Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Jane and Sykes Wilford Foundation

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$29k
Granted FY2020
27
Grants FY2020
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2020 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k26 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$350
Median grant
3
States reached
$258k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
St Michael's Church$10,000
Cathedral of St Luke St Paul$3,000
University of New Orleans$2,500
Charleston Symphony Orchestra$2,000
Spoleto$2,000
St Johns Cathedral$1,500
Institute for Justice$1,250
Friends of Library CofC$1,000
IHS$700
CATO$500
FIRE$500
Individual grant recipient$500
Mercatus$500
Catholic Charities$350
The Citadel$250
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FIRE: $500 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The South Carolina Historical Society

The schs mission is to expand, preserve, and make accessible our invaluable collection, and to encourage interest and pride in the rich history of our state.

Arts & Culture
2
American College of the Building Arts

The American College of the Building Arts educates and trains artisans in the traditional building arts to foster exceptional craftsmanship and encourage the preservation, enrichment, and understanding of the world's architectural heritage…

Education
3
Charlotte Mecklenburg Afro-American Cultural and Service Center Inc

The harvey b. gantt center for african-american arts and culture (formerly the charlotte-mecklenburg afro-american cultural and service center) exists to present, preserve and promote african american art, culture and history for the…

Arts & Culture
4
Charleston Hispanic Association
Community Improvement
5
The Char and Chuck Fowler Family Foundation
Philanthropy
6
South Carolina Public Interest Foundation
Crime & Legal
7
Caroline Mark Home
8
The Charles Foundation
Philanthropy
9
The Charles Foundation
Philanthropy
10
The Daniel O Morris South Carolina Low Country Heritage Trust
Philanthropy
11
Lyrica Baroque

The mission of lyrica baroque is to support a diverse community of students, teachers, artists, institutions and audiences of all ages through education, collaboration and performance. lyrica baroque seeks to promote the extraordinary…

Arts & Culture
12
South Carolina Urban Entomology Charitable Alliance
Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities of South Carolina and the most unlike its peers is Fire. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

St Michael's Church — $10,000 · OtherSt Michael's ChurchCathedral of St Luke St Paul — $3,000 · OtherCathedral of St Luke St PaulUniversity of New Orleans — $2,500 · OtherUniversity of New OrleansSpoleto — $2,000 · OtherSpoletoSt Johns Cathedral — $1,500 · OtherSt Johns CathedralInstitute for Justice — $1,250 · OtherFriends of Library CofC — $1,000 · Other+16 more — $4,625 · Other+16 moreCHARLESTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA — $2,000 · Arts & CultureColour of Music — $200 · Arts & CultureFIRE — $500 · Human ServicesFULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING OF MCCORMICK SC INC — $150 · Housing & Shelter
Other$25,875Arts & Culture$2,200Human Services$500Housing & Shelter$150

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHARLESTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCatholic Charities of South Carolina — $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetColour of Music — $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPALMETTO PROJECT INC — $165 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCharleston Library Society — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING OF MCCORMICK SC INC — $150 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHISTORIC CHARLESTON FOUNDATION — $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHARLESTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA
  • Who funds FIRE
  • Who funds Catholic Charities of South Carolina
  • Who funds Colour of Music
  • Who funds PALMETTO PROJECT INC
  • Who funds Charleston Library Society
  • Who funds FULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING OF MCCORMICK SC INC
  • Who funds HISTORIC CHARLESTON FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Coastal Community Foundation of South Carolina IncSC17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Coastal Community Foundation of South Carolina Inc · John M Rivers Jr Foundation · Post and Courier Foundation · Central Carolina Community Foundation · The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jane and Sykes Wilford Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph