Skip to content

· Private foundation

James Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$143k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$130kEducation$123kHuman Services$101kReligion$91kInternational$56kCivil Rights$55kEmployment$40kPublic Benefit$16kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $130k
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$234k
Total assets

Anchored by a single position: about 95% of reported assets are held in Of Apple Inc.

Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DESIGN OUTREACH - 46-0779062$30,000
YOUNG AMERICANS FOR LIBERTY - 45-3503672$25,000
LIBERTY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$25,000
YOUNG AMERICANS FOR LIBERTY - 45-3503672$25,000
OPPORTUNITY OHIO$15,000
JOSEPH'S COAT - xx-xxx9798$10,000
YMCA OF CENTRAL OHIO - 31-4379594$5,000
THE ANGELWORKS FOUNDATION - 26-1489994$5,000
POLICY REFORM 93-4778346$2,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS - 13-3433452$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MOMS FOR AMERICA: $15k → 14%MOMS FOR AMERICA: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
OH
CA
VA
AZ
TN
NC
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

39%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$247k · 8 repeat orgs$391k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
31

Total granted

$247k
$288k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+26%

Still filing today

75%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 28% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $103k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPublic BenefitHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalPhilanthropyEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JC
    JOB CREATORS NETWORK FOUNDATION
    3× · 2021–2023 · $35k · revenue +48%
  • MF
    Moms for America Inc
    2× · 2021–2022 · $20k · revenue +74%
  • TB
    The Buckeye Institute
    2× · 2018–2020 · $10k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • RM
    Ronald McDonald House Charities of Cen Ohio
    one grant, 2017 · $60k
  • GARY SINISE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $57k · revenue +196%
  • SH
    STOCKHANDS HORSES FOR HEALING EIN 46-5760727
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
2
Federation for American Immigration Reform

The federation for american immigration reform's (fair) mission is to educate the public about the economic, sociological, environmental, demographic and other effects of mass immigration to the united states.

International
3
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
4
Just Capital Foundation Inc

Just capital's mission is to build a more just economy that works for all americans by helping companies improve how they serve all their stakeholders - workers, customers, communities, the environment, and shareholders - as defined by the…

Social Science
5
Free Press

Free press was created to give people a voice in the crucial decisions that shape our media. we believe that positive social change, racial justice and meaningful engagement in public life require equitable access to technology, diverse…

Arts & Culture
6
Constituting America Inc

Constituting america's mission is to educate students and adults about the constitution through the culture. constituting america's mission is to utilize the culture: film, internet, tv and social media to reach, educate and inform…

Education
7
Observer Research Foundation America

Organization mission the observer research foundation america orf america is an independent, non-partisan, and nonprofit organization in washington dc dedicated to addressing policy challenges facing the united states, india, and their…

International
8
Free Press Action Fund

Free press action fund fights for your rights to connect and communicate. we fight to save the free and open internet, curb runaway media consolidation, protect press freedom, and promote digital civil rights. we believe that change…

Civil Rights
9
National Civil Justice Institute

The objectives and goals of the institute shall be to receive and administer funds for the purpose of providing and supporting educational programs for lawyers, legal academics, and members of the judiciary, conferences and publications…

—
10
Center for Democracy and Technology

Advocating for public policies that advance democratic values in the digital age.

Civil Rights
11
The National Foundation for American Policy Inc

The national foundation for american policy is a non-profit, non-partisan organization dedicated to public policy research on trade, immigration, and other issues of national importance. the organization seeks to expand the debate over the…

Public Benefit
12
Committee to Protect Journalists Inc

The committee to protect journalists promotes press freedom worldwide and defends the right of journalists to report the news safely and without fear of reprisal. cpj ensures the free flow of news and commentary by taking action wherever…

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The Goodfellow Historical Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
14/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LIBERTY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $85,000 · OtherLIBERTY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHRonald McDonald House Charities of Cen Ohio: $60,000 · OtherRonald McDonald House Charities of Cen OhioYOUNG AMERICANS FOR LIBERTY - 45-3503672: $50,000 · OtherYOUNG AMERICANS FOR LIBERTY - 45-3503672DESIGN OUTREACH - 46-0779062: $30,000 · OtherDESIGN OUTREACH - 46-0779062STOCKHANDS HORSES FOR HEALING EIN 46-5760727: $25,000 · OtherSTOCKHANDS HORSES FOR HEALING EIN 46-5760727DESIGN OUTREACH EIN 46-0779062: $25,000 · OtherDESIGN OUTREACH EIN 46-0779062+32 more: $140,455 · Other+32 moreOPPORTUNITY OHIO INC: $73,000 · EducationOPPORTUNITY OHIO…NATIONAL SCHOOL BOARDS ASSOCIATION: $20,000 · EducationNATIONAL SCHOOL …GARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $57,000 · PhilanthropyGARY SINIS…JOB CREATORS NETWORK FOUNDATION: $35,000 · EmploymentMoms for America Inc: $20,000 · Human ServicesVISTA VILLAGE INC: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Public BenefitJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $2,000 · Public Benefit
Other$415,455Education$93,000Philanthropy$57,000Employment$35,000Human Services$20,000Housing & Shelter$10,000Public Benefit$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOPPORTUNITY OHIO INC: $73,000 over 7y, 26% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $57,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJOB CREATORS NETWORK FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetNATIONAL SCHOOL BOARDS ASSOCIATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMoms for America Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetThe Buckeye Institute: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetVISTA VILLAGE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMid-Ohio Foodbank: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR CHRISTIAN VIRTUE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL LEGAL AND POLICY CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OPPORTUNITY OHIO INC ↗
  • Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JOB CREATORS NETWORK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL SCHOOL BOARDS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Moms for America Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Buckeye Institute ↗
  • Who funds VISTA VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Mid-Ohio Foodbank ↗
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR CHRISTIAN VIRTUE ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donors Trust IncVA13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donors Trust Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization James Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from James Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on James Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph