Skip to content

· Private foundation

James a Simpson Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$17k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$50kReligion$45kPhilanthropy$23kEducation$18kAnimals$11kFood & Nutrition$1kEnvironment$895Arts & Culture$400
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$96k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MOTTINO FAMILY YMCA$6,250
THE VILLAGE CHURCH$5,000
RANCHO SANTA FE WOMEN'S FUND$2,300
UCSB FOUNDATION$1,500
HELEN WOODWARD ANIMAL CENTER$1,000
RANCHO COASTAL HUMANE SOCIETY$200
SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK$200
LIBRARY GUILD OF RANCHO SANTA FE$100
RANCHO SANTA FE SENIOR CENTER$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%RANCHO SANTA FE WOMEN'S FUND: $5k → 11%RANCHO SANTA FE WOMENS' FUND: $2k → 11%RANCHO SANTA FE WOMENS' FUND: $2k → 11%RANCHO SANTA FE WOMENS' FUND: $2k → 11%RANCHO SANTA FE WOMEN'S FUND: $2k → 11%RANCHO SANTA FE WOMENS' FUND: $2k → 11%RANCHO SANTA FE WOMEN'S FUND: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$145k · 15 repeat orgs$350 to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +122% since the first grant, against +97% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
2

Total granted

$145k
$350

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+122%
+97%

Still filing today

67%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsEnvironmentHuman ServicesFood & NutritionArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HW
    HELEN WOODWARD ANIMAL CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $10k · revenue +84%
  • LJ
    LA JOLLA COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL
    8× · 2017–2024 · $4k · revenue +43%
  • RC
    RANCHO COASTAL HUMANE SOCIETY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2k · revenue +141%

Funded once

  • SC
    SANTA CATALINA ISLAND CONSERVANCYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $250 · revenue +97%
  • CI
    CATALINA ISLAND HUMANE SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2019 · $100 · revenue +4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rancho Santa Fe Association

To protect, preserve, maintain and enhance the community, including all its natural resources, beauty, quality of life and community character. the association provides for maintenance of facilities, services for the general health, safety…

—
2
Santa Lucia Conservancy

To protect and steward in perpetuity the unique natural, cultural, and asthetic resources of the preserve and serve as a model of ecologically sustainable development to committees outside the preserve.

Environment
3
Humane Society of the Sierra Foothills

To prevent animal abuse and neglect, enforce the anti-cruelty laws of the State of California and promote the wellbeing of animals.

Animals
4
Zoological Society of San Diego

San diego zoo wildlife alliance is committed to saving species worldwide by uniting our expertise in wildlife care and conservation science with our dedication to inspiring passion for nature.

Animals
5
Santa Fe Conservation Trust

The santa fe conservation trust partners with our community to keep northern new mexico's living lands and people flourishing together. we protect culturally and environmentally significant landscapes, ignite people's passion for nature…

Environment
6
San Diego Society of Natural History

Conserving nature through science and discovery.

Arts & Culture
7
Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden

Rancho santa ana botanic gardens promotes botany, conservation, and horticulture to inspire, inform and educate the public and scientific community about california's native flora. the garden is devoted to the collection, cultivation,…

Environment
8
California Surf Museum

The California Surf Museum serves as an international repository and resource center on the lifestyle sport of surfing through capturing,preserving and chronicling its art, culture and heritage for the education and enjoyment of current…

Arts & Culture
9
San Francisco Zoological Society

To connect all people with wildlife, inspire caring for nature, and advance conservation action.

Animals
10
La Jolla Historical Society

La Jolla Historical Society celebrates the history and culture of this region along the waters edge through interdisciplinary programs, exhibitions, and research that challenge expectations. It balances contemporary and historic…

—
11
Mendocino Coast Humane Society

Caring for homeless animals, and finding homes for them through pet adoptions.

Animals
12
Rancho Los Cerritos Foundation

Support the rancho in preserving the historic site and providing educational opportunities about the areas cultural heritage.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rancho Santa Fe Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Nature Collective. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MOTTINO FAMILY YMCA: $48,750 · OtherMOTTINO FAMILY YMCAVILLAGE COMMUNITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $45,000 · OtherVILLAGE COMMUNITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHUCSB FOUNDATION: $13,500 · OtherUCSB FOUNDATIONLA JOLLA COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $4,000 · Other+5 more: $2,000 · OtherRancho Santa Fe Womens Fund: $18,400 · Human ServicesRancho Santa …HELEN WOODWARD ANIMAL CENTER: $9,500 · AnimalsRANCHO COASTAL HUMANE SOCIETY: $1,850 · AnimalsRANCHO SANTA FE FOUNDATION: $4,600 · PhilanthropyJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $1,300 · Food & NutritionRANCHO SANTA FE GARDEN CLUB: $545 · EnvironmentNATURE COLLECTIVE: $100 · EnvironmentCatalina Island Museum: $300 · EducationRANCHO SANTA FE HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $100 · Arts & Culture
Other$113,250Human Services$18,400Animals$11,350Philanthropy$4,600Food & Nutrition$1,300Environment$645Education$300Arts & Culture$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRancho Santa Fe Womens Fund: $18,400 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetHELEN WOODWARD ANIMAL CENTER: $9,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetRANCHO SANTA FE FOUNDATION: $4,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLA JOLLA COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $4,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetRANCHO COASTAL HUMANE SOCIETY: $1,850 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $1,300 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetRANCHO SANTA FE GARDEN CLUB: $545 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLIBRARY GUILD OF RANCHO SANTA FE: $500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCatalina Island Museum: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA CATALINA ISLAND CONSERVANCY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATURE