Skip to content

· Private foundation

James and Cleo Hamilton Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$25k
Granted FY2025still arriving
44
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$31kEducation$30kFood & Nutrition$18kYouth Development$14kReligion$13kRecreation & Sports$7kHousing & Shelter$6kHealth$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 44 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$220
Median grant
7
States reached
$434k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Davis County Historical Society$3,000
Brilliant Detroit$3,000
Davis County Dollars for Scholars$2,500
Detroit Institute of Arts$2,000
Grinnell College$1,846
Metropolitan United Methodist$1,700
Forgotten Harvest$1,000
Westside Culturall and Athletic Clu$1,000
Gleaners$1,000
Ruth Ellis Center$550
Childrens Center$550
Clark Park Coalition$550
Living Arts$500
Cass Community Social Services$500
Planned Parenthood$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Covenant House: $111 → 17%Pope Francis Center: $600 → 21%Covenant House: $100 → 17%Pope Francis Center: $300 → 21%Covenant House: $100 → 17%Pope Francis Center: $200 → 21%Pope Francis Center: $200 → 21%Freedom House: $200 → 21%Freedom House: $200 → 21%Freedom House: $200 → 21%Freedom House: $50 → 21%Methodist Childrens Home Society: $100 → 21%Methodist Childrens' Home: $100 → 21%Methodist Childrens' Home: $100 → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
SD
IA
CA
VA
DE
NM
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$133k · 61 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against -5% for those funded once.

61 repeat relationships: 41 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

61
17

Total granted

$133k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
-5%

Still filing today

48%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $420 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionEnvironmentCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS
    6× · 2020–2025 · $12k · revenue +14%
  • FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $9k · revenue +2%
  • BRILLIANT DETROIT
    4× · 2022–2025 · $9k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • MM
    Metropolitan Methodist Church
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • EG
    Eden Gardens Community Aaaociation
    one grant, 2022 · $538
  • DR
    Detroit Rescue Mission Ministries
    one grant, 2021 · $200 · revenue -5%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Michigan Enviromental Council

Informing and educating the public and decision makers about environmental issues.

Environment
2
Michigan Legacy Art Park

Inspire awareness, appreciation and passion for michigan's history and stories, culture and environment through the arts.

Arts & Culture
3
Detroit Economic Growth Corporation

Promotion of activities to spur economic growth and revitalization in the city of detroit

—
4
Detroit Food Policy Council

The organization was founded by a group of concerned citizens, working in cooperation with the detroit city council, to shape food policy and to work for a more localized, more just, and environmentally friendly food system. the…

Food & Nutrition
5
Detroiters Working for Environmental Justice

The organization is known as the leader in the movement and is seen as the "go to" experts on environmental justice and sustainable redevelopment because of its knowledge and its network.

Health
6
Detroit Zoological Society

The mission of the Detroit Zoological Society (DZS) is to create meaningful connections between people, animals and the natural world so all can thrive. The vision of the DZS is to be a force for positive change in a world where animals…

Animals
7
Detroit Athletic Club

To create life-enriching experiences that build meaningful relations, foster personal and professional growth, and celebrate culture in the heart of detroit.

—
8
Detroit Regional Chamber

The chamber is the voice for business and works to power the economy for southeast michigan through public policy, advocacy and leading regional economic development and talent initiatives.

—
9
Endeavor Detroit

Endeavor Detroit is leading the high-impact entrepreneurship movement in Michigan and the wider Great Lakes region, catalyzing long-term economic growth by selecting, mentoring, and supporting the best high-impact entrepreneurs in the…

Community Improvement
10
Connect Detroit

To strategically solve problems through collaboratives with City of Detroit Departments, nonprofit organizations and local grant makers in order to secure the maximum federal, state, and national foundation dollars for the city Detroit.

Community Improvement
11
Michigan Humane Society

To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.

Animals
12
Business Leaders for Michigan

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Detroit Public Media; the most unlike its peers is Historic Boston Edison Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 82 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/36
Grantees still filing
28/36
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Davis County Dollars for Scholars: $13,000 · OtherDavis County Dollars for ScholarsGrinnell College: $11,076 · OtherGrinnell CollegeMetropolitan United Methodist: $7,700 · OtherMetropolitan United MethodistDAVIS COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $5,535 · OtherDAVIS COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETYCASS COMMUNITY SOCIAL SERVICES INC: $3,800 · OtherWESTSIDE CULTURAL & ATHLETIC CLUB: $3,550 · OtherCentral Detroit Christian: $3,150 · OtherPlanned Parenthood: $3,100 · OtherST JOSEPHS INDIAN SCHOOL: $3,000 · Other+50 more: $26,093 · Other+50 moreTHE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $12,000 · Arts & CultureTHE DETROIT INS…Living Arts: $4,000 · Arts & CultureLiving Arts+8 more: $3,041 · Arts & Culture+8 moreFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $8,600 · Food & NutritionFORGOTTEN HARV…GLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $8,500 · Food & NutritionGLEANERS COMMU…RUTH ELLIS CENTER: $3,150 · Recreation & SportsCLARK PARK COALITION: $2,900 · Recreation & SportsDOWNTOWN BOXING GYM YOUTH PROGRAM: $2,500 · Recreation & SportsBRILLIANT DETROIT: $8,500 · Youth DevelopmentPOPE FRANCIS CENTER: $1,300 · Human ServicesFREEDOM HOUSE DETROIT: $650 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE: $311 · Human ServicesMethodist Children's Home Society: $300 · Human ServicesLEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $100 · Human ServicesTHE GREENING OF DETROIT: $1,200 · EnvironmentSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $175 · Environment
Other$80,004Arts & Culture$19,041Food & Nutrition$17,100Recreation & Sports$8,550Youth Development$8,500Human Services$2,661Environment$1,375

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $8,600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $8,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBRILLIANT DETROIT: $8,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLiving Arts: $4,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCASS COMMUNITY SOCIAL SERVICES INC: $3,800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRUTH ELLIS CENTER: $3,150 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCLARK PARK COALITION: $2,900 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetDOWNTOWN BOXING GYM YOUTH PROGRAM: $2,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWEST SOLUTIONS INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPOPE FRANCIS CENTER: $1,300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GREENING OF DETROIT: $1,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HEAT AND WARMTH FUND: $900 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOMFIELD MAIN STREET INC: $700 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFREEDOM HOUSE DETROIT: $650 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDETROIT PUBLIC THEATRE: $620 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDETROIT PUBLIC MEDIA: $565 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMICHIGAN HISTORIC PRESERVATION NETWORK: $549 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDETROIT OPERA: $460 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHistorical Society of Michigan: $390 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDetroit Historical Society: $341 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $311 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREAT LAKES CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMethodist Children's Home Society: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHistoric Boston Edison Association: $280 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTHE ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONSERVANCY: $275 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPOPULATION CONNECTION: $250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDetroit Rescue Mission Ministries: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $175 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF AFRICAN AMERICAN HISTORY: $165 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPASSION & CHOICES: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS ↗
  • Who funds FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds GLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds BRILLIANT DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds Living Arts ↗
  • Who funds CASS COMMUNITY SOCIAL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds RUTH ELLIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CLARK PARK COALITION ↗
  • Who funds DOWNTOWN BOXING GYM YOUTH PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST SOLUTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds Preservation Detroit ↗
  • Who funds POPE FRANCIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE GREENING OF DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds THE HEAT AND WARMTH FUND ↗
  • Who funds BLOOMFIELD MAIN STREET INC ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM HOUSE DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT PUBLIC THEATRE ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT PUBLIC MEDIA ↗
  • Who funds MICHIGAN HISTORIC PRESERVATION NETWORK ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

DTE Energy FoundationMI35.4× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: DTE Energy Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · The Kresge Foundation · Ford Philanthropy · United Way for Southeastern Michigan · The Skillman Foundation · United Jewish Foundation · Flagstar Foundation Inc · WK Kellogg Foundation · Charles Stewart Mott Foundation · Marjorie and Maxwell Jospey Foundation · McGregor Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization James and Cleo Hamilton Family Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from James and Cleo Hamilton Family Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to James and Cleo Hamilton Family Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to James and Cleo Hamilton Family Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 82 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on James and Cleo Hamilton Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph