpatient and residential rehabilitative services to individuals and families referred by various government agencies. these individuals include substance abusers, intellectually disabled, developmentally disabled, and abused…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Home Society of Missouri; the most unlike its peers is Kinsey Volunteer Fire Dept. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

132 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 132 of the 308 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

16
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
38
Early backer (in before they grew)
127/132
Grantees still filing
94/132
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION JEFFERSON: $4,314,814 · OtherMERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION JEFFERSONJEFFERSON COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT: $3,704,686 · OtherJEFFERSON COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENTSAINT LOUIS COUNSELING INC: $2,641,461 · OtherSAINT LOUIS COUNSELING INCCHESTNUT HEALTH SYSTEMS: $1,345,488 · Other+135 more: $22,132,197 · Other+135 moreDISABILITY RESOURCE ASSOCIATION INC: $1,490,890 · Human ServicesDISABILITY RESOURCE…PONY BIRD INC: $1,351,563 · Human ServicesPONY BIRD INCTHE COVERING HOUSE: $791,557 · Human ServicesTHE COVERING HOUSEOATS INC: $616,000 · Human ServicesOATS INCCHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $487,411 · Human ServicesSUNNYHILL INC: $466,972 · Human ServicesNURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $365,000 · Human ServicesChristian Family Services: $361,450 · Human ServicesFEED MY PEOPLE: $358,070 · Human Services+23 more: $3,564,294 · Human Services+23 moreCHESTNUT HEALTH SYSTEMS INC: $2,800,000 · HealthCHESTNUT HEALTH SY…UPWARD SMILES INC: $2,547,795 · HealthUPWARD SMILES INCProvident Inc: $962,450 · HealthProvident IncCHADS COALITION FOR MENTAL HEALTH: $575,000 · HealthCHADS COALITION FO…PREVENTED: $421,043 · HealthLIV Recovery Sober Living: $345,000 · Health+14 more: $1,479,406 · Health+14 moreTHE PEACE PANTRY: $705,000 · Food & NutritionOzark Food Pantry: $334,089 · Food & NutritionOPERATION FOOD SEARCH INC: $291,177 · Food & NutritionFOOD OUTREACH INC: $212,280 · Food & NutritionJEFFERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP: $1,047,380 · Community ImprovementCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF JEFFERSON COUNTY: $357,219 · Civil RightsMaryville University - St Louis: $155,137 · EducationC-6 EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $100,000 · EducationTHE DENTAL HEALTH THEATRE INC: $88,750 · Education
Other$34,138,646Human Services$9,853,207Health$9,130,694Food & Nutrition$1,542,546Community Improvement$1,047,380Civil Rights$357,219Education$343,887

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION JEFFERSON: $4,314,814 over 8y, 65% of budgetCHESTNUT HEALTH SYSTEMS INC: $2,800,000 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetSAINT LOUIS COUNSELING INC: $2,641,461 over 8y, 11% of budgetUPWARD SMILES INC: $2,547,795 over 8y, 16% of budgetDISABILITY RESOURCE ASSOCIATION INC: $1,490,890 over 8y, 3.7% of budgetPONY BIRD INC: $1,351,563 over 8y, 4.2% of budgetJEFFERSON COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $1,057,240 over 8y, 20% of budgetJEFFERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP: $1,047,380 over 8y, 20% of budgetProvident Inc: $962,450 over 7y, 3.9% of budgetTHE COVERING HOUSE: $791,557 over 8y, 15% of budgetTHE PEACE PANTRY: $705,000 over 7y, 5.0% of budgetST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC: $697,768 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetTHE SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION OF ST LOUIS: $648,060 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetOATS INC: $616,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetCHADS COALITION FOR MENTAL HEALTH: $575,000 over 8y, 6.2% of budgetOUR LITTLE HAVEN: $512,200 over 8y, 2.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $487,411 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetSUNNYHILL INC: $466,972 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetCENTER FOR HEARING & SPEECH: $433,011 over 8y, 3.5% of budgetPREVENTED: $421,043 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetAlive Inc: $405,283 over 8y, 3.6% of budgetNURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $365,000 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetChristian Family Services: $361,450 over 7y, 7.9% of budgetFEED MY PEOPLE: $358,070 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF JEFFERSON COUNTY: $357,219 over 8y, 33% of budgetLIV Recovery Sober Living: $345,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetGREAT CIRCLE: $341,748 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetOzark Food Pantry: $334,089 over 8y, 69% of budgetLUTHERAN FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF MISSOURI: $330,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetRAINBOW VILLAGE INC: $325,000 over 4y, 28% of budgetJEFFERSON COUNTY RESCUE MISSION INC: $302,601 over 8y, 28% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN MISSOURI INC: $296,709 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetOPERATION FOOD SEARCH INC: $291,177 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTEEN CHALLENGE OF ST LOUIS INC: $278,000 over 6y, 11% of budgetBRENDENS FRIDAY BACK PACK PROGRAM: $275,000 over 8y, 27% of budgetGOOD SHEPHERD CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $275,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN OF ST LOUIS: $255,000 over 8y, 4.2% of budgetCRIMINAL JUSTICE MINISTRY: $250,000 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetHEROES CARE INC: $250,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetST LOUIS CRISIS NURSERY: $249,600 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES: $240,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetHILLSBORO FOOD PANTRY: $236,915 over 8y, 39% of budgetTHE ST LOUIS BEREAVEMENT CENTER FOR YOUNG PEOPLE: $221,836 over 8y, 4.4% of budgetST LOUIS HEALTH EQUIPMENT LENDING PROGRAM INC: $220,000 over 7y, 26% of budgetST LOUIS AREA DIAPER BANK: $215,000 over 6y, 6.3% of budgetANGELS' ARMS: $215,000 over 4y, 6.8% of budgetFOOD OUTREACH INC: $212,280 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetARNOLD FOOD PANTRY: $211,649 over 8y, 2.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION JEFFERSON ↗
  • Who funds CHESTNUT HEALTH SYSTEMS INC ↗
  • Who funds SAINT LOUIS COUNSELING INC ↗
  • Who funds UPWARD SMILES INC ↗
  • Who funds DISABILITY RESOURCE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PONY BIRD INC ↗
  • Who funds JEFFERSON COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JEFFERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds Provident Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE COVERING HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds THE PEACE PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION OF ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds OATS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHADS COALITION FOR MENTAL HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds OUR LITTLE HAVEN ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF MISSOURI ↗
  • Who funds SUNNYHILL INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR HEARING & SPEECH ↗
  • Who funds PREVENTED ↗
  • Who funds Alive Inc ↗
  • Who funds NURSES FOR NEWBORNS ↗
  • Who funds Christian Family Services ↗
  • Who funds FEED MY PEOPLE ↗
  • Who funds COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF JEFFERSON COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds LIV Recovery Sober Living ↗
  • Who funds GREAT CIRCLE ↗
  • Who funds Ozark Food Pantry ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF MISSOURI ↗
  • Who funds RAINBOW VILLAGE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Foundation IncMO87.3× affinity58 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation · Moneta Group Charitable Foundation · Pott Foundation · Youthbridge Community Foundation · World Wide Technology Foundation · Brown Dana Charitable Trust · East Missouri Foundation · Norman J Stupp Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jefferson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jefferson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    38report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Jefferson Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Jefferson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 308 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jefferson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph