· Private foundation
Richard and Ann Du Moulin Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k35 grants · $28k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $36k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE SEAMEN'S CHURCH INSTITUTE OF NY AND NJ | $35,600 |
| SAILING FOUNDATION OF NEW YORK | $5,000 |
| SAIL 250 | $3,500 |
| LARCHMONT FRIENDS OF THE FAMILY | $3,000 |
| ACLU | $2,000 |
| NATIONAL MARITIME HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $1,000 |
| HERRESHOFF MARINE MUSEUM | $1,000 |
| DARTMOUTH COLLEGE | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| UNICEF | $1,000 |
| SUNY MARITIME COLLEGE | $1,000 |
| ADIRONDACK ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE | $750 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC | $750 |
| ADIRONDACK MOUNTAIN CLUB | $700 |
| NORTH COUNTRY PUBLIC RADIO | $600 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against -41% for the ones you funded once.
51 repeat relationships — 26 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TSTHE STORM TRYSAIL FOUNDATION9× · 2017–2025 · $30k · revenue +81%
- LFLarchmont Friends Of The Family9× · 2017–2025 · $20k · revenue +113%
- NMNATIONAL MARITIME HISTORICAL SOCIETY9× · 2017–2025 · $11k · revenue +56%
Funded once
AQUIDNECK ISLAND LAND TRUST5× · 2021–2025 · $1k · revenue -90%
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC4× · 2022–2025 · $1k · revenue -40%- URUKRAINE RELIEF4× · 2022–2025 · $1k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To attract and bring together a dedicated group in yachting and naval members to share and foster their interest in yachting and yacht racing;(continue on schedule o)
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The suny maritime foundation, inc. is the primary organization to raise and manage private financial support for suny maritime college. this support assists suny maritime to achieve its mission and vision while at the same time enriching…
To promote amateur sailing competition by conducting regional, national and international regattas and races, providing training, conducting conferences and meetings, and providing grants and services in furtherance thereof, and to…
See schedule onylcv is a non-partisan policy making and political action organization that works to make environmental protection a top priority with elected officials, decision-makers and the voters by evaluating incumbent performance and…
To conserve and steward long island's natural and historic lands, waters and environmental resources. through education, outreach and volunteerism, we connect people to nature and inspire a community conservation ethic.
Dutchess land conservancy (dlc) is dedicated to preserving the scenic, agricultural and environmental resources of dutchess county, new york, and the surrounding area. dlc, as a private non-profit land conservation organization, carries…
To preserve the unique character and natural resources of harvard.
To have a membership composed of yachting and boating enthusiasts of good character and all ages that is predominantly resident to local area, represents a broad spectrum of the community, and is appropriate in size for our facilities; to…
See schedule onylcvef's mission is to educate, engage and empower new yorkers to be effective advocates on behalf of the environment from clean energy and funding for parks, to solid waste and green buildings. first, we educate new yorkers…
The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…
The organizations mission is to increase sailing participation and excellence through education, competition, and equal opportunity while upholding the principles of fair play, sportsmanship, and safety.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Aquidneck Island Land Trust and the most unlike its peers is Lauri Strauss Leukemia Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 85 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE STORM TRYSAIL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Larchmont Friends Of The Family ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL MARITIME HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds HERRESHOFF MARINE MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds THE ADIRONDACK COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds THE SAILING FOUNDATION OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
- Who funds ADIRONDACK ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE INC ↗
- Who funds COMMON CAUSE ↗
- Who funds SAIL TO PREVAIL ↗
- Who funds LAURI STRAUSS LEUKEMIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNION SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds HUNGER TASK FORCE INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Larchmont-Mamaroneck Hunger Task Force Inc ↗
- Who funds NEPHCURE KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds ADIRONDACK MOUNTAIN CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds JOHNSBURG EMERGENCY SQUAD INC ↗
- Who funds OAKCLIFF SAILING INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds AQUIDNECK ISLAND LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds SOUNDWATERS INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Brooks-Mathews Foundation · James M Schoonmaker II Foundation · Kane Wallace Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Lotz Family Foundation · Lyn & Margaret Comfort Charitable Foundation · The Pamela Howard Family Foundation Inc · Ernst & Elfriede Frank Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Ibm International Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Express Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Richard and Ann Du Moulin Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Connecticut Foodshare Inc — 5% of income from government
- Soundwaters Inc — 4% of income from government
- Incarnation Center Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.