Skip to content

· Public charity

Jdj Charitable Foundation

Providing financial assistance and support to the sick and underprivileged in the surrounding community.

$353k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$90k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Health$907kRecreation & Sports$186kEducation$168kReligion$54kHuman Services$53kInternational$25kHousing & Shelter$14kPhilanthropy$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $250,096, the rows itemized in this filing. The $353,043 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $102,947 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $130k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $90k
$13,017
Median grant
6
States reached
$15k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE$90,000
NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION$35,000
TOP END SPORTS LLC$22,915
NATIONAL SEATING AND MOBILITY$20,922
SOLO RIDER GOLF CARS$16,550
HOW I ROLL SPORTS$13,017
ST PETERS UNIVERSITY$11,000
NEW YORK ROAD RUNNERS INC$10,830
NY ROLLING FURY CORP$9,325
ADJUVANT BEHAVIORAL HEALTH IN$8,301
CHILDRENS HOSP OF PHILADELPH$6,750
KBGOODZ$5,486
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–22, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 7% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ASPIRING KINDNESS FOUNDATION: $225 → 6%VISIONS: $1k → 17%MAGIC WHEELCHAIR: $500 → 12%PERMOBIL FOUNDATION: $21k → 7%PERMOBIL FOUNDATION: $11k → 7%PERMOBIL FOUNDATION: $5k → 7%JOHANNA'S HOPE: $500 → 7%KIDZ AT PLAY RECREATION COMMUNITY S: $1k → 16%VISIONS: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
MD
TN
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 30 repeat orgs$325k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +70% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 22 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
78

Total granted

$1.1M
$286k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+70%
+29%

Still filing today

40%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationInternationalPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    6× · 2019–2024 · $205k · revenue +97%
  • NY
    NEW YORK ROAD RUNNERS INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $94k · revenue +127%
  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA
    5× · 2018–2022 · $60k · revenue +72%

Funded once

  • MS
    MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING
    one grant, 2023 · $62k
  • TS
    THE SANTUCCI FAMILY
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • SF
    SUMBA FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +161%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
4
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
7
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
8
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
10
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Humc Medical Observation Pa

To serve as the physician services component of a tax-exempt healthcare delivery network and to thereby promote, support & further the charitable purposes, programs & services of hmh hospitals corp.

—
12
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Emerson College; the most unlike its peers is Aspiring Kindness Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 113 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/37
Grantees still filing
27/37
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CEN: $190,100 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENNEW YORK ROAD RUNNERS INC: $94,138 · OtherNEW YORK ROAD RUNNERS INCST PETER'S UNIVERSITY: $81,000 · OtherST PETER'S UNIVERSITYMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING: $62,000 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERINGJESUIT MISSION INC: $53,203 · OtherJESUIT MISSION INCNATIONAL SEATING MOBILITY INC: $50,286 · OtherCHILDREN'S BRAIN TUMOR NETWORK: $50,000 · Other+79 more: $404,121 · Other+79 moreDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $204,695 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institut…THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $60,427 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF …NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $45,000 · HealthNORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATIONMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $35,000 · HealthMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CA…+3 more: $8,652 · HealthPERMOBIL FOUNDATION: $36,494 · Human ServicesBRIDGES OUTREACH INC: $6,000 · Human Services+6 more: $4,725 · Human ServicesSUMBA FOUNDATION: $24,644 · InternationalHEARTS OF JOY INTERNATIONAL CORP: $3,000 · InternationalBRANDEIS UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · EducationPOLY PREP COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $1,500 · EducationEMERSON COLLEGE: $1,000 · EducationFELICIAN UNIVERSITY: $1,000 · EducationMORRIS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · EducationTrustees of Tufts College: $1,000 · Education+2 more: $1,211 · EducationALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC: $5,000 · Public Safety & DisasterCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $1,500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$984,848Health$353,774Human Services$47,219International$27,644Education$26,711Public Safety & Disaster$5,000Food & Nutrition$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $204,695 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK ROAD RUNNERS INC: $94,138 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $60,427 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPERMOBIL FOUNDATION: $36,494 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSUMBA FOUNDATION: $24,644 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetBRANDEIS UNIVERSITY: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMONMOUTH COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF NEW YORK INC: $7,802 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAchilles International Inc: $7,170 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBRIDGES OUTREACH INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHEARTS OF JOY INTERNATIONAL CORP: $3,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetPOLY PREP COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BIRTHDAY PARTY PROJECT: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVISIONSSERVICES FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKIDZ AT PLAY RECREATION COMMUNITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEMERSON COLLEGE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFELICIAN UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMORRIS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LOUKOUMI MAKE A DIFFERENCE FOUNDATION INC: $850 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetBELOVED COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOL: $711 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMDRC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF HUDSON COUNTY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHANNA'S HOPE INC: $500 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetFordham University: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMagic Wheelchair: $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMUSICIANS ON CALL INC: $410 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetITALIAN EDUCATIONAL & CULTURAL CTR: $150 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK ROAD RUNNERS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PERMOBIL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SUMBA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MONMOUTH COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds Achilles International Inc ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGES OUTREACH INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift FundNY15.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Community Foundation of New Jersey · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Investors Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Jewish Communal Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jdj Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jdj Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Bridges Outreach Inc: 25% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
  • Brandeis University: 9% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Emerson College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Jdj Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Jdj Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 113 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jdj’s filings →

More from the funding graph