Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jeanalee and Charles Parsons Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$818k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$143k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$615kYouth Development$560kHuman Services$426kHealth$360kHousing & Shelter$307kReligion$305kPhilanthropy$275kArts & Culture$261kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $199k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $609k
$46,328
Median grant
1
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRANK PHILLIPS FOUNDATION$142,860
OKLAHOMA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY$100,000
B THE LIGHT MISSION FOUNDATION$80,000
CITY COMPASSION$66,188
LIGHTHOUSE OUTREACH$60,000
BARTLESVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION$60,000
OKLAHOMA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY$50,000
RICHARD KANE YMCA OF BARTLESVILLE$50,000
WASHINGTON COUNTY ELDER CARE$46,328
Individual grant recipient$45,000
AGAPE MISSION$38,300
DEWEY ATHLETIC BOOSTERS$25,000
Individual grant recipient$24,336
BARTLESVILLE EDUCATION PROMISE$10,000
K-LIFE OF BARTLESVILLE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $179k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%WASHINGTON COUNTY SENIOR CITIZEN INC: $25k → 14%HOPESTONE CANCER SUPPORT CENTER OF BARTLESVILLE: $25k → 14%WASHINGTON COUNTY ELDER CARE: $46k → 14%WASHINGTON COUNTY ELDER CARE: $29k → 14%WASHINGTON COUNTY ELDER CARE: $17k → 14%GREEN COUNTRY VILLAGE INC: $15k → 14%HOPE CLINIC: $10k → 14%HOPE CLINIC: $10k → 14%HOPE CLINIC: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Jeanalee and Charles Parsons Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 99% of the giving stays in OK; by stated purpose, 95%.

Jeanalee and Charles Parsons Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.5% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.9M · 25 repeat orgs$829k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
29

Total granted

$2.9M
$713k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-2%
-1%

Still filing today

56%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $116k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentEducationReligionArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OW
    OKLAHOMA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2021–2025 · $433k · revenue +13%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE KIDDIE PARK
    2× · 2023–2024 · $200k · revenue +9%
  • LIGHTHOUSE OUTREACH CENTER OF BARTLESVILLE INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $162k · revenue +255%

Funded once

  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NOWATA
    one grant, 2020 · $75k · revenue -62%
  • HI
    HEARTMATTERS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $75k · revenue -23%
  • OT
    ON THE ROCK MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2020 · $75k · revenue +12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Gymnastics Club Inc

To provide gymnastics training to the youth of bartlesville, ok and the surrounding area, teaching discipline, character and physical fitness.

Recreation & Sports
2
Blackwell Oklahoma Community Foundation Inc
—
3
Christ Outreach Oklahoma Inc

Evangelistic preaching the good news of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Missionary and support of missionaries at home and abroad. Praying and counseling with Gods people both at home and in the field. Benevolence to needy.

Religion
4
Going Hard for Christ Community Center Inc

Operate a volunteer community center for disadvantage individuals in tulsa, oklahoma.

Human Services
5
The Good Okc

The Good OKC was created to equip and empower the people of OKC to experience the Kingdom of God in the everyday lives. Far too often we seperate our spiritual lives from our actual life. We believe following Jesus is a 24/7 endeavor and…

Religion
6
Western Oklahoma Family Care Center

The western oklahoma family care center show's god's love by helping families in western oklahoma overcome barrier in their lives in order to help them become contributinng self-supporting citizens

Philanthropy
7
Walworth County Care Center Inc

The mission of the walworth county care center is to provide access to long-term care services in a high quality, compassionate, and dignified manner to residents in walworth county.

Health
8
The Freedom Center of Okc Llc

The Freedom Center of OKC, LLC endeavors to educate, empower and enlighten our nation to reflect on the past, present, and future of the Civil Rights Movement in Oklahoma, and to develop facilities and programs to effect the mission of the…

—
9
Grace Center of Southern Oklahoma

To prevent homelessness and increase self-sufficiency for all people. the center provides educaton and resource assistance in a culturally sensitive, encouraging, and christ-centered environment.

Human Services
10
David E Boone Sr Ministries Inc

A non-profit organization providing transportation, socialization, congregate and/or home delivered meals to senior citizens.

Religion
11
Life Center for Spiritual Growth

Please see schedule o for description

Human Services
12
Churches United for Community Concern

The mission of churches united for community concern is to provide compassionate support to individuals and families needing assistance through contributions of christian and other religious and civic organizations.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Agape Mission of Bartlesville Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Frank Phillips Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
11/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Frank Phillips Foundation Inc: $265,360 · OtherThe Frank Phillips Foundation IncIndividual grant recipient: $220,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPRICE TOWER ARTS CENTER INC: $193,530 · OtherPRICE TOWER ARTS CENTER INCB THE LIGHT MISSION FOUNDATION: $140,000 · OtherB THE LIGHT MISSION FOUNDATIONRICHARD KANE YMCA OF BARTLESVILLE: $82,500 · OtherBARTLESVILLE COMMUNITY CENTER TRUST AUTHORITY: $75,000 · OtherCITY COMPASSION INC: $66,188 · OtherBARTLESVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $100,000 · Other+36 more: $798,866 · Other+36 moreOKLAHOMA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $433,200 · EducationOKLAHOMA WESLEYAN…PATHS TO INDEPENDENCE INC: $157,000 · EducationPATHS TO INDEPEND…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BARTLESVILLE: $332,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NOWATA: $75,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS…HEARTMATTERS INC: $75,000 · Youth DevelopmentHEARTMATTERS I…THE AGAPE MISSION OF BARTLESVILLE INC: $145,839 · ReligionON THE ROCK MINISTRIES INC: $75,000 · ReligionFRIENDS OF THE KIDDIE PARK: $200,000 · Recreation & SportsWASHINGTON COUNTY ELDER CARE INC: $91,428 · Human ServicesHOPESTONE CANCER SUPPORT CENTER: $25,000 · Human ServicesWashington County Senior Citizens: $25,000 · Human ServicesHOPE CLINIC INC: $22,500 · Human ServicesGREEN COUNTRY VILLAGE INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesLIGHTHOUSE OUTREACH CENTER OF BARTLESVILLE INC: $161,700 · Community Improvement
Other$1,941,444Education$590,200Youth Development$482,000Religion$220,839Recreation & Sports$200,000Human Services$178,928Community Improvement$161,700

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOKLAHOMA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $433,200 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BARTLESVILLE: $332,000 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetThe Frank Phillips Foundation Inc: $265,360 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE KIDDIE PARK: $200,000 over 2y, 9.9% of budgetPRICE TOWER ARTS CENTER INC: $193,530 over 2y, 17% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE OUTREACH CENTER OF BARTLESVILLE INC: $161,700 over 5y, 5.6% of budgetPATHS TO INDEPENDENCE INC: $157,000 over 5y, 8.3% of budgetTHE AGAPE MISSION OF BARTLESVILLE INC: $145,839 over 4y, 11% of budgetBARTLESVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetWASHINGTON COUNTY ELDER CARE INC: $91,428 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NOWATA: $75,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetHEARTMATTERS INC: $75,000 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetON THE ROCK MINISTRIES INC: $75,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetTHE JOURNEY HOME INC: $60,000 over 5y, 4.3% of budgetK-LIFE OF BARTLESVILLE INC: $53,500 over 6y, 6.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER OF SE KANSAS INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHEROKEE AREA COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $31,945 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetBARTLESVILLE LIONS CHARITIES INC: $30,000 over 1y, 35% of budgetWESTSIDE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION: $28,600 over 1y, 22% of budgetDEWEY ATHLETIC BOOSTERS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetHOPESTONE CANCER SUPPORT CENTER: $25,000 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetWashington County Senior Citizens: $25,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetHOPE CLINIC INC: $22,500 over 3y, 6.4% of budgetGREEN COUNTRY VILLAGE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBARTLESVILLE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOK MOZART INC: $10,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetNEHEMIAH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetProject Tribute Foundation: $4,835 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetGEORGE MIKSCH SUTTON AVIAN RESEARCH CENTER INC: $4,800 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OKLAHOMA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BARTLESVILLE ↗
  • Who funds The Frank Phillips Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE KIDDIE PARK ↗
  • Who funds PRICE TOWER ARTS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds LIGHTHOUSE OUTREACH CENTER OF BARTLESVILLE INC ↗
  • Who funds PATHS TO INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AGAPE MISSION OF BARTLESVILLE INC ↗
  • Who funds BARTLESVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON COUNTY ELDER CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NOWATA ↗
  • Who funds HEARTMATTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds ON THE ROCK MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JOURNEY HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds K-LIFE OF BARTLESVILLE INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER OF SE KANSAS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHEROKEE AREA COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds BARTLESVILLE LIONS CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTSIDE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds DEWEY ATHLETIC BOOSTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPESTONE CANCER SUPPORT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Washington County Senior Citizens ↗
  • Who funds HOPE CLINIC INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lyon FoundationOK64.3× affinity28 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lyon Foundation · Bartlesville Community Foundation · Arvest Foundation · Cresap Family Foundation · McAnaw Family Foundation · The Ae and Juanita Richardson Charitable Foundation · Je and le Mabee Foundation Inc · K S Adams Foundation Co-Trust · Ben F and Karen K Baker Charitable Foundation · Kenneth G and Diana Moon Adams Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · Hicks Geraldine Charitable B Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jeanalee and Charles Parsons Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jeanalee and Charles Parsons Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 190%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 68%
  • George Miksch Sutton Avian Research Center Inc: 68% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
19get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Jeanalee and Charles Parsons Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Jeanalee and Charles Parsons Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jeanalee and Charles Parsons’ filings →

More from the funding graph