Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Janet & Seth Rosenberg Foundation I

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$21k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0180% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Health$50kFood & Nutrition$7kEducation$7kArts & Culture$6kPhilanthropy$4kReligion$1kInternational$1kAnimals$750Other$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,250
Median grant
6
States reached
$452k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ASPERGER'S ASSOC OF NEW ENGLAND$10,000
ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE$2,000
FRIENDS OF KAREN$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,600
ORANGE CO JEWISH COMMUNITY SCHOLAR$1,250
WASHINGTON JEFFERSON COLLEGE$1,000
QUINCEA$1,000
ST LUKE FUND FOR HATI$1,000
FAME$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$78k · 9 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
12

Total granted

$78k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+91%

Still filing today

56%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationAnimalsFood & NutritionArts & CultureInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    ASSOCIATION FOR AUTISM AND NEURODIVERSITY INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $35k · revenue +157%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF KAREN INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $8k · revenue +23%
  • SM
    ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE
    6× · 2019–2024 · $7k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • BA
    BALLET ARIZONAgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue +91%
  • AR
    ARTISTS RELIEF FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • AR
    ARTIST RELIEF FUND INC
    one grant, 2020 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

2
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
5
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
6
National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors

Empowering financial professionals and consumers through world-class advocacy and education.

7
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

8
Friends for Animals of Metro Detroit

The friends are dedicated to the rescue, protection, and adoption of companion animals in need while inspiring the human-animal bond. we meet our mission by:-saving 100% of healthy and treatable animals.-providing high-quality animal care…

Animals
9
Saint Anselm College

Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…

Education
10
American Foreign Service Association

American foreign service association (afsa) is both the principal advocate for the long-term institutional wellbeing of the professional career foreign service and responsible for safeguarding the interest of afsa members. (continued on…

11
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
12
University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Quincea Inc and the most unlike its peers is Friends for Life Animal Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
11/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ASSOCIATION FOR AUTISM AND NEURODIVERSITY INC — $35,000 · HealthASSOCIATION FOR AUTISM AND NEURODIVERSITY INCFRIENDS OF KAREN INC — $8,000 · HealthFRIENDS OF KAREN INCIndividual grant recipient — $8,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFAME — $6,000 · OtherFAMEST LUKE FUND FOR HATI — $4,000 · OtherST LUKE FUND FOR HATIARTISTS RELIEF FUND — $2,250 · OtherARTISTS RELIEF FUNDIndividual grant recipient — $1,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDUET PARTNERS IN HEALTH — $1,500 · OtherORANGE CO JEWISH COMMUNITY SCHOLAR — $1,250 · OtherARTIST RELIEF FUND INC — $1,100 · OtherCONGREGATION EMANU-EL OF WESTCHESTER — $1,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $1,000 · Other+5 more — $2,250 · Other+5 moreST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE — $7,000 · Food & NutritionWASHINGTON & JEFFERSON COLLEGE — $4,250 · EducationPRESIDENT AND TRUSTEES OF BATES COLLEGE — $1,000 · EducationQUINCEA INC — $4,000 · EmploymentBALLET ARIZONA — $2,500 · Arts & CultureMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC — $1,000 · Human Services
Health$43,000Other$29,950Food & Nutrition$7,000Education$5,250Employment$4,000Arts & Culture$2,500Human Services$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetASSOCIATION FOR AUTISM AND NEURODIVERSITY INC — $35,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF KAREN INC — $8,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE — $7,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON & JEFFERSON COLLEGE — $4,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetQUINCEA INC — $4,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBALLET ARIZONA — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRESIDENT AND TRUSTEES OF BATES COLLEGE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Forgotten International — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS FOR LIFE ANIMAL RESCUE — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOREVER LOVED PET SANCTUARY — $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ASSOCIATION FOR AUTISM AND NEURODIVERSITY INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF KAREN INC
  • Who funds ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE
  • Who funds WASHINGTON & JEFFERSON COLLEGE
  • Who funds QUINCEA INC
  • Who funds BALLET ARIZONA
  • Who funds MEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC
  • Who funds PRESIDENT AND TRUSTEES OF BATES COLLEGE
  • Who funds The Forgotten International
  • Who funds FRIENDS FOR LIFE ANIMAL RESCUE
  • Who funds FOREVER LOVED PET SANCTUARY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodDC11× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Janet & Seth Rosenberg Foundation I funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 24%
  • Association for Autism and Neurodiversity Inc24% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Janet & Seth Rosenberg Foundation I?

Find your warmest path to Janet & Seth Rosenberg Foundation I through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph