Skip to content
Jeanne & Richard Kaskey Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Jeanne & Richard Kaskey Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$335k
Granted FY2025still arriving
32
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$588kInternational$150kEducation$135kHuman Services$105kScience & Tech$65kReligion$60kFood & Nutrition$45kYouth Development$45kOther$0
02FY2025 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k21 grants · $105k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $80k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $150k
$5,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$8.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Thomas Jefferson University$50,000
LIVING BEYOND BREAST CANCER$50,000
ST LUKE'S HEALTH NETWORK INC$50,000
MILTON & BETTY KATZ JCC$10,000
Friends of the Israel Defense Forces$10,000
American Friends of the Israel$10,000
Stand With Us$10,000
American Friends of Magen David Adom$10,000
GIFT OF LIFE MARROW REGISTRY$10,000
Stephen Siller Tunnel to Towers$10,000
American Brain Foundation$10,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Jewish Family Services of Atlantic$5,000
TEMPLE JUDEA OF BUCKS COUNTY$5,000
American Friends of Leket Israel$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $85k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 18% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Guiding Eyes for the Blind: $5k → 9%Guiding Eyes for the Blind: $5k → 9%Guiding Eyes for the Blind: $5k → 9%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE: $20k → 6%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE: $5k → 6%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE: $5k → 6%JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $10k → 7%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE: $5k → 6%JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $5k → 7%Jewish Family and Children's Service of: $5k → 7%JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $5k → 7%Jewish Family and Children's Service of: $5k → 7%JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $5k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
PA
NJ
CT
CA
MD
KS
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 5% of Jeanne & Richard Kaskey Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 78% of the giving stays in PA; by stated purpose, 72%.

Jeanne & Richard Kaskey Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 7.6% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 34 repeat orgs$73k to everyone else

34 repeat relationships: 28 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
11

Total granted

$1.2M
$53k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
+44%

Still filing today

56%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationInternationalPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SL
    ST LUKE'S HEALTH NETWORK INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $200k · revenue +24%
  • LB
    LIVING BEYOND BREAST CANCER
    4× · 2022–2025 · $200k · revenue +47%
  • IG
    ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND
    4× · 2022–2025 · $35k · revenue +109%

Funded once

  • RA
    RAYMOND AND RUTH PERELMAN JEWISH DAY SCHOOLgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +44%
  • FC
    Friendship Circle of Greater Fort
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • HO
    HOUSE OF HOPE & RESTORATION
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +136%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
2
Hadassah the Women's Zionist Org of America Inc

Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…

Community Improvement
3
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
4
The Jerusalem Connection
—
5
United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc

Uja-federation of new york (uja) cares for jews everywhere and new yorkers of all backgrounds, responds to crises close to home and far away, and shapes the jewish future. through strategic grantmaking, uja provides funding and resources…

Philanthropy
6
American Friends of Hebrew University Inc

Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.

International
7
National Council of Jewish Women Inc Jersey Hills Section
—
8
Young Judaea Global Inc

Young judaea is a diverse community that educates and empowers jewish youth to deeply engage with israel and to lead positive change for the jewish people, israel and the world.

Education
9
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
10
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
11
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
12
Physicians for Palestine
Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family & Children's Service of Greater Philadelphia; the most unlike its peers is House of Hope & Restoration. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/31
Grantees still filing
18/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST LUKE'S HEALTH NETWORK INC: $200,000 · HealthST LUKE'S HEALTH NETWORK INCLIVING BEYOND BREAST CANCER: $200,000 · HealthLIVING BEYOND BREAST CANCERGIFT OF LIFE MARROW REGISTRY INC: $35,000 · HealthGIFT OF LIFE MARROW REGISTRY INCAMERICAN BRAIN FOUNDATION: $30,000 · HealthAMERICAN BRAIN FOUNDATION+5 more: $25,000 · HealthJEFFERSON: $100,000 · OtherJEFFERSONAmerican Friends of the Israel: $50,000 · OtherAmerican Friends of the IsraelMILTON & BETTY KATZ JCC: $40,000 · OtherMILTON & BETTY KATZ JCCJEWISH BRAILLE INSTITUTE: $25,000 · OtherJEWISH BRAILLE INSTITUTEIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPENN HILLEL: $25,000 · OtherPENN HILLELTEMPLE JUDEA OF BUCKS COUNTY INC: $20,000 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $20,000 · OtherLighthouse Guild: $17,500 · Other+17 more: $143,000 · Other+17 moreTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $100,000 · EducationTHOMAS JEFF…STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $15,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SIL…YOUTH RENEWAL FUND: $15,000 · EducationYOUTH RENEW…WHARTON GRADUATE ASSOCIATION: $5,000 · Education+1 more: $1 · EducationAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $30,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $30,000 · InternationalISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $30,000 · InternationalISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $35,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $25,000 · Human ServicesGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $10,000 · Human ServicesEXPERIENCE CAMPS: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $5,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICA ISRAEL DEMOCRACY COALITION: $5,000 · Philanthropy
Health$490,000Other$465,500Education$135,001International$90,000Human Services$85,000Youth Development$20,000Philanthropy$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST LUKE'S HEALTH NETWORK INC: $200,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLIVING BEYOND BREAST CANCER: $200,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $35,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetGIFT OF LIFE MARROW REGISTRY INC: $35,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN BRAIN FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $25,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetEXPERIENCE CAMPS: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH RENEWAL FUND: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Women International: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF ATLANTIC COUNTY INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetA WOMAN'S PLACE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAYMOND AND RUTH PERELMAN JEWISH DAY SCHOOL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWHARTON GRADUATE ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CAREER WARDROBE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMOMENTUM UNLIMITED INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE FOR HENRY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE PINK AGENDA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICA ISRAEL DEMOCRACY COALITION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $1 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropi…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
National Philanthropic TrustPA8.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jeanne & Richard Kaskey Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jeanne & Richard Kaskey Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Jewish Family Services of Atlantic County Inc: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jeanne & Richard Kaskey’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home