Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Jan and Mike Bradstreet Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$19k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 43% of JAN AND MIKE BRADSTREET FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$3,650
Median grant
1
States reached
$749k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
3F RANCH & BOARDING$5,000
HIS HOUSE OUTREACH MINISTRIES$5,000
COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF OKLA$3,650
OK BAPTIST HOMES FOR CHILDREN$3,000
LITTLE LIGHT MINISTRIES$2,647
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–22, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 58% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%HOUSE OF HEALING: $3k → 9%SISU YOUTH INC: $4k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

47%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$46k · 4 repeat orgs$52k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +194% since the first grant, against -6% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
10

Total granted

$46k
$43k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+194%
-6%

Still filing today

50%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’22’23’24
Human ServicesReligionHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OB
    OK BAPTIST HOMES FOR CHILDREN
    4× · 2019–2024 · $18k
  • HIS HOUSE OUTREACH MINISTRIES INC DBA SHE BREWS COFFEE & TRANSITION PROG
    3× · 2019–2024 · $15k · revenue +194%
  • JD
    JOHN DALY MAJOR ED FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $8k

Funded once

  • EF
    EDMOND FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • TH
    THE HUGS PROJECT INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue -53%
  • OC
    OKLAHOMA CITY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOU
    one grant, 2022 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
His House Inc
Religion
2
Misfit Mission

Misfits Mission purpose is to lead women to restoration in Christ through transitional living and godly counsel of Christian leaders.

Health
3
House of Hope

Assisting and housing females in recovery

4
Lifehouse Ministries Inc
Housing & Shelter
5
House of Refuge Faith Based
Human Services
6
House of Hope

We assist young mothers with housing and wrap around services.

Human Services
7
In His Loving Embrace Inc

Provide second change housing for homeless.

Human Services
8
Home for Homeless Women
9
Good Samaritan Mission Inc

To care for the needy, share the good news of jesus christ and change lives by providing counseling, life skill training, dignity gained through work and christ-centered discipleship.

10
Abbas House
Philanthropy
11
Crossroads for Her Ministry Inc

A non-denominational local christian ministry focused on providing christ-centered physical, mental and spiritual comfort to women in need. our mission is to present christ's love through the gospel as we endeavor to enrich the lives of…

Religion
12
Hilo Ministries Inc

To be an organization where people are excited to assist in the love and care of the orphan and those in foster care, as well as providing temporary housing and training for those in the worldwide missionary field.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jesus House Inc and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

OK BAPTIST HOMES FOR CHILDREN — $18,000 · OtherOK BAPTIST HOMES FOR CHILDRENEDMOND FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE — $10,000 · OtherEDMOND FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENEJOHN DALY MAJOR ED FOUNDATION INC — $7,500 · OtherJOHN DALY MAJOR ED FOUNDATION INC3F RANCH & BOARDING — $5,000 · Other3F RANCH & BOARDINGOKLAHOMA CITY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOU — $5,000 · OtherOKLAHOMA CITY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF OKLA — $3,650 · OtherCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF OKLACommunity Church — $2,500 · Other+1 more — $1,000 · OtherCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA — $25,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION …HIS HOUSE OUTREACH MINISTRIES INC DBA SHE BREWS COFFEE & TRANSITION PROG — $15,000 · Housing & ShelterHIS HOUSE OUT…THE HUGS PROJECT INCORPORATED — $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE HUGS PROJ…Jesus House Inc — $3,500 · Human ServicesJesus House I…SISU YOUTH INC — $3,500 · Human ServicesSISU YOUTH IN…House of Healing Inc — $2,500 · Human ServicesHouse of Heal…SAMARITAN'S PURSE — $5,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN…DEL WAY MINISTRIES INC — $5,000 · ReligionDEL WAY M…Little Light Ministries Inc — $5,147 · Crime & Legal
Other$52,650Philanthropy$25,000Housing & Shelter$15,000Human Services$14,500Religion$10,000Crime & Legal$5,147

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIS HOUSE OUTREACH MINISTRIES INC DBA SHE BREWS COFFEE & TRANSITION PROG — $15,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetLittle Light Ministries Inc — $5,147 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTHE HUGS PROJECT INCORPORATED — $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDEL WAY MINISTRIES INC — $5,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetJesus House Inc — $3,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSISU YOUTH INC — $3,500 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetHouse of Healing Inc — $2,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

El and Thelma Gaylord FoundationOK13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Feed the Children Inc · Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jan and Mike Bradstreet Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Jan and Mike Bradstreet Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Jan and Mike Bradstreet Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph