Skip to content

· Private foundation

James & Ck Coles Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$246k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$751kPublic Benefit$135kReligion$48kHuman Services$41kPhilanthropy$37kEducation$33kArts & Culture$26kInternational$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $1k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $95k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$881k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Logan Health Foundation$150,000
Child Bridge$25,000
The Nationsl WW II Musuem$25,000
Whitefish Presbyterian Church$20,000
The Skola Foundation$14,500
Whitefish Community Foundation$10,000
Fractured Atlas$500
The Wave Center$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Child Bridge: $25k → 18%Childbridge: $10k → 18%Child Bridge: $5k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
IL
NY
CA
VA
TN
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$988k · 10 repeat orgs$53k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +102% since the first grant, against +48% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
14

Total granted

$988k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+102%
+48%

Still filing today

70%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $41k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyCivil RightsHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KR
    KALISPELL REGIONAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2025 · $450k · revenue +27%
  • WP
    WASHINGTON POLICY CENTER
    5× · 2017–2023 · $135k · revenue +140%
  • CB
    CHILD BRIDGE INC
    3× · 2017–2025 · $40k · revenue +324%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SKOLA
    one grant, 2024 · $6k · revenue -71%
  • FR
    Forest Ridge School
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • IT
    IN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2018 · $500 · revenue +40%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
2
School's Out Washington

School's out washington (sowa) drives positive systemic change so that all washington's children and youth, particularly those furthest from justice, have access to a robust ecosystem of high-quality expanded learning programs.

Youth Development
3
Association of Washington Cities

The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

—
4
Seattle Biomedical Research Institute

We conduct fundamental infectious disease research to generate critical new knowledge about pathogens and their interactions with see schedule o for continuationhumans to enable the discovery and development of novel interventions,…

—
5
Washington State Council of Fire Fighters Employee Benefit Trust

It is the mission of the wscff employee benefit trust to provide the best possible plan benefits to its participating members and to enhance the plan as greater benefit options become available in the dynamic health care industry.

Membership Benefit
6
The Seattle School of Theology & Psychology

The mission of the seattle school of theology & psychology is to train people to become competent in the study of text, soul, and culture in order to serve god and neighbors through transforming relationships.

Education
7
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
8
Grist Magazine Inc

Grist is an independent, non profit media organization dedicated to reporting on climate change.

Environment
9
Washington State University Foundation

The mission of the Foundation is to promote, accept, and maximize private support for programs, initiatives, and properties of Washington State University and its regional campuses. The Foundation also prudently manages, invests, and…

Education
10
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
11
The Get Schooled Foundation

Get schooled helps young people get to college, find first jobs, and succeed in both. as america's only all-digital college and career counselor, we provide compelling, research-based content on our website and social media, as well as…

—
12
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Treehouse; the most unlike its peers is Dog Gone Seattle. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
13/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KALISPELL REGIONAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $450,000 · PhilanthropyKALISPELL REGIONAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONWHITEFISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 · PhilanthropyWHITEFISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INCLogan Regional Healthcare Foundation: $300,000 · OtherLogan Regional Healthcare FoundationWhitefish Presbyterian Church: $47,000 · OtherWhitefish Presbyterian ChurchThe Nationsl WW II Musuem: $25,000 · OtherThe Nationsl WW II MusuemThe Skola Foundation: $14,500 · Other+17 more: $17,500 · OtherWASHINGTON POLICY CENTER: $135,000 · Civil RightsWASHINGTON POL…CHILD BRIDGE INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesTHE SKOLA: $6,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $3,750 · EducationTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $1,250 · HealthIN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC: $500 · Religion
Philanthropy$485,000Other$404,000Civil Rights$135,000Human Services$40,000Education$9,750Health$1,250Religion$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKALISPELL REGIONAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $450,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetWASHINGTON POLICY CENTER: $135,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetCHILD BRIDGE INC: $40,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetWHITEFISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGreater Seattle Business Assn Scholarship Fund: $6,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SKOLA: $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $3,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC: $3,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTREEHOUSE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON TRAILS ASSOCIATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOG GONE SEATTLE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetStudents for Life Action Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KALISPELL REGIONAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON POLICY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CHILD BRIDGE INC ↗
  • Who funds WHITEFISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Greater Seattle Business Assn Scholarship Fund ↗
  • Who funds THE SKOLA ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds IN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds FRACTURED ATLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds TREEHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON TRAILS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds DOG GONE SEATTLE ↗
  • Who funds Students for Life Action Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

First Interstate BancSystem Foundation IncMT13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization James & Ck Coles Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from James & Ck Coles Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on James & Ck Coles’ filings →

More from the funding graph