Skip to content

· Private foundation

James F Causley Jr Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$100k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$1.3MPublic Benefit$683kHuman Services$346kCivil Rights$310kArts & Culture$188kInternational$110kCrime & Legal$36kPublic Safety & Disaster$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $86k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$3k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JUDICIAL WATCH$25,000
Individual grant recipient$21,000
NATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK LEGAL DEFENS$10,000
CONSERVATIVE PARTNERSHIP INSTITUTE$10,000
GRACE CENTER FOUNDATION$10,000
RETIREMENT FUND FOR RELIGIOUS$10,000
DOMINICAN SISTERS OF MARY$5,000
ST WILLIAM CHURCH$3,000
SERVANTS OF JESUS$1,000
AMERICAN CORNERSTONE INSTITUTE$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
ST JOHN THE EVANGELIST PARISH$1,000
NATIONAL LEGAL AND POLICY CENTER$1,000
SOLANUS CASEY CENTER$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 56% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FRANCISCAN MISSIONARY SISTERS OF: $25k → 8%FRANCISCAN MISSIONARY SISTERS: $22k → 16%JUDICIAL WATCH: $100k → 14%CATHOLIC FAITH APPEAL: $25k → 9%GRACE CENTER FOUNDATION: $20k → 10%ST PETER PARISH: $350k → 10%ARCHDIOCESE OF DETROIT: $25k → 21%MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER: $50k → 9%FRANCISCAN MISSIONARY SISTERS OF: $25k → 8%JUDICIAL WATCH: $100k → 14%CATHOLIC FAITH APPEAL: $20k → 9%GRACE CENTER FOUNDATION: $20k → 10%ST HUBERT PARISH: $111k → 10%ARCHDIOCESE OF DETROIT: $25k → 21%MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER: $50k → 9%ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $15k → 11%JUDICIAL WATCH: $75k → 14%GRACE CENTER FOUNDATION: $20k → 10%CATHOLIC SERVICES APPEAL: $25k → 21%MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER: $40k → 9%ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $15k → 11%JUDICIAL WATCH: $60k → 14%GRACE CENTER FOUNDATION: $20k → 10%ST HUBERT PARISH: $37k → 10%CATHOLIC SERVICES APPEAL: $24k → 21%MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER: $40k → 9%JUDICIAL WATCH: $55k → 14%JUDICIAL WATCH: $50k → 14%ST HUBERT PARISH: $21k → 10%JUDICIAL WATCH: $50k → 14%JUDICIAL WATCH: $25k → 14%ST HUBERT PARISH: $15k → 10%JUDICIAL WATCH: $25k → 14%CONSERVATIVE PARTNERSHIP INSTITUTE: $20k → 14%ST HUBERT PARISH: $12k → 10%CONSERVATIVE PARTNERSHIP INSTITUTE: $20k → 14%CONSERVATIVE PARTNERSHIP INSTITUTE: $20k → 14%ST HUBERT PARISH: $12k → 10%ST HUBERT PARISH: $12k → 10%ST HUBERT PARISH: $12k → 10%RETIREMENT FUND FOR RELIGIOUS: $125k → 14%RETIREMENT FUND FOR RELIGIOUS: $125k → 14%RETIREMENT FUND FOR RELIGIOUS: $125k → 14%NATIONAL RETIREMENT FUND FOR: $125k → 14%NATIONAL RETIREMENT FUND FOR: $100k → 14%NATIONAL RETIREMENT FUND FOR: $100k → 14%ST JOAN OF ARC: $101k → 10%ST JOAN OF ARC: $100k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
IN
OH
CA
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
DC
LA
MS
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.2M · 54 repeat orgs$73k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

54 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 40 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

54
27

Total granted

$3.2M
$73k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+20%

Still filing today

35%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Civil RightsArts & CultureEducationPublic BenefitCrime & LegalInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JUDICIAL WATCH INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $540k · revenue +141%
  • MR
    MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER
    4× · 2017–2020 · $180k · revenue +7%
  • GC
    GRACE CENTER FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $100k · revenue +350%

Funded once

  • FM
    FRANCISCAN MISSIONARY SISTERS
    one grant, 2018 · $22k
  • CF
    CENTER FOR URBAN RENEWAL & EDUCATION
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +19%
  • THE HERITAGE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +63%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.

—
2
Liberty Justice Center

To advance economic and social liberties and a free enterprise society through strategic litigation, training, communication, activism and research. in addition, the center will train law students, lawyers and policy activists in the…

Crime & Legal
3
American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Iowa

The foundation works to defend and promote the constitution of the united states, focusing especially on the first, fourth, fifth, sixth, eighth, and 14th amendments. the foundation also works to defend and promote the constitution of the…

Civil Rights
4
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
5
International Republican Institute

Iri advances freedom and democracy worldwide by developing political parties, civic institutions, open elections, democratic governance and the rule of law.

