Skip to content
Jane N Mooty Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Jane N Mooty Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$625k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$1.4MPhilanthropy$942kArts & Culture$805kFood & Nutrition$765kScience & Tech$690kEnvironment$246kHuman Services$135kHealth$85kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k4 grants · $270k
  • $250k+5 grants · $2.3M
$250,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAGAMORE INSTITUTE$625,000
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION$625,000
PITNEY MEADOWS COMMUNITY FARM$525,000
SARATOGA INSTITUE$300,000
AMERICAN SWEDISH INSTITUTION$250,000
THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$100,000
GLASER FAMILY FOUNDATION$62,415
NORDLY'S FOUNDATION$57,407
YMCA OF THE GREATER TWIN CITIES$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $125k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%YMCA OF THE GREATER TWIN CITIES: $50k → 11%YMCA OF THE GREATER TWIN CITIES: $25k → 11%YMCA OF THE GREATER TWIN CITIES: $25k → 11%YMCA OF THE GREATER TWIN CITIES: $25k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.8M · 18 repeat orgs$152k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
14

Total granted

$4.8M
$152k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+16%

Still filing today

67%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentEducationPhilanthropyFood & NutritionArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +137%
  • PM
    PITNEY MEADOWS COMMUNITY FARM INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $755k · revenue +43% · 35% of their budget
  • GF
    GLASER FAMILY FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $755k · revenue ×11 · 100% of their budget

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $62k
  • SI
    SAGAMORE INSTITUTE GREAT CAMP SAGAMORE
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • TW
    THE WESLEY FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
2
Adirondack Land Trust Inc

To forever conserve the forests, farmlands, waters and wild places that advance the quality of life of our communities and the ecological integrity of the adirondacks.

Environment
3
Earth & Space Research

Increase societal understanding of the earth system through scientific research and education.

Science & Tech
4
New Jersey Conservation Foundation

Recognizing that a healthy environment is critical to the well-being and survival of all living things, new jersey conservation foundation is devoted to preserving land and protecting natural resources throughout new jersey's (continued on…

Environment
5
Hudson River Foundation for Science and Environmental Research Inc

The mission of the hudson river foundation is to inspire and inform action through science and engaging people to enhance the hudson river, estuary, and watershed (see schedule o).

Environment
6
Riverkeeper Inc

Protects and restores the hudson river from source to sea and safeguards drinking water supplies.

Environment
7
West Creek Conservancy

Our mission is to enrich the lives of all people in northeast ohio by conserving natural habitats, restoring the ecological value of our region's lands and waters, and expanding opportunities to connect people from all cultures to…

Environment
8
The Quebec-Labrador Foundation Inc

The program mission of the quebec-labrador foundation u.s. is defined by a regional component (new england and eastern canada), and an international component, which ties our regional model to a global conservation network. qlf's program…

Philanthropy
9
Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc

To protect the nature of massachusetts for people and for wildlife through education, land conservation, advocacy, scientific research, and habitat stewardship/restoration.

Environment
10
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
11
Huron Pines Resource Conservation & Development Council Inc

It is our mission at huron pines to conserve and enhance northern michigan's natural resources to ensure healthy water, protected places and vibrant communities. for alomst 50 years, our work across the forests, lakes and streams of…

Environment
12
Nia Tero Foundation

Nia tero works alongside indigenous peoples to secure their guardianship of vital ecosystems. indigenous peoples are guardians of earth.(see schedule o)

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Adirondack Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Nordlys Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
16/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $1,248,300 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATIONGLASER FAMILY FOUNDATION: $754,975 · EducationGLASER FAMILY FOUNDATIONNORTH HOUSE FOLK SCHOOL: $75,000 · Education+1 more: $250 · EducationSAGAMORE INSTITUTE: $690,000 · OtherSAGAMORE INSTITUTETGEN: $64,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $62,000 · OtherCHICAS RESCUE INC: $60,000 · OtherYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTH: $125,000 · OtherYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC…+14 more: $209,300 · Other+14 morePITNEY MEADOWS COMMUNITY FARM INC: $755,000 · Food & NutritionPITNEY MEADOWS C…THE AMERICAN SWEDISH INSTITUTE: $430,000 · Arts & CultureTHE AMERI…SARATOGA INSTITUTE INC: $320,000 · Community ImprovementTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE GREATER CAPITAL REGION INC: $100,000 · PhilanthropyNORDLYS FOUNDATION: $77,407 · PhilanthropyTHE WESLEY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyADIRONDACK FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyTHE ADIRONDACK COUNCIL INC: $80,000 · EnvironmentSARATOGA PLAN INC: $40,000 · EnvironmentHUDSON SLOOP CLUB INC: $30,000 · EnvironmentAGRICULTURAL STEWARDSHIP ASSN INC: $10,000 · Environment+2 more: $6,000 · Environment
Education$2,078,525Other$1,210,300Food & Nutrition$755,000Arts & Culture$430,000Community Improvement$320,000Philanthropy$197,407Environment$166,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $1,248,300 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPITNEY MEADOWS COMMUNITY FARM INC: $755,000 over 5y, 35% of budgetGLASER FAMILY FOUNDATION: $754,975 over 5y, 100% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SWEDISH INSTITUTE: $430,000 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetSARATOGA INSTITUTE INC: $320,000 over 3y, 75% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTH: $125,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE GREATER CAPITAL REGION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE ADIRONDACK COUNCIL INC: $80,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetNORDLYS FOUNDATION: $77,407 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetNORTH HOUSE FOLK SCHOOL: $75,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetSARATOGA SPRINGS PRESERVATION FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSARATOGA PLAN INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetHUDSON SLOOP CLUB INC: $30,000 over 3y, 7.7% of budgetTHE WESLEY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetADIRONDACK FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSaratoga Regional YMCA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAGRICULTURAL STEWARDSHIP ASSN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSOBRO CONSERVANCY OF SARATOGA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOUTWARD BOUND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDESERT WILLOW PTO: $250 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundat…Nordlys FoundationThe Adirondack Trust …Ge Aerospace Foundati…Wsb Family FoundationAlfred Z Solomon Test…Verizon FoundationVanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …American Online Givin…Amazonsmile Foundation
The Community Foundation for the Greater Capital Region IncNY23.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for the Greater Capital Region Inc · Nordlys Foundation · The Adirondack Trust Company Community Fund · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Wsb Family Foundation · Alfred Z Solomon Testamentary Trust · Verizon Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jane N Mooty Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jane N Mooty Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Jane N Mooty Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Jane N Mooty Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jane N Mooty’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home