Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Jampart Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
35
Grants FY2024still arriving
12
States reached
$436k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Philanthropy$3.8MPublic Benefit$1.8MCommunity Improvement$1.0MEnvironment$817kArts & Culture$731kEducation$552kCrime & Legal$450kHuman Services$404kOther$0
02FY2024 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $165k
  • $50k–250k26 grants · $2.3M
  • $250k+3 grants · $986k
$75,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$80M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PA ALLIANCE FOUNDATION$436,000
TIDES FOUNDATION$300,000
FREEDOM READS$250,000
MICHIGAN CIVIC EDUCATION FUND$200,000
CARBON LEADERSHIP FORUM$155,000
LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORP$150,000
ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE ATLANTA$135,000
AMALGAMATED CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$125,000
THE BOSTON FOUNDATION$110,000
GOUCHER COLLEGE$105,000
MARYLAND LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FUND$100,000
ESPERANZA ACADEMY$100,000
Individual grant recipient$100,000
WISCONSIN CENTER FOR INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM$100,000
NEW ENGLAND GRASSROOTS ENVIRONMENT FUND$100,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $1.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $86k → 11%FREEDOM READS: $250k → 12%ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE ATLANTA: $135k → 9%CENTER FOR RURAL STRATEGIES: $75k → 29%YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $68k → 11%FREEDOM READS: $150k → 12%YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $45k → 11%MASSACHUSETTS CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK: $65k → 16%CITIZEN SCIENCE LAB: $175k → 11%CENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES: $40k → 19%CITIZEN SCIENCE LAB: $75k → 11%CENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES: $40k → 19%CITIZEN SCIENCE LAB: $15k → 11%CITIZEN SCIENCE LAB: $10k → 11%SOCIAL INNOVATION FORUM: $130k → 16%MASSACHUSETTS CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK: $60k → 16%MASSACHUSETTS CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK: $31k → 16%FAMILY NURTURING CENTER OF MASSACHUSETTS: $25k → 16%FAMILY NURTURING CENTER OF MASSACHUSETTS: $25k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
NV
PA
CT
CA
KY
MD
NM
DC
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.8M · 24 repeat orgs$2.8M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against -12% for the ones you funded once.

24 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
21

Total granted

$4.8M
$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
-12%

Still filing today

96%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.4M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureEnvironmentCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PA
    PA Alliance Foundation
    4× · 2021–2024 · $711k · revenue +353%
  • LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $617k · revenue +6%
  • GA
    GEORGIA ALLIANCE EDUCATION FUND INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $475k · revenue +911%

Funded once

  • BF
    BSA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $130k · revenue -47%
  • SOCIAL INNOVATION FORUM INC
    one grant, 2023 · $130k · revenue -12%
  • EM
    EQUALITY MICHIGAN
    one grant, 2022 · $115k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Washington Area Community Investment Fund Inc

The washington area community investment fund (wacif) is a nonprofit community loan fund focused on increasing equity and economic opportunity in the washington, dc area's underserved communities. wacif's mission is driven is driven by…

—
2
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
3
Council for Court Excellence

Council for court excellence's (cce's) mission is to bring people together to conduct research, educate, and advocate to make d.c.'s unique legal systems more just, equitable, and accountable to the community.

—
4
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
5
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
6
Activate Global Inc

Activate empowers scientists to reinvent the world by bringing their research to market. activate partners with u.s. based funders, research institutions, and other pillars of the hard technology community to help entrepreneurial…

Environment
7
Accion International

Our mission is to create a fair and inclusive economy where underserved people have quality financial choices and opportunities to improve their economic well-being. we find and help build innovative companies with the potential to reach…

International
8
Climate Leadership Council Inc

To develop and promote a carbon dividends framework - based on carbon fees whose revenues are rebated to citizens through dividends - as the most cost-effective, equitable, and politically viable climate solution.

Environment
9
Act for Alexandria

Amplify the work of our community by bringing people and resources together.

Community Improvement
10
Upturn Inc

Upturn advances equity and justice in the design, governance, and use of technology.

—
11
Association of Washington Cities

The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

—
12
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Local Initiatives Support Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Friends of the Jerusalem Youth Chorus. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsEnvironmental Conservation …Jewish Community Organizati…Independent K-12 SchoolsYouth Development ServicesCommunity Arts CentersChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Developmental Disabilities …Community FoundationsPolicy Research and Advocacy
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%6%<5yr14%19%5–10yr19%23%10–20yr16%34%20–35yr13%9%35–55yr16%9%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%7%<5yr14%20%5–10yr19%15%10–20yr16%40%20–35yr13%11%35–55yr16%7%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/56
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,509

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

56 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 56 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
56/56
Grantees still filing
26/56
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Boston Foundation Inc — $2,646,000 · PhilanthropyBoston Foundation IncTIDES FOUNDATION — $300,000 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOUNDATIONDRAPER RICHARDS KAPLAN FOUNDATION — $250,000 · PhilanthropyDRAPER RICHARDS KAPLAN FOUNDATIONAmalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc — $250,000 · PhilanthropyAmalgamated Charitable Foundation In…+3 more — $173,000 · PhilanthropyFREEDOM READS INC — $400,000 · Human ServicesFREEDOM READS I…THE CITIZEN SCIENCE LAB — $275,000 · Human ServicesTHE CITIZEN SCI…YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH — $199,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHR…MASSACHUSETTS CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK INC — $156,000 · Human ServicesMASSACHUSETTS C…ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE ATLANTA INC — $135,000 · Human ServicesASIAN AMERICANS…SOCIAL INNOVATION FORUM INC — $130,000 · Human ServicesSOCIAL INNOVATI…CENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES INC — $80,000 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER FOR RURAL STRATEGIES INC — $75,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY NURTURING CENTER OF MASSACHUSETTS INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesLAWRENCE COMMUNITYWORKS INC — $325,000 · OtherLAWRENCE COMMUNITYWORKS…CARBON LEADERSHIP FORUM — $155,000 · OtherCARBON LEADERSHIP FORUMEQUALITY MICHIGAN — $115,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $100,000 · OtherWISCONSIN CENTER FOR INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM — $100,000 · OtherRESIST INC — $100,000 · OtherNEW VENTURE FUND — $200,000 · OtherNEW VENTURE FUNDMARYLAND LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FUND INC — $150,000 · OtherMARYLAND LEAGUE OF CONS…NEW ENGLAND GRASSROOTS ENVIRONMENT FUND INC — $100,000 · OtherTHE CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER INC — $175,000 · OtherTHE CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENT…PASTORS UNITED COMMUNITY ADVOCACY INC — $100,000 · Other+16 more — $671,316 · Other+16 moreGEORGIA ALLIANCE EDUCATION FUND INC — $475,000 · EducationGEORGIA ALLI…GOUCHER COLLEGE — $190,000 · EducationGOUCHER COLL…STEM CODING LAB INC — $175,000 · EducationSTEM CODING …SPOTLIGHT PA — $100,000 · EducationSPOTLIGHT PAESPERANZA ACADEMY INC — $100,000 · EducationESPERANZA AC…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF COMBATANTS FOR PEACE INC — $50,000 · EducationYouth Guidance — $50,000 · EducationCODE IN THE SCHOOLS INC — $50,000 · Education+2 more — $7,000 · EducationLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION — $617,000 · Community ImprovementLOCAL INIT…ALTERNATIVES FOR COMMUNITY AND ENVIRONMENT INC — $125,000 · Community ImprovementALTERNATIV…ASIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL — $100,000 · Community ImprovementASIAN COMM…FUSION PARTNERSHIP INC — $81,000 · Community ImprovementFUSION PAR…ENTREPRENEURSHIP FOR ALL INC — $60,000 · Community ImprovementENTREPRENE…+1 more — $15,000 · Community ImprovementPA Alliance Foundation — $711,000 · Civil RightsPA Allian…MICHIGAN CIVIC EDUCATION FUND — $200,000 · Civil RightsMICHIGAN …BSA FOUNDATION — $130,400 · Arts & CultureNEWS REVENUE HUB INC — $100,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN JOURNALISM PROJECT INC — $100,000 · Arts & CultureBALTIMORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $100,000 · Arts & CultureAssemble Inc — $100,000 · Arts & CultureFriends of the Jerusalem Youth Chorus — $50,000 · Arts & Culture
Philanthropy$3,619,000Human Services$1,500,000Other$2,291,316Education$1,197,000Community Improvement$998,000Civil Rights$911,000Arts & Culture$580,400