Education
6
The Campaign Legal Center Inc

The nonpartisan campaign legal center advances democracy through law at the federal, state and local levels, fighting for every american's rights to responsive government and a fair opportunity to participate in and affect the democratic…

Crime & Legal
7
American Constitution Society for Law & Policy

The american constitution society for law and policy (acs) is a 501(c)(3) non-profit, non-partisan legal organization. through a diverse nationwide network of progressive lawyers, law students, judges, scholars, advocates, and many others,…

Education
8
Institute for Public Accuracy

To teach and disseminate educational materials to the public.

Arts & Culture
9
Americans United for Separation of Church and State

Americans united for separation of church and state is a nonpartisan educational and advocacy organization dedicated to advancing the separation of religion and government as the only way to ensure freedom of religion, including the right…

Civil Rights
10
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
11
Media Matters for America

Dedicated to comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the u.s. media.

Education
12
Pew Research Center

Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan "fact tank" that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping America and the world. Pew Research Center generates a foundation of facts that enriches the public dialogue and…

Social Science
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Southeastern Legal Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 81 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
20/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RETIREMENT FUND FOR RELIGIOUS: $385,000 · OtherRETIREMENT FUND FOR RELIGIOUSST PETER PARISH: $364,000 · OtherST PETER PARISHNATIONAL RETIREMENT FUND FOR: $325,000 · OtherNATIONAL RETIREMENT FUND FORIndividual grant recipient: $233,912 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK LEGAL DEFENS: $230,000 · OtherNATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK LEGAL DEFENSST JOAN OF ARC: $209,000 · OtherST JOAN OF ARCCATHOLIC FAITH APPEAL: $94,520 · Other+57 more: $389,675 · Other+57 moreJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $540,000 · Public BenefitJUDICIAL WATCH INC+1 more: $10,000 · Public BenefitMEDIA RESEARCH CENTER: $180,000 · Arts & CultureCENTER FOR URBAN RENEWAL & EDUCATION: $10,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $300 · Arts & CultureGRACE CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · InternationalRHEMA INTERNATIONAL INC: $9,500 · InternationalConservative Partnership Institute: $95,000 · EducationAMERICAN CORNERSTONE INSTITUTE INC: $8,000 · Education+1 more: $3,000 · EducationALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $60,000 · Civil RightsAmericans United for Life Inc: $10,000 · Civil RightsSECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION: $3,265 · Civil Rights+2 more: $4,000 · Civil RightsNATIONAL LEGAL AND POLICY CENTER: $27,000 · Crime & LegalPUBLIC INTEREST LEGAL FOUNDATION: $5,500 · Crime & Legal
Other$2,231,107Public Benefit$550,000Arts & Culture$190,300International$109,500Education$106,000Civil Rights$77,265Crime & Legal$32,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $540,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMEDIA RESEARCH CENTER: $180,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetGRACE CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetConservative Partnership Institute: $95,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL LEGAL AND POLICY CENTER: $27,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetAmericans United for Life Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCENTER FOR URBAN RENEWAL & EDUCATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRHEMA INTERNATIONAL INC: $9,500 over 7y, 4.4% of budgetAMERICAN CORNERSTONE INSTITUTE INC: $8,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMEN OF THE SACRED HEARTS MICHIGAN CHAPTER: $6,700 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetPUBLIC INTEREST LEGAL FOUNDATION: $5,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT VERITAS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION: $3,265 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDetroit Rescue Mission Ministries: $3,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHEASTERN LEGAL FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS UNION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR SACRED HEART HOME: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDisabled American Veterans: $1,050 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetYoung America's Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DAILY CALLER NEWS FOUNDATION: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds GRACE CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Conservative Partnership Institute ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL LEGAL AND POLICY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Americans United for Life Inc ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR URBAN RENEWAL & EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RHEMA INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CORNERSTONE INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds MEN OF THE SACRED HEARTS MICHIGAN CHAPTER ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC INTEREST LEGAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT VERITAS ↗
  • Who funds SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donors Trust IncVA21.3× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donors Trust Inc · John P & Kathryn G Evans Foundation · Farrell Family Foundation · Triad Foundation Inc · Barry-Bashur Foundation · Eric Javits Family Foundation · Sacred Family Causes Foundation · Ed Uihlein Family Foundation · The Sandra & Lawrence Post Family Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization James F Causley Jr Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from James F Causley Jr Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to James F Causley Jr Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to James F Causley Jr Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 81 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on James F Causley Jr Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph