Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jdt Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$262k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$364kRecreation & Sports$150kArts & Culture$129kInternational$86kYouth Development$28kCrime & Legal$25kHuman Services$18kHousing & Shelter$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $174k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$661k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HONOR HEALTH FOUNDATION$50,000
HOPE 4 KIDS INTERNATIONAL-ARIZONA$42,883
AFRICAN PARKS FOUNDATION$25,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$25,000
DALLAS MUSEUM OF ART$23,750
PHOENIX ART MUSEUM$17,500
PHOENIX THEATRE COMPANY$15,000
US SKI & SNOWBOARD FOUNDATION$15,000
SOUTHWEST AUTISM RESEARCH$10,000
TRENDS CHARITABLE FUND$7,500
NOT MY KIDS FOUNDATION INC$5,000
BANNER HEALTH FOUNDATION$5,000
TGEN FOUNDATION$5,000
HEARD MUSEUM$5,000
EGYPTIAN THEATRE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%KNOX COUNTY HOMELESS COALITION: $5k → 11%FRESH START WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%MOTHERS GRACE: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NY
UT
MD
AZ
DC
LA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$609k · 10 repeat orgs$222k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
18

Total granted

$609k
$146k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+16%

Still filing today

90%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $77k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HONORHEALTH FOUNDATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $125k · revenue +29%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    5× · 2021–2025 · $115k · revenue +33%
  • BN
    BARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION
    4× · 2019–2023 · $101k · revenue +63%

Funded once

  • AP
    ASU PROJECT HUMANITIES
    one grant, 2019 · $30k
  • MT
    MOUNTAIN TRIALS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • PT
    PC TEEN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
2
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
3
100 Club of Arizona

To provide immediate financial assistance to families of public safety officers and firefighters who are seriously injured or killed in the line of duty, and to provide resources to enhance their safety and welfare.

—
4
Banner Alzheimer's Foundation

Established in 2006, the banner alzheimer's foundation (baf) secures and stewards charitable gifts to advance the mission of banner alzheimer's institute (bai), including groundbreaking research initiatives and pioneering prevention…

Health
5
Greater Phoenix Chamber of Commerce

Greater phoenix chamber of commerce (the chamber) catalyzes regional prosperity with forward-thinking public policy, intentional economic growth, and diverse, prepared talent.

—
6
Lodestar Charitable Foundation

To perform the functions of, or to carry out the purposes of the arizona community foundation, an az nonprofit corporation, so long as the arizona community foundation, inc. remains a qualified organization.

—
7
Philanthropy Southwest

Foster meaningful philanthropy and trusted relationships that impact the southwest region's people, communities, and most pressing issues.philanthropy southwest (psw) membership is about valuable connections and leading-edge learning that…

Philanthropy
8
Loft Cinema Inc Fka Tucson Cinema Foundation Inc

Building community by celebrating the art and diversity of film.

Arts & Culture
9
Santa Fe Community Foundation

The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…

Philanthropy
10
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
11
Colorado Museum of Natural History

Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.

Arts & Culture
12
Arizona Hospital and Healthcare Foundation

Bringing together diverse voices to advance health and healthcare in arizona.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Phoenix Theatre Company and Subsidiary; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
17/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HONORHEALTH FOUNDATION: $125,000 · HealthHONORHEALTH FOUNDATIONAmerican Heart Association Inc: $115,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association IncBARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $101,000 · HealthBARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION+2 more: $15,000 · HealthAFRICAN PARKS FOUNDATION: $35,000 · OtherAFRICAN PARKS FOUNDATIONASU PROJECT HUMANITIES: $30,000 · OtherASU PROJECT HUMANITIESMOUNTAIN TRIALS FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherMOUNTAIN TRIALS FOUNDATIO…PC TEEN FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherPC TEEN FOUNDATIONYOUTH SPORTS ALLIANCE: $15,000 · OtherYOUTH SPORTS ALLIANCEUS SKI SNOWBOARD FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherUS SKI SNOWBOARD FOUNDATI…THE PROMONTORY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherTHE PROMONTORY FOUNDATION+13 more: $35,505 · Other+13 morePHOENIX ART MUSEUM: $27,500 · Arts & CulturePHOENIX ART M…Dallas Museum of Art: $23,750 · Arts & CultureDallas Museum…Park City Performances: $20,000 · Arts & CulturePark City Per…THE PHOENIX THEATRE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY: $15,000 · Arts & CultureTHE PHOENIX T…THE HEARD MUSEUM: $10,000 · Arts & CultureTHE HEARD MUS…+1 more: $1,000 · Arts & CultureUnited States Ski Team Foundation: $65,000 · Recreation & SportsUnited State…USA Nordic Sport: $24,000 · Recreation & SportsUSA Nordic S…HOPE 4 KIDS INTERNATIONAL: $86,203 · InternationalHOPE 4 KIDS…Homeworthy: $5,000 · Human ServicesMOTHER'S GRACE: $2,500 · Human ServicesFRESH START WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Human ServicesTrends Charitable Fund: $7,500 · Philanthropy
Health$356,000Other$185,505Arts & Culture$97,250Recreation & Sports$89,000International$86,203Human Services$9,500Philanthropy$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHONORHEALTH FOUNDATION: $125,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $115,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $101,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE 4 KIDS INTERNATIONAL: $86,203 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetUnited States Ski Team Foundation: $65,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPHOENIX ART MUSEUM: $27,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUSA Nordic Sport: $24,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetDallas Museum of Art: $23,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPark City Performances: $20,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE HEARD MUSEUM: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTrends Charitable Fund: $7,500 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetCHRISTIAN CENTER OF PARK CITY: $5,005 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVALLEY OF THE SUN JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHomeworthy: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - PHOENIX: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPARK CITY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRESH START WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANDRA DAY O'CONNOR INSTITUTE FOR AMERICAN DEMOCRACY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPARK CITY FILM COUNCIL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community FoundationAZ16.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Dorrance Family Foundation · The Bessemer Giving Fund · Lee Family Foundation Inc · William S & Ina Levine Foundation Inc · The Rob Walton Foundation · Park City Community Foundation · Thunderbirds Charities · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · Baird Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Mightycause Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jdt Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jdt Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jdt Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph