Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Jansen Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$233k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$120k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Philanthropy$1.0MReligion$738kHealth$52kInternational$23kHuman Services$20kScience & Tech$14kEducation$6kYouth Development$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $100k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $120k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$6.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$120,000
Individual grant recipient$42,713
ABBA'S HOUSE$23,000
Samaritan's Purse International Rel$14,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
McIntosh Ministries$10,000
Harvest Christian Fellowship$5,000
Behold Israel$5,000
JOSHUA FUND$2,500
CALVARY CHAPEL$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 77% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Jews for Jesus: $5k → 10%Rock Church Global Outreach: $5k → 11%Harvest Christian Fellowship: $11k → 11%Antioch Missions International: $5k → 14%INSTITUTE FOR CREATION RESEARCH: $8k → 14%McIntosh Ministries: $10k → 14%Calvary Chapel Greer SC: $40k → 10%Crown Financial Ministry: $4k → 12%Calvary Chapel Chatanooga: $120k → 12%Moriel Ministries: $5k → 13%Love Worth Finding Ministries: $5k → 17%Samaritan's Purse Internaltional Re: $20k → 21%JOSHUA FUND: $14k → 9%CALVARY CHAPEL SPRING VALLEY: $75k → 13%THE GATHERING SD: $203k → 11%Harvest Christian Fellowship: $5k → 11%Joni and Friends: $5k → 14%INSTITUTE FOR CREATION RESEARCH: $4k → 14%Crown Financial Ministry: $3k → 12%Samaritan's Purse International Rel: $14k → 21%JOSHUA FUND: $8k → 9%Las Vegas Reach - Awaken: $71k → 13%The Gathering SD: $100k → 11%Harvest Christian Fellowship: $3k → 11%INSTITUTE FOR CREATION RESEARCH: $3k → 14%Samaritan's Purse International Rel: $7k → 21%JOSHUA FUND: $3k → 9%CALVARY CHAPEL: $55k → 13%THE GATHERING SD: $57k → 11%JOSHUA FUND: $3k → 9%CALVARY CHAPEL: $31k → 13%THE GATHERING SD: $8k → 11%Miscellaneous Organized Charities: $18k → 13%THE GATHERING SD: $5k → 11%Miscellaneous Organized Charities: $12k → 13%Las Vegas Reach - Awaken: $10k → 13%Park Hill Church: $5k → 11%CALVARY CHAPEL SPRING VALLEY: $10k → 13%Miscellaneous Organized Charities: $7k → 13%ABBA'S HOUSE: $248k → 13%ABBA'S HOUSE: $235k → 13%ABBA'S HOUSE: $181k → 13%ABBA'S HOUSE: $100k → 13%ABBA'S HOUSE: $100k → 13%ABBA'S HOUSE: $51k → 13%ABBA'S HOUSE: $30k → 13%ABBA'S HOUSE: $23k → 13%NV Childhool Cancer Foundation: $7k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ID
NV
OH
CA
CO
TN
NC
SC
OK
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.8M · 14 repeat orgs$319k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +93% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
15

Total granted

$1.8M
$141k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+93%
0%

Still filing today

29%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 24% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $178k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHealthPhilanthropyScience & TechOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    Abbas House
    8× · 2017–2025 · $967k · revenue +93% · 67% of their budget
  • TJ
    THE JOSHUA FUND
    4× · 2022–2025 · $28k · revenue +102%
  • AM
    ARIEL MINISTRIES
    2× · 2023–2024 · $6k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • CC
    Calvary Chapel Greer SC
    one grant, 2024 · $40k
  • SP
    Samaritan's Purse Internaltional Re
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • HC
    HORIZON CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP
    one grant, 2024 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Joshua Nations International

Spreading christianity worldwide.

Religion
2
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

3
Israel Restoration Ministries
Religion
4
Ambassadors for Christ International - Usa Inc

Ambassadors for Christ International - USA is a fellowship of gospel preachers and teachers whose mission is to preach Christ, edify the Church, and to glorify God and serve as a catalyst for revival, evangelism, and training of Christians…

Religion
5
Messiah for Israel Ministries Inc

The ministry is organized for the following purposes: (1)to minister to the Jewish people and educate them as to the Christian faith and their place in it according to the Bible; (2) to minister to other non-Christians and educate them as…

Religion
6
Hal Lindsey Website Ministries

Teaching and Spreading the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

Religion
7
Manny Arango Ministries Inc

Promote Gods word through understanding the Bible

Religion
8
Jim King Ministries Inc

Proclaim the gospel of jesus christ

Religion
9
King Ministries International

To spread the Gospel of Jesus the Christ

Religion
10
Jesus Ministries International

Promote christian religion through conferences and group meetings.

Religion
11
Elijah List Ministries Inc

A religous organization performing charitable acts and teachings related to the bible.

Religion
12
C4I Christians for Israel

To present a biblical perspective of god's plans and purpose for israel and the church

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ariel Ministries and the most unlike its peers is Abbas House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GATHERING SD — $373,886 · OtherGATHERING SDIndividual grant recipient — $120,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCALVARY CHAPEL — $86,000 · OtherCALVARY CHAPELAWAKEN CHURCH LAS VEGAS — $85,000 · OtherAWAKEN CHURCH LAS VEGASIndividual grant recipient — $81,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHealing Center of San Diego — $45,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $42,713 · OtherCalvary Chapel Greer SC — $40,000 · OtherMiscellaneous Organized Charities — $36,500 · Other+14 more — $143,500 · Other+14 moreAbbas House — $967,351 · PhilanthropyAbbas HouseTHE JOSHUA FUND — $27,500 · ReligionKOINONIA HOUSE INC — $10,000 · ReligionARIEL MINISTRIES — $6,000 · ReligionLOVE WORTH FINDING MINISTRIES INC — $5,000 · ReligionMORIEL MINISTRIES — $5,000 · ReligionBEHOLD ISRAEL — $5,000 · ReligionINSTITUTE FOR CREATION RESEARCH — $14,000 · Science & TechNEVADA CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION — $7,000 · HealthTURNING POINT — $3,000 · Health
Other$1,053,599Philanthropy$967,351Religion$58,500Science & Tech$14,000Health$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAbbas House — $967,351 over 8y, 67% of budgetTHE JOSHUA FUND — $27,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR CREATION RESEARCH — $14,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKOINONIA HOUSE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNEVADA CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION — $7,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetARIEL MINISTRIES — $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJONI AND FRIENDS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOVE WORTH FINDING MINISTRIES INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMORIEL MINISTRIES — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Abbas House
  • Who funds THE JOSHUA FUND
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR CREATION RESEARCH
  • Who funds KOINONIA HOUSE INC
  • Who funds NEVADA CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ARIEL MINISTRIES
  • Who funds JONI AND FRIENDS
  • Who funds LOVE WORTH FINDING MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds MORIEL MINISTRIES
  • Who funds BEHOLD ISRAEL

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Christian Community Foundation IncCO12.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jansen Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Jansen Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Jansen Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph