Skip to content

· Private foundation

James M Schoonmaker II Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
31
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$1.8M
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$16MHealth$4.1MArts & Culture$2.2MReligion$1.1MAnimals$600kEducation$308kEnvironment$180kYouth Development$150kOther$0
02FY2025 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $140k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $1.1M
  • $250k+8 grants · $7.3M
$50,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$163M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAILING FOUNDATION OF NEW YORK$1,840,000
NATIONAL SAILING HALL OF FAME & MUSEUM$1,010,000
NCH HEALTHCARE FDN$1,005,000
NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC$1,000,000
SAN FRANCISO CHALLENGE DBA AMERICAONE$1,000,000
GREAT LAKES HISTORICAL SOCIETY$750,000
US SAILING CENTER INC$490,000
NAPLES HISTORICAL SOCIETY$250,000
YOUTH SAILING FOUNDATION OF INDIAN RIVER$200,000
ORANGE BOWL COMMITTEE$180,000
OAKLIFF SAILING CENTER$168,000
INTERNATIONAL STAR CLASS YACHT RACING$100,000
SNIP COLLIER$100,000
COCUNUT GROVE SAILING CLUB INSTRUCTIONAL$75,000
GOLDEN PAWS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $130k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GOLDEN PAWS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC: $20k → 10%GOLDEN PAWS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC: $10k → 10%PAWS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC: $10k → 10%GOLDEN PAWS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC: $10k → 10%GOLDEN PAWS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC: $50k → 10%GUALDELUPE CENTER: $30k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
OH
PA
CT
RI
CA
VA
MD
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$23M · 28 repeat orgs$1.9M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
11

Total granted

$23M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+18%

Still filing today

75%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $588k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsEducationArts & CultureHealthAnimalsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NH
    NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +214%
  • TG
    THE GREAT LAKES HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    5× · 2021–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +167%
  • NH
    NAPLES HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $610k · revenue +363%

Funded once

  • NCH HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $1.0M · revenue +210% · 45% of their budget
  • YS
    YOUTH SAILING FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $150k
  • TG
    THE GREAT LAKES HISTORICAL
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Newburyport Maritime Society Inc

To protect, preserve and interpret the martime heritage of the lower Merrimack Valley region and how it relates to American History

Arts & Culture
2
The New York Yacht Club

To attract and bring together a dedicated group in yachting and naval members to share and foster their interest in yachting and yacht racing;(continue on schedule o)

—
3
The San Francisco Yacht Club

The organization is an exempt social club under irc section 501(c)(7), whose program service activities are organized and operated substantially for the pleasure & recreation of its members. all programs of the club are related to the…

—
4
Santa Cruz Sailing Foundation
Philanthropy
5
United States Sailing Association Inc

The organizations mission is to increase sailing participation and excellence through education, competition, and equal opportunity while upholding the principles of fair play, sportsmanship, and safety.

Recreation & Sports
6
Naples Yacht Club Inc

The naples yacht club is a private yacht and social club with a "by invitation only" membership policy. the club shall encourage the sport of yachting and provide excellent boating facilities and activities for its members. further, the…

—
7
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
8
Us Sailing Foundation of Martin County Inc
—
9
Northeast Harbor Fleet

The purpose of the northeast harbor fleet is to provide racing & cruising activities serving 427 members in northeast harbor, maine

—
10
Norwalk Seaport Association Inc

The norwalk seaport association, inc. offers a cultural, environmental, and historical journey to the norwalk islands. the sheffield island lighthouse and the light keeper's cottage provide a unique historical and educational venue which…

Arts & Culture
11
No Salt Sailing
Recreation & Sports
12
Newport Harbor Sailing Foundation

Promotion of amateur sailing

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Naples Botanical Garden Inc; the most unlike its peers is San Francisco Challenge dba AmericaOne. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/34
Grantees still filing
21/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Bella Mente Quantum Racing Association: $7,500,000 · Recreation & SportsBella Mente Quantum Racing AssociationUNITED STATES SAILING FOUNDATION: $2,000,000 · Recreation & SportsUNITED STATES SAILING FOUNDATIONTHE SAILING FOUNDATION OF NEW YORK INC: $1,865,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE SAILING FOUNDATION OF NEW YORK INCSan Francisco Challenge dba AmericaOne: $1,125,000 · Recreation & SportsSan Francisco Challenge dba AmericaOne+3 more: $255,000 · Recreation & SportsNCH HEALTHCARE FDN: $1,455,000 · OtherNCH HEALTHCARE FDNTHE GREAT LAKES HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $1,350,000 · OtherTHE GREAT LAKES HISTORICAL…US SAILING CENTER INC: $1,206,000 · OtherUS SAILING CENTER INCNAPLES HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $610,000 · OtherNAPLES HISTORICAL SOCIETY …INTERNATIONAL STAR CLASS YACHT RACING: $200,000 · Other+18 more: $998,000 · Other+18 moreNATIONAL SAILING HALL OF FAME & MUSEUM INC: $2,660,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL SAI…+3 more: $118,000 · Arts & CultureNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC: $1,542,000 · HealthNEIGHBORHOO…NCH HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC: $1,000,000 · HealthNCH HEALTHC…+2 more: $85,000 · HealthPATTY BAKER HUMANE SOCIETY NAPLES INC: $320,000 · AnimalsSNIP Collier Inc: $180,000 · AnimalsSTAND UP FOR ANIMALS: $50,000 · AnimalsOrange Bowl Committee Inc: $270,000 · EducationVMI Foundation: $18,000 · Education+3 more: $11,000 · EducationNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $175,000 · Environment+1 more: $5,000 · Environment
Recreation & Sports$12,745,000Other$5,819,000Arts & Culture$2,778,000Health$2,627,000Animals$550,000Education$299,000Environment$180,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBella Mente Quantum Racing Association: $7,500,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetNATIONAL SAILING HALL OF FAME & MUSEUM INC: $2,660,000 over 5y, 76% of budgetUNITED STATES SAILING FOUNDATION: $2,000,000 over 3y, 53% of budgetTHE SAILING FOUNDATION OF NEW YORK INC: $1,865,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC: $1,542,000 over 6y, 5.2% of budgetTHE GREAT LAKES HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $1,350,000 over 5y, 8.3% of budgetSan Francisco Challenge dba AmericaOne: $1,125,000 over 2y, 9.1% of budgetNCH HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC: $1,000,000 over 1y, 45% of budgetNAPLES HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $610,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetPATTY BAKER HUMANE SOCIETY NAPLES INC: $320,000 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetOrange Bowl Committee Inc: $270,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetSNIP Collier Inc: $180,000 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $175,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetNEW YORK YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION: $115,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetGolden PAWS Assistance Dogs Inc: $100,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetSAIL TO PREVAIL: $80,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetMYSTIC SEAPORT MUSEUM INC: $80,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSTAND UP FOR ANIMALS: $50,000 over 3y, 5.6% of budgetNATIONAL MARITIME HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $50,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetHERRESHOFF MARINE MUSEUM: $32,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetGuadalupe Center Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNEW ENGLAND SCIENCE & SAILING FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetROYAL PALM SAILING CLUB INC: $25,000 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetCOCONUT GROVE SAILING CLUB INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTeam Paradise Sailing Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetVMI Foundation: $18,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOMEWOOD CEMETERY HISTORICAL FUND: $6,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetTHE WATCH HILL CONSERVANCY: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetFLORIDA GULF COAST UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTAR LEGACY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetKAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEMORIAL AND LIBRARY ASSOCIATION OF WESTERLY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Bella Mente Quantum Racing Association ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL SAILING HALL OF FAME & MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES SAILING FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE SAILING FOUNDATION OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GREAT LAKES HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds San Francisco Challenge dba AmericaOne ↗
  • Who funds NCH HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC ↗
  • Who funds NAPLES HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds PATTY BAKER HUMANE SOCIETY NAPLES INC ↗
  • Who funds Orange Bowl Committee Inc ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH SAILING FOUNDATION OF INDIAN RIVER ↗
  • Who funds SNIP Collier Inc ↗
  • Who funds NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Golden PAWS Assistance Dogs Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAIL TO PREVAIL ↗
  • Who funds MYSTIC SEAPORT MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds STAND UP FOR ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MARITIME HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds HERRESHOFF MARINE MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds Guadalupe Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEW ENGLAND SCIENCE & SAILING FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ROYAL PALM SAILING CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds COCONUT GROVE SAILING CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds Team Paradise Sailing Inc ↗
  • Who funds VMI Foundation ↗
  • Who funds HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Richard and Ann Du Moulin FoundationNJ15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Richard and Ann Du Moulin Foundation · Kane Wallace Foundation · Douglas & Maria Devos Foundation · Lotz Family Foundation · Lyn & Margaret Comfort Charitable Foundation · Brooks-Mathews Foundation · Gubelmann Family Foundation Inc · The Meier and Linnartz Family Foundation · Ernst & Elfriede Frank Foundation Inc · Carlson Family Foundation · Collier Community Foundation Inc · The Rhode Island Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization James M Schoonmaker II Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from James M Schoonmaker II Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 120%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Mystic Seaport Museum Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Naples Botanical Garden Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Orange Bowl Committee Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Guadalupe Center Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
12get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on James M Schoonmaker II’s filings →

More from the funding graph