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBoston Foundation Inc — $2,646,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetPA Alliance Foundation — $711,000 over 4y, 6.2% of budgetLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION — $617,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGEORGIA ALLIANCE EDUCATION FUND INC — $475,000 over 4y, 20% of budgetFREEDOM READS INC — $400,000 over 2y, 6.9% of budgetLAWRENCE COMMUNITYWORKS INC — $325,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION — $300,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CITIZEN SCIENCE LAB — $275,000 over 4y, 15% of budgetDRAPER RICHARDS KAPLAN FOUNDATION — $250,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetAmalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc — $250,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND — $200,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMICHIGAN CIVIC EDUCATION FUND — $200,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH — $199,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetGOUCHER COLLEGE — $190,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER INC — $175,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetSTEM CODING LAB INC — $175,000 over 4y, 5.7% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK INC — $156,000 over 3y, 87% of budgetMARYLAND LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FUND INC — $150,000 over 2y, 6.7% of budgetASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE ATLANTA INC — $135,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetBSA FOUNDATION — $130,400 over 1y, 9.0% of budgetSOCIAL INNOVATION FORUM INC — $130,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetALTERNATIVES FOR COMMUNITY AND ENVIRONMENT INC — $125,000 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetPASTORS UNITED COMMUNITY ADVOCACY INC — $100,000 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetSPOTLIGHT PA — $100,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetBALTIMORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNEWS REVENUE HUB INC — $100,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetAMERICAN JOURNALISM PROJECT INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBALTIMORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $100,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAssemble Inc — $100,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetNEW ENGLAND GRASSROOTS ENVIRONMENT FUND INC — $100,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetRESIST INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetESPERANZA ACADEMY INC — $100,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetASIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL — $100,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetFUSION PARTNERSHIP INC — $81,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES INC — $80,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR RURAL STRATEGIES INC — $75,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CITIZENSHIP — $75,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetBALTIMORE CORPS INC — $75,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAdvanced Energy Institute — $61,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetENTREPRENEURSHIP FOR ALL INC — $60,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF COMBATANTS FOR PEACE INC — $50,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetYouth Guidance — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY NURTURING CENTER OF MASSACHUSETTS INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSILVER LINING MENTORING INC — $50,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetFriends of the Jerusalem Youth Chorus — $50,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE PARENTS CIRCLE - FAMILIES FORUM — $50,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetCODE IN THE SCHOOLS INC — $50,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetBlack Women Build - Baltimore Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boston Foundation IncTides FoundationAmalgamated Charitabl…New Venture FundCummings Foundation G…ImpactassetsincEastern Bank Foundati…Combined Jewish Phila…Rockefeller Philanthr…Silicon Valley Commun…Barr FoundationAnnie E Casey Foundat…
Boston Foundation IncMA36.7× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Tides Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · New Venture Fund · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Impactassetsinc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Barr Foundation · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jampart Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Act Lawrence Inc — 44% of income from government
  • Center for Urban Families Inc — 36% of income from government
  • Baltimore Corps Inc — 15% of income from government
  • Freedom Reads Inc — 12% of income from government
  • Baltimore Symphony Orchestra Inc — 11% of income from government
  • Black Women Build - Baltimore Inc — 10% of income from government
  • Silver Lining Mentoring Inc — 10% of income from government
  • Lawrence Communityworks Inc — 9% of income from government
  • Bsa Foundation — 9% of income from government
  • Youth Development Organization Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Fusion Partnership Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Entrepreneurship for All Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Resist Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Goucher College — 0% of income from government
  • Boston Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Jampart Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Jampart Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines