Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

James & Minerva Weiss Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$42k
Granted FY2023
5
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What you fund
0161% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172023.

Health$87kPhilanthropy$72kArts & Culture$44kCrime & Legal$15kInternational$8kHuman Services$8kFood & Nutrition$7kCivil Rights$5kOther$155k
02FY2023 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k2 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $36k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$774k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY$14,000
BLEEDING DISORDERS ALLIANCE ILLINOIS$12,000
JEWISH UNITED FUND$10,000
CHICAGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$5,000
KOL HADASH CHOIR FUND$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ASPIRITECH: $2k → 8%ASPIRITECH: $2k → 8%ASPIRITECH: $2k → 8%ASPIRITECH: $2k → 8%ASPIRITECH: $2k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$398k · 27 repeat orgs$796 to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.

27 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2023, 22 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
3

Total granted

$398k
$796

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+4%

Still filing today

56%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Arts & CultureHealthInternationalCivil RightsPhilanthropyCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JU
    JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
    7× · 2017–2023 · $72k · revenue +13%
  • CS
    Chicago Symphony Orchestra
    7× · 2017–2023 · $38k · revenue +58%
  • SP
    SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $15k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • TJ
    THE JEWISH WOMEN'S ARCHIVE INC
    one grant, 2021 · $500 · revenue +4%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $250
  • SL
    SQUALL LINE PARTNERS 27-1668423
    one grant, 2017 · $46

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
2
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
3
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
4
Food Allergy Science Initiative Inc

To accelerate the development of breakthrough discoveries that will transform the lives of people living with food allergies.

5
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
6
Association for Computing Machinery Inc

We are an intl. scientific & educational org. dedicated to advancing art, science & technology.

Science & Tech
7
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
8
American Anthropological Association

To advance anthropology as the science that studies humankind in all its aspects, through archeological, biological, ethnological, and linguistic research; and to further the professional interest of american anthropologist, including the…

Social Science
9
American Society of International Law

To foster the study of international law and to promote international relations on the basis of law and justice.

International
10
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
11
Biotechnology Innovation Organization

The biotechnology innovation organization (bio) represents approximately 1,000 companies and organizations in washington dc, state capitals, and international fora. bio is founded on the principle that policy must nurture innovation in the…

12
American National Standards Institute

To enhance both the global competitiveness of u.s. business and the u.s. quality of life by promoting and facilitating voluntary consensus standards and conformity assessment systems, and safeguarding their integrity.

Public Benefit

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Jewish Committee and the most unlike its peers is Feeding America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $56,000 · OtherMULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETYHEMOPHILIA FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS — $48,000 · OtherHEMOPHILIA FOUNDATION OF ILLINOISAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION — $12,500 · OtherAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNIONPLANNED PARENTHOOD — $12,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY — $7,000 · OtherKOL HADASH CHOIR FUND — $7,000 · OtherFeeding America — $7,000 · Other+10 more — $16,796 · Other+10 moreNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $42,000 · HealthNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLERO…Bleeding Disorders Alliance Illinois — $36,600 · HealthBleeding Disorders Allia…ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $8,500 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RE…JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $72,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNITED FUND O…Chicago Symphony Orchestra — $37,742 · Arts & CultureChicago Symp…The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $3,000 · Arts & CultureThe United S…FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY — $1,500 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $1,500 · Arts & CultureSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $14,500 · Crime & LegalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $6,500 · InternationalFEDERATION OF AMERICAN SCIENTISTS — $1,250 · InternationalASPIRITECH NFP — $7,675 · Human Services
Other$166,296Health$87,100Philanthropy$72,000Arts & Culture$43,742Crime & Legal$14,500International$7,750Human Services$7,675

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $72,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $42,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Symphony Orchestra — $37,742 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBleeding Disorders Alliance Illinois — $36,600 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $14,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $8,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetASPIRITECH NFP — $7,675 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFeeding America — $7,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $6,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $4,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY — $1,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFEDERATION OF AMERICAN SCIENTISTS — $1,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH WOMEN'S ARCHIVE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
  • Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY
  • Who funds Chicago Symphony Orchestra
  • Who funds Bleeding Disorders Alliance Illinois
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds ASPIRITECH NFP
  • Who funds Feeding America
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
  • Who funds FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY
  • Who funds FEDERATION OF AMERICAN SCIENTISTS
  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE
  • Who funds THE JEWISH WOMEN'S ARCHIVE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization James & Minerva Weiss Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to James & Minerva Weiss Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to James & Minerva Weiss Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph