Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

James & Ck Coles Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$246k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What you fund
0163% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172025.

Philanthropy$485kCivil Rights$135kHuman Services$40kEducation$10kHealth$1kArts & Culture$500Religion$500Animals$250Youth Development$250Other$403k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $1k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $95k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$881k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Logan Health Foundation$150,000
The Nationsl WW II Musuem$25,000
Child Bridge$25,000
Whitefish Presbyterian Church$20,000
The Skola Foundation$14,500
Whitefish Community Foundation$10,000
The Wave Center$500
Fractured Atlas$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Child Bridge: $25k → 18%Childbridge: $10k → 18%Child Bridge: $5k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MT
IL
NY
CA
VA
TN
LA
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$988k · 10 repeat orgs$53k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +102% since the first grant, against +48% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
14

Total granted

$988k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+102%
+48%

Still filing today

70%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $41k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyCivil RightsHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KR
    KALISPELL REGIONAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2025 · $450k · revenue +27%
  • WP
    WASHINGTON POLICY CENTER
    5× · 2017–2023 · $135k · revenue +140%
  • CB
    CHILD BRIDGE INC
    3× · 2017–2025 · $40k · revenue +324%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SKOLA
    one grant, 2024 · $6k · revenue -71%
  • FR
    Forest Ridge School
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $500

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
2
School's Out Washington

School's out washington (sowa) drives positive systemic change so that all washington's children and youth, particularly those furthest from justice, have access to a robust ecosystem of high-quality expanded learning programs.

Youth Development
3
Association of Washington Cities

The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

4
Seattle Biomedical Research Institute

We conduct fundamental infectious disease research to generate critical new knowledge about pathogens and their interactions with see schedule o for continuationhumans to enable the discovery and development of novel interventions,…

5
Washington State Council of Fire Fighters Employee Benefit Trust

It is the mission of the wscff employee benefit trust to provide the best possible plan benefits to its participating members and to enhance the plan as greater benefit options become available in the dynamic health care industry.

Membership Benefit
6
The Seattle School of Theology & Psychology

The mission of the seattle school of theology & psychology is to train people to become competent in the study of text, soul, and culture in order to serve god and neighbors through transforming relationships.

Education
7
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

8
Grist Magazine Inc

Grist is an independent, non profit media organization dedicated to reporting on climate change.

Environment
9
Washington State University Foundation

The mission of the Foundation is to promote, accept, and maximize private support for programs, initiatives, and properties of Washington State University and its regional campuses. The Foundation also prudently manages, invests, and…

Education
10
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
11
The Get Schooled Foundation

Get schooled helps young people get to college, find first jobs, and succeed in both. as america's only all-digital college and career counselor, we provide compelling, research-based content on our website and social media, as well as…

12
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Treehouse and the most unlike its peers is Dog Gone Seattle. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
13/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

KALISPELL REGIONAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION — $450,000 · PhilanthropyKALISPELL REGIONAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONWHITEFISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $35,000 · PhilanthropyWHITEFISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INCLogan Regional Healthcare Foundation — $300,000 · OtherLogan Regional Healthcare FoundationWhitefish Presbyterian Church — $47,000 · OtherWhitefish Presbyterian ChurchThe Nationsl WW II Musuem — $25,000 · OtherThe Nationsl WW II MusuemThe Skola Foundation — $14,500 · Other+17 more — $17,500 · OtherWASHINGTON POLICY CENTER — $135,000 · Civil RightsWASHINGTON POL…CHILD BRIDGE INC — $40,000 · Human ServicesTHE SKOLA — $6,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $3,750 · EducationTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN — $1,250 · HealthFRACTURED ATLAS INC — $500 · Arts & Culture
Philanthropy$485,000Other$404,000Civil Rights$135,000Human Services$40,000Education$9,750Health$1,250Arts & Culture$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetKALISPELL REGIONAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION — $450,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetWASHINGTON POLICY CENTER — $135,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetCHILD BRIDGE INC — $40,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetWHITEFISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $35,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGreater Seattle Business Assn Scholarship Fund — $6,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SKOLA — $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $3,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC — $3,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN — $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDOG GONE SEATTLE — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTREEHOUSE — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON TRAILS ASSOCIATION — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetStudents for Life Action Inc — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KALISPELL REGIONAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds WASHINGTON POLICY CENTER
  • Who funds CHILD BRIDGE INC
  • Who funds WHITEFISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Greater Seattle Business Assn Scholarship Fund
  • Who funds THE SKOLA
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC
  • Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN
  • Who funds FRACTURED ATLAS INC
  • Who funds IN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds DOG GONE SEATTLE
  • Who funds TREEHOUSE
  • Who funds WASHINGTON TRAILS ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds Students for Life Action Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

First Interstate BancSystem Foundation IncMT13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization James & Ck Coles Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 6%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph