Skip to content

· Private foundation

James P Gordon Trust Xxxxx2002

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$41k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0178% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$63kCivil Rights$45kHealth$40kAnimals$35kHuman Services$31kRecreation & Sports$27kReligion$16kEducation$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,129
Median grant
1
States reached
$660k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YATES COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY$4,129
YATES PERFORMING ARTS$4,129
YATES CULTURAL AND RECREATIONAL RESOURCE$4,129
YATES COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL$4,129
Individual grant recipient$4,129
SAFE HARBORS OF THE$4,129
KEUKA COMFORT CARE HOME$4,129
Individual grant recipient$4,129
LIVING WELL MISSION$4,129
YATES COUNTY HISTORY CENTER$4,129
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LIVING WELL MISSION: $5k → 15%LIVING WELL MISSION: $4k → 15%LIVING WELL MISSION: $4k → 15%LIVING WELL MISSION: $4k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$302k · 13 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against -54% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
7

Total granted

$302k
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
-54%

Still filing today

31%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YC
    YATES CULTURAL & RECREATIONAL RESOURCES INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $27k · revenue +93%
  • YC
    YATES COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $26k · revenue +45%
  • LW
    LIVING WELL MISSION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $17k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • SS
    SOLDIERS & SAILORS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • KC
    KEUKA COLLEGE
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +1%
  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yates County Chamber of Commerce Inc

Promotes business through programs, services and events; addresses critical community issues and advocates responsible economic growth by bringing community leaders together.

—
2
Keuka Housing Council Inc

To improve the quality and quantity of housing in yates county.

Housing & Shelter
3
Chemung-Schuyler Counties Chapter Nysarc Inc

The arc of chemung-schuyler promotes and protects the human rights of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities, and actively supports their full inclusion and participation in the community throughout their lifetimes.

—
4
Genesee-Orleans Counties Chapter Nysarc Inc

The genesee-orleans counties chapter, nysarc, inc. is a not-for-profit human service agency that offers support, advocacy and a variety of services and opportunities primarily for individuals with disabilities and their families to pursue…

—
5
Northern York County Historical & Preservation Society
—
6
Nysarc Inc Herkimer County Chapter D/B/a Arc Herkimer

We envision arc herkimer as the premier service provider and resource for people with disabilities, and others in our community partnership of caring people committed to excellence, united by values and goals, directed toward unprecedented…

—
7
Nysarc Inc Cattaraugus Niagara Counties Chapter

The primary exempt purpose of this organization is to provide training and residential services to assist in the development of the mentally and physically disabled. we assist the people we serve through a continuum of service that fosters…

—
8
Genesee-Livingston-Orleans-Wyoming Counties Nysarc Inc D/B/a Arc Glow

To improve the quality of life for persons with developmental disabilities in every manner possible.

Human Services
9
Schuyler County Community Foundation
Philanthropy
10
Chautauqua Adult Day Care Centers Inc

The agency's mission is to provide a program of services for frail or impaired older adults in a secure group setting, enhancing quality of life, delaying institutionalization and providing respite for caregivers.

Human Services
11
Ontario County Historical Society

Provide various educational, cultural, and museum programs and services to area residents and tourists in order to promote an appreciation of ontario county, ny.

—
12
Share-a-Home of Yadkin County Inc

Independent living arrangements: a supportive housing opportunity is provided for elderely persons to live independently which otherwise would require institutional care.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yates Cultural & Recreational Resources Inc; the most unlike its peers is Living Well Mission. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAFE HARBORS OF THE: $45,065 · OtherSAFE HARBORS OF THEIndividual grant recipient: $35,065 · OtherIndividual grant recipientYATES COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $34,816 · OtherYATES COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETYYATES PERFORMING ARTS: $30,191 · OtherYATES PERFORMING ARTSIndividual grant recipient: $30,065 · OtherIndividual grant recipientYATES COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL INC: $26,191 · OtherYATES COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL INCPENN YAN UNITED METHODIST: $12,227 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherSOLDIERS & SAILORS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $9,748 · OtherDUNDEE CHILDRENS CENTER INC: $9,000 · Other+4 more: $18,123 · Other+4 moreYATES CULTURAL & RECREATIONAL RESOURCES INC: $27,065 · Recreation & SportsLIVING WELL MISSION: $17,051 · Human ServicesKEUKA COMFORT CARE HOME INC: $15,691 · Housing & ShelterUR MEDICINE HOME CARE INC: $10,000 · HealthYates County Genealogical and Historical Society: $4,129 · Arts & CultureFINGER LAKES CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL INC: $2,500 · Arts & CultureKEUKA COLLEGE: $5,000 · Education
Other$260,491Recreation & Sports$27,065Human Services$17,051Housing & Shelter$15,691Health$10,000Arts & Culture$6,629Education$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYATES CULTURAL & RECREATIONAL RESOURCES INC: $27,065 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetYATES COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL INC: $26,191 over 6y, 3.8% of budgetLIVING WELL MISSION: $17,051 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetKEUKA COMFORT CARE HOME INC: $15,691 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetUR MEDICINE HOME CARE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetDUNDEE CHILDRENS CENTER INC: $9,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetKEUKA COLLEGE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYATES COUNTY CHAPTER NYSARC INC: $4,748 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFINGER LAKES CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL INC: $2,500 over 1y, 5.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YATES CULTURAL & RECREATIONAL RESOURCES INC ↗
  • Who funds YATES COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds LIVING WELL MISSION ↗
  • Who funds KEUKA COMFORT CARE HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds UR MEDICINE HOME CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds DUNDEE CHILDRENS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds KEUKA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds YATES COUNTY CHAPTER NYSARC INC ↗
  • Who funds Yates County Genealogical and Historical Society ↗
  • Who funds FINGER LAKES CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rochester Area Community FoundationNY17.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rochester Area Community Foundation · JM McDonald Foundation Inc · Joe and Sue Degeorge Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization James P Gordon Trust Xxxxx2002 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from James P Gordon Trust Xxxxx2002. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on James P Gordon Trust Xxxxx2002’s filings →

    More from the funding graph