Skip to content
Jd Sheth Foundation Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Jd Sheth Foundation Inc

The jd sheth foundation is a project to project based organization focusing on the education, health, and well being of others, specifically children and the elderly, here in the united states and across the globe.

$24k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

International$63kReligion$27kEducation$20kHuman Services$16kArts & Culture$13kCivil Rights$11kHousing & Shelter$10kHealth$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $19,929, the rows itemized in this filing. The $24,068 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $4,139 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $10k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$541k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EASTERSEALS REHABILITION CENTER$10,000
IMMIGRANT WELCOME & RESOURCE CENTER$9,929
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%IMMIGRANT WELCOME & RESOURCE CENTER: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

55%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$98k · 3 repeat orgs$79k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +11% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
6

Total granted

$98k
$59k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
0%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
InternationalCivil RightsReligionPhilanthropyEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IM
    Imani Milele Children Inc
    2× · 2022–2023 · $50k · revenue +54%
  • HI
    HAND IN HAND MINISTRIES INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $27k · revenue +11%
  • EF
    EVSC FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $20k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • AP
    AMANI PARTNERS KENYA
    one grant, 2023 · $13k · revenue +3%
  • CM
    CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF EVANSVILLE
    one grant, 2023 · $13k
  • AP
    AFRICAN PEOPLES EDUCATION AND DEFEN
    one grant, 2022 · $11k · revenue -70%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Imani Stepps

Helping impovershed individuals

Youth Development
2
Partnership for Indigenous Peoples -Pipes - International

We are a global Christian organization committed to partnering with indigenous peoples, local churches, and community-based organizations to make disciples of Jesus Christ and help end extreme poverty. We serve indigenous pygmies,…

International
3
Amani Global Works

Amani Global Works ("Amani") was formed to develop and implement a comprehensive, inclusive and sustainable model for the provision of healthcare and related services to underserved rural communities in Africa. Amanis mission is to save…

Health
4
VILLAGE2VILLAGE Project Inc

To provide comprehensive, empowering, respectful and compassionate care for Uganda's vulnerable children and their families, one life at a time. Our vision is to transform children with stolen futures into tomorrow's leaders. We believe…

Human Services
5
Heart Bridge International

Heart Bridge International exists to equip and empower Christians around the world to fulfill the Great Commission. The organization provides free ministry training, discipleship resources, and practical coaching to under-resourced…

Religion
6
Emmanne Ministries

We point people to jesus through loving action and the life-giving word.

International
7
Assist International Inc

Assist international partners with changemakers around the world to provide solutions that save lives and build resilient communities. we accomplish our mission with actionable projects that make a lasting and sustainable impact on the…

International
8
Immigrant & Refugee Law Center

The Immigrant and Refugee Law Center provides accessible legal services to immigrant and refugee families in the Greater Cincinnati community.

Crime & Legal
9
Embrace It Africa

To improve the quality of education and life for children/orphans in Uganda.

International
10
East African Healing Services
—
11
Us Africa Institute

U.S. Africa Institute?s primary exempt purpose is to support immigrant students and communities by offering a wide range of academic and community services at no cost. These services aim to enhance educational opportunities, promote social…

Community Improvement
12
Imani Bridges

The purpose of Imani Bridges is to build collaborative church partnerships to do collective impact to improve communities in need. We accomplish this through leadership development, community development, economic development and forming…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Evsc Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Immigrant Welcome and Resource Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Imani Milele Children Inc: $50,339 · InternationalImani Milele Children IncCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF EVANSVILLE: $12,500 · OtherCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF EVANSVI…ECHO HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $10,000 · OtherECHO HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEV…ARK CRISIS CHILDRENS CENTER: $5,783 · OtherARK CRISIS CHILDRENS CENTERIMMIGRANT WELCOME AND RESOURCE CENTER: $9,929 · OtherIMMIGRANT WELCOME AND RESOUR…Henderson Leadership Initiative Inc: $7,000 · OtherHenderson Leadership Initiat…HAND IN HAND MINISTRIES INC: $27,200 · ReligionHAND IN HAND MINI…EVSC FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyEVSC FOUNDAT…AMANI PARTNERS KENYA: $12,855 · EducationAFRICAN PEOPLES EDUCATION AND DEFEN: $11,342 · Civil RightsEASTER SEALS REHABILITATION CENTER INC: $10,000 · Health
International$50,339Other$45,212Religion$27,200Philanthropy$20,000Education$12,855Civil Rights$11,342Health$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetImani Milele Children Inc: $50,339 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetHAND IN HAND MINISTRIES INC: $27,200 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetEVSC FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAMANI PARTNERS KENYA: $12,855 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetAFRICAN PEOPLES EDUCATION AND DEFEN: $11,342 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHenderson Leadership Initiative Inc: $7,000 over 1y, 13% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Baird Foundation IncNetwork for GoodThe Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Community Foundation Alliance IncIN13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation Alliance Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jd Sheth Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jd Sheth Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 66%
  • African Peoples Education and Defen: 66% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jd Sheth’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home