· Private foundation
James Starr Moore Memorial Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 45% of JAMES STARR MOORE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k28 grants · $84k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $243k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $186k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA | $75,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD S E & N FLORIDA | $60,000 |
| ROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC | $50,500 |
| VISITING NURSE HEALTH SYSTEM INC | $35,000 |
| COMPASSION & CHOICES OF COLORADO | $25,000 |
| PIEDMONT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC | $25,000 |
| COOPERATION FOR ASSISTANCE & RELIEF (CARE) | $20,000 |
| HEALTH IMPERATIVES INC | $20,000 |
| GRADY HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| MEHER FUND INC | $20,000 |
| MEALS ON WHEELS ATL | $20,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHEAST INC | $15,300 |
| CAMBODIAN CHILDS DREAM ORGANIZATION | $12,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE INC | $11,000 |
| CRAFT EMERGENCY RELIEF FUND | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $121k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.
62 repeat relationships — 41 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHEAST INC4× · 2022–2025 · $685k · revenue +30%- PHPiedmont Healthcare Foundation Inc8× · 2017–2025 · $226k · revenue +13%
- RWROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC4× · 2022–2025 · $206k · revenue +14%
Funded once
- PPPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SE & N FLone grant, 2021 · $1.0M
- FAFORWARD ARTS FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $38k · revenue +130%
- ICIDA CASON CALLAWAY FOUNDATIONone grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue -51%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To enhance the health status of those we serve in partnership with medical staff and other community organizations by providing wellness services, health education, training, and access to safe high quality health care services.
To provide healthcare marked by compassion and sustainable excellence in a progressive environment, guided by physicians, delivered by exceptional professionals, and inspired by the communities we serve.
Navicent health's mission is to elevate health and well-being through compassionate care for all. our values are integrity, respect, ownership, and caring. navicent health, inc. is a nonprofit corporation whose primary purpose is to serve…
Leading the creation and advancement of health equity we exist to improve the health and well-being of individuals and communities, increase the diversity of the health professional and scientific workforce, and address primary health care…
To make kids better today and healthier tomorrow.
ACP is a group committed to identifying and providing leadership on selected issues important to driving the economic development of the city of Atlanta and for which the ACP's active involvement will make a major difference. The ACP has a…
Our mission is to create thriving communities by helping nonprofits succeed. our work revolves around four primary areas of focus.1. we are a hub for social innovation 2. we are a capacity accelerator for organizations and their people3.…
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The mission of piedmont athens regional medical center is to improve the lives and health of those we touch.
The corporation is a voluntary association of individuals and organizations the purposes of which are to upgrade and advance the atlanta metropolitan area in population, commerce and finance; to effect civic and social improvements; to…
The mission of augusta health is to strengthen the health and well-being of all people in our communities.
To provide healthcare marked by compassion and sustainable excellence in a progressive environment, guided by physicians, delivered by exceptional professionals, and inspired by the communities we serve.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Grady Health Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 19% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
66 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 66 of the 108 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds VISITING NURSE HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHEAST INC ↗
- Who funds Piedmont Healthcare Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds ROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds EARTH University Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds MEHER FUND INC ↗
- Who funds THE ATLANTA GIRLS' SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds MIDTOWN ASSISTANCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds CRAFT EMERGENCY RELIEF FUND INC ↗
- Who funds HEALTH IMPERATIVES INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION WESTERN HEMISPHERE REGION ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds FORWARD ARTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HOLLINS UNIVERSITY CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds IDA CASON CALLAWAY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MS FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds Meridian Education Resource Group Inc ↗
- Who funds OPEN HAND ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA LYRIC THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds Hospice of Southern Maine ↗
- Who funds Actors Express Inc ↗
- Who funds Feminist Womens Health Center Inc ↗
- Who funds One Hundred Miles Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · AEC Trust · The Imlay Foundation Inc · The Sartain Lanier Family Foundation Inc · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Atlanta Inc · Tw Marian W Ottley Atlanta Main · Atl Fdn-W Peters Main · The Scott Hudgens Family Foundation Inc · Ryan Ida Alice Tuw Main · Tull Charitable Foundation Inc · Tr Uw Charles I Branan
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization James Starr Moore Memorial Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Health Imperatives Inc — 79% of income from government
- A Safe Place Inc — 45% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to James Starr Moore Memorial Foundation?
Find your warmest path to James Starr Moore Memorial Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.