· Private foundation
James & Edith Ross Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k9 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FELLOWS OF CONTEMPORARY ART | $10,283 |
| MOISHE HOUSE | $10,000 |
| CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CARE | $4,350 |
| BEVERLY HILLS POLICE FOUNDATION | $2,697 |
| RODEF SHALOM | $2,625 |
| MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY | $2,257 |
| FULFILLMENT FUND | $1,000 |
| LOS ANGELES COUNTY | $650 |
| HOLOCAUST MUSEUM | $500 |
| THE UCLA FOUNDATION | $500 |
| HAMMER MUSEUM | $250 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 37% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.
23 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CFCONCERN FOUNDATION2× · 2017–2019 · $17k · revenue +30%
- TATHE ARK ANTIQUES4× · 2021–2024 · $8k · revenue +7%
- TMTHE MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART LOS ANGELES2× · 2024–2025 · $7k · revenue +25%
Funded once
- BBHFAone grant, 2018 · $6k
- SDSAN DIEGO ZOOone grant, 2022 · $5k
- GMGRAMMY MUSEUMone grant, 2018 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…
We steward $1.5 billion in charitable assets through donor-advised funds, endowments, and other giving vehicles. partnering with 1,400 individuals, families, and organizations, we build enduring legacies and multigenerational impact. in…
The jonsson cancer center foundation is the single most important vehicle for raising private funds for cancer research at ucla and plays a key role in advancing cancer treatments and care. please see schedule o for additional information.
The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.
To support educational, research and public functions and programs of the riverside campus of the university of california.
The university of la verne offers a distinctive and relevant educational experience to a diverse population of traditional-age, adult, and graduate learners, preparing them for successful careers and a commitment to lifelong learning…
We are committed to breaking the cycle of poverty and creating programs that drive change. by addressing students' basic needs, including food, housing, utilities, transportation, and healthcare, we enable low-income students to enroll,…
The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…
California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…
The mission of the ucla alumni association is to enrich the lives of alumni and involve them in the future of ucla.
To advance the educational, cultural, scholarly, and creative activities and the role of community service of csula by increasing private funding, responsibly managing donated resources and supporting the university and its diverse and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is California Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Allen Matkins Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 91 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CONCERN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MOISHE HOUSE ↗
- Who funds FELLOWS OF CONTEMPORARY ART ↗
- Who funds THE ARK ANTIQUES ↗
- Who funds THE MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION COUNCIL OF GREATER LA ↗
- Who funds PROJECT ANGEL FOOD ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR THE AIDS MONUMENT ↗
- Who funds HILLEL 818 ↗
- Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GEFFEN PLAYHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds BEVERLY HILLS POLICE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VENICE FAMILY CLINIC ↗
- Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
- Who funds RETT SYNDROME RESEARCH TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds Pitzer College ↗
- Who funds Realize Impact ↗
- Who funds BRENTWOOD SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SHAREWELL ↗
- Who funds MAR VISTA FAMILY CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE MAPLE COUNSELING CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Peter H and Marietta K Bach Charitable Trust Conservatorship · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · California Community Foundation · Jewish Federation Council of Greater La · Hillel the Foundation for Jewish Campus Life · The Stanley & Joyce Black Family Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization James & Edith Ross Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.