Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jane and Sykes Wilford Foundation

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$29k
Granted FY2020
27
Grants FY2020
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2020 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k26 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$350
Median grant
3
States reached
$258k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
St Michael's Church$10,000
Cathedral of St Luke St Paul$3,000
University of New Orleans$2,500
Charleston Symphony Orchestra$2,000
Spoleto$2,000
St Johns Cathedral$1,500
Institute for Justice$1,250
Friends of Library CofC$1,000
IHS$700
Individual grant recipient$500
Mercatus$500
CATO$500
FIRE$500
Catholic Charities$350
Individual grant recipient$250
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FIRE: $500 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The South Carolina Historical Society

The schs mission is to expand, preserve, and make accessible our invaluable collection, and to encourage interest and pride in the rich history of our state.

Arts & Culture
2
American College of the Building Arts

The American College of the Building Arts educates and trains artisans in the traditional building arts to foster exceptional craftsmanship and encourage the preservation, enrichment, and understanding of the world's architectural heritage…

Education
3
Charlotte Mecklenburg Afro-American Cultural and Service Center Inc

The harvey b. gantt center for african-american arts and culture (formerly the charlotte-mecklenburg afro-american cultural and service center) exists to present, preserve and promote african american art, culture and history for the…

Arts & Culture
4
Charleston Hispanic Association
Community Improvement
5
The Char and Chuck Fowler Family Foundation
Philanthropy
6
South Carolina Public Interest Foundation
Crime & Legal
7
Caroline Mark Home
—
8
The Charles Foundation
Philanthropy
9
The Charles Foundation
Philanthropy
10
The Daniel O Morris South Carolina Low Country Heritage Trust
Philanthropy
11
Lyrica Baroque

The mission of lyrica baroque is to support a diverse community of students, teachers, artists, institutions and audiences of all ages through education, collaboration and performance. lyrica baroque seeks to promote the extraordinary…

Arts & Culture
12
South Carolina Urban Entomology Charitable Alliance
Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities of South Carolina; the most unlike its peers is Fire. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

St Michael's Church: $10,000 · OtherSt Michael's ChurchCathedral of St Luke St Paul: $3,000 · OtherCathedral of St Luke St PaulUniversity of New Orleans: $2,500 · OtherUniversity of New OrleansSpoleto: $2,000 · OtherSpoletoSt Johns Cathedral: $1,500 · OtherSt Johns CathedralInstitute for Justice: $1,250 · OtherFriends of Library CofC: $1,000 · Other+16 more: $4,625 · Other+16 moreCHARLESTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $2,000 · Arts & CultureColour of Music: $200 · Arts & CultureFIRE: $500 · Human ServicesFULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING OF MCCORMICK SC INC: $150 · Housing & Shelter
Other$25,875Arts & Culture$2,200Human Services$500Housing & Shelter$150

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHARLESTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCatholic Charities of South Carolina: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetColour of Music: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPALMETTO PROJECT INC: $165 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCharleston Library Society: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING OF MCCORMICK SC INC: $150 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHISTORIC CHARLESTON FOUNDATION: $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHARLESTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
  • Who funds FIRE ↗
  • Who funds Catholic Charities of South Carolina ↗
  • Who funds Colour of Music ↗
  • Who funds PALMETTO PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Charleston Library Society ↗
  • Who funds FULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING OF MCCORMICK SC INC ↗
  • Who funds HISTORIC CHARLESTON FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Coastal Community Foundation of South Carolina IncSC17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Coastal Community Foundation of South Carolina Inc · John M Rivers Jr Foundation · Post and Courier Foundation · Central Carolina Community Foundation · The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jane and Sykes Wilford Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jane and Sykes Wilford Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jane and Sykes Wilford’s filings →

    More from the funding graph