Skip to content
Jane W Nuhn Charitable Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

Jane W Nuhn Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$663k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$3.1MEducation$576kEnvironment$377kHealth$152kHuman Services$103kRecreation & Sports$60kFood & Nutrition$45kHousing & Shelter$35kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $63k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $585k
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE ART EFFECT$150,000
BARDAVON 1869 OPERA HOUSE$100,000
Individual grant recipient$100,000
THE ART EFFECT$100,000
Individual grant recipient$85,000
MARIST COLLEGE$50,000
SCENIC HUDSON$20,000
POUGHKEEPSIE ALLIANCE$18,000
MANCHESTER FIREMEN'S RELIEF ASSOC$15,000
DAY ONE EARLY LEARNING COMMUNITY$10,000
TRANSART & CULTURAL SERVICES INC$7,500
ST CHRISTOPHER'S INN INC$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–22, $73k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%GREYSTONE PROGRAMS INC: $30k → 9%NUBIAN DIRECTIONS II: $31k → 9%NUBIAN DIRECTIONS II: $11k → 9%NUBIAN DIRECTIONS II: $2k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.3M · 26 repeat orgs$288k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
17

Total granted

$4.3M
$278k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+24%

Still filing today

85%
82%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationEnvironmentHealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BARD COLLEGE
    7× · 2017–2023 · $350k · revenue +256%
  • MU
    MARIST UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2017–2024 · $181k · revenue +52%
  • SH
    Scenic Hudson Inc
    7× · 2017–2024 · $150k · revenue +86%

Funded once

  • TP
    THE POUGHKEEPSIE-HIGHLAND RAILROAD
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue -28%
  • PB
    PHILIPSTOWN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH HUB INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $36k · revenue +201%
  • TA
    THE ART EFFECT OF THE HUDSON VALLEY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $35k · revenue +103%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hudson Yards Development Corporation

See schedule oto coordinate and facilitate the economic development of the hudson yards area of manhattan. this includes construction of an extension to the no. subway line, the coordination of the design and construction of certain public…

Community Improvement
2
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
3
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
4
Historic Hudson Valley

The organization's mission is to celebrate the history, architecture, landscape and material culture of the hudson valley, advancing its importance and thereby assuring its preservation.

Arts & Culture
5
The Landmark Society of Western New York Inc

To educate the community as to the significance of their architectural and historic heritage through the preservation, protection, improvement, and restoration of sites and buildings in western new york that are of historic or civic…

Arts & Culture
6
Susquehanna Heritage Corporation

As a designated national and state heritage area, susquehanna heritage corporation works to raise awareness and appreciation of the cultural and economic value of the susquehanna riverlands, and preserve, enhance and celebrate the area's…

Community Improvement
7
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Hudson Highlands Fjord Trail Inc

To create and steward a 7.5-mile linear park along the Hudson River that solves existing safety concerns around visitation, provides welcoming access to people of all abilities, restores and protects natural resources, and enhances quality…

Environment
11
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
12
The Adirondack Council Inc

