· Private foundation
Jdt Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k9 grants · $38k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $174k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HONOR HEALTH FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| HOPE 4 KIDS INTERNATIONAL-ARIZONA | $42,883 |
| AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION | $25,000 |
| AFRICAN PARKS FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| DALLAS MUSEUM OF ART | $23,750 |
| PHOENIX ART MUSEUM | $17,500 |
| PHOENIX THEATRE COMPANY | $15,000 |
| US SKI & SNOWBOARD FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| SOUTHWEST AUTISM RESEARCH | $10,000 |
| TRENDS CHARITABLE FUND | $7,500 |
| EGYPTIAN THEATRE | $5,000 |
| NOT MY KIDS FOUNDATION INC | $5,000 |
| TGEN FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| HEARD MUSEUM | $5,000 |
| BANNER HEALTH FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
10 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $77k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HFHONORHEALTH FOUNDATION3× · 2023–2025 · $125k · revenue +29%
- AHAmerican Heart Association Inc5× · 2021–2025 · $115k · revenue +33%
- BNBARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION4× · 2019–2023 · $101k · revenue +63%
Funded once
- APASU PROJECT HUMANITIESone grant, 2019 · $30k
- MTMOUNTAIN TRIALS FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $25k
- PTPC TEEN FOUNDATIONone grant, 2020 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.
Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.
To provide immediate financial assistance to families of public safety officers and firefighters who are seriously injured or killed in the line of duty, and to provide resources to enhance their safety and welfare.
Established in 2006, the banner alzheimer's foundation (baf) secures and stewards charitable gifts to advance the mission of banner alzheimer's institute (bai), including groundbreaking research initiatives and pioneering prevention…
Greater phoenix chamber of commerce (the chamber) catalyzes regional prosperity with forward-thinking public policy, intentional economic growth, and diverse, prepared talent.
To perform the functions of, or to carry out the purposes of the arizona community foundation, an az nonprofit corporation, so long as the arizona community foundation, inc. remains a qualified organization.
Foster meaningful philanthropy and trusted relationships that impact the southwest region's people, communities, and most pressing issues.philanthropy southwest (psw) membership is about valuable connections and leading-edge learning that…
Building community by celebrating the art and diversity of film.
The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…
The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…
Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.
Bringing together diverse voices to advance health and healthcare in arizona.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Phoenix Theatre Company and Subsidiary and the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 30% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HONORHEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds BARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOPE 4 KIDS INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds United States Ski Team Foundation ↗
- Who funds PHOENIX ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds USA Nordic Sport ↗
- Who funds Dallas Museum of Art ↗
- Who funds Park City Performances ↗
- Who funds THE PHOENIX THEATRE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST AUTISM RESEARCH AND RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE HEARD MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds Trends Charitable Fund ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN CENTER OF PARK CITY ↗
- Who funds Banner Health Foundation ↗
- Who funds Homeworthy ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds VALLEY OF THE SUN JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MOTHER'S GRACE ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - PHOENIX ↗
- Who funds PARK CITY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds FRESH START WOMEN'S FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SANDRA DAY O'CONNOR INSTITUTE FOR AMERICAN DEMOCRACY ↗
- Who funds PARK CITY FILM COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds Hope Ignites Phoenix ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Dorrance Family Foundation · The Bessemer Giving Fund · Lee Family Foundation Inc · William S & Ina Levine Foundation Inc · The Rob Walton Foundation · Park City Community Foundation · Thunderbirds Charities · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · Baird Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Mightycause Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jdt Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.