The adirondack council ensures the ecological integrity (clean water and air, wildlife habitat, etc.), wild character (solitude, scenic beauty, etc.), and vibrant communities of new york's six-million-acre adirondack park. the adirondack…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Mid-Hudson Heritage Center Inc Dba Fall Kill Creative Works. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/38
Grantees still filing
28/38
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE ART EFFECT: $1,013,000 · OtherTHE ART EFFECTIndividual grant recipient: $780,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+14 more: $320,376 · Other+14 moreBARDAVON 1869 OPERA HOUSE: $1,050,000 · Arts & CultureBARDAVON 1869 OPERA HOUSETHOMAS COLE HISTORIC HOUSE: $75,000 · Arts & CultureThe Bannermans Castle Trust Inc: $60,000 · Arts & CultureNEW YORK STAGE AND FILM INC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureTHE POUGHKEEPSIE-HIGHLAND RAILROAD: $50,000 · Arts & Culture+8 more: $155,737 · Arts & Culture+8 moreBARD COLLEGE: $350,000 · EducationBARD COLLEGEMARIST UNIVERSITY: $181,000 · EducationMARIST UNIVERS…ANDERSON CENTER FOR AUTISM: $22,254 · Education+3 more: $25,000 · EducationScenic Hudson Inc: $150,000 · EnvironmentOPEN SPACE INSTITUTE INC: $100,000 · EnvironmentCIDER MILL FRIENDS OF OPEN SPACE & HISTORIC PRESERVATION INC: $40,000 · EnvironmentNUBIAN DIRECTIONS II INC: $43,439 · Human ServicesGREYSTONE PROGRAMS INC: $29,500 · Human ServicesPHILIPSTOWN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH HUB INC: $36,000 · HealthMILES OF HOPE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $14,038 · HealthDartmouth-Hitchcock Health: $11,375 · HealthPOUGHKEEPSIE ALLIANCE INC: $33,000 · Community Improvement
Other$2,113,376Arts & Culture$1,440,737Education$578,254Environment$290,000Human Services$72,939Health$61,413Community Improvement$33,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBARDAVON 1869 OPERA HOUSE: $1,050,000 over 8y, 8.4% of budgetBARD COLLEGE: $350,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMARIST UNIVERSITY: $181,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetScenic Hudson Inc: $150,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetOPEN SPACE INSTITUTE INC: $100,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetTHOMAS COLE HISTORIC HOUSE: $75,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetFAMILY SERVICES INC: $60,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetThe Bannermans Castle Trust Inc: $60,000 over 3y, 6.4% of budgetNEW YORK STAGE AND FILM INC: $50,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetTHE POUGHKEEPSIE-HIGHLAND RAILROAD: $50,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetNUBIAN DIRECTIONS II INC: $43,439 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetPOUGHKEEPSIE FARM PROJECT: $40,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetCIDER MILL FRIENDS OF OPEN SPACE & HISTORIC PRESERVATION INC: $40,000 over 2y, 59% of budgetNEW HORIZONS FOUNDATION: $37,200 over 3y, 14% of budgetCOUNTY PLAYERS INC: $36,310 over 2y, 74% of budgetPHILIPSTOWN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH HUB INC: $36,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetThe Mid-Hudson Heritage Center Inc DBA Fall Kill Creative Works: $35,917 over 3y, 12% of budgetTHE ART EFFECT OF THE HUDSON VALLEY INC: $35,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetPOUGHKEEPSIE ALLIANCE INC: $33,000 over 2y, 24% of budgetManchester Firemens Relief Association: $30,000 over 2y, 31% of budgetGREYSTONE PROGRAMS INC: $29,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHUGUENOT HISTORICAL SOCIETY NEW PALTZ NY: $24,010 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetANDERSON CENTER FOR AUTISM: $22,254 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMID-HUDSON PATTERN FOR PROGRESSINC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetHUDSON RIVER HOUSING INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST CHRISTOPHER'S INN INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMILES OF HOPE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $14,038 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetTRANSART AND CULTURAL SERVICES INC: $12,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetDartmouth-Hitchcock Health: $11,375 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDAY ONE EARLY LEARNING COMMUNITY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFRESH AIR FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDUTCHESS COUNTY SPCA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMount Saint Mary College: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAND TO LEARN: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF MILLS MANSION: $2,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetO POSITIVE FESTIVAL INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundations…The Dyson FoundationUlster Savings Charit…Arts Mid-Hudson IncIbm International Fou…JM McDonald Foundatio…Price Chopper's Golub…Henry L Kimelman Fami…Evelyn M Davies Chari…Bank of Greene County…Vassar CollegeNuvance Health
Community Foundations of the Hudson Valley IncNY42.1× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundations of the Hudson Valley Inc · The Dyson Foundation · Ulster Savings Charitable Foundation · Arts Mid-Hudson Inc · Ibm International Foundation · JM McDonald Foundation Inc · Price Chopper's Golub Foundation · Henry L Kimelman Family Foundation · Evelyn M Davies Charitable Trust Mark V Dennis Trustee · Bank of Greene County Charitable Foundation · Vassar College · Nuvance Health

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jane W Nuhn Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jane W Nuhn Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jane W Nuhn’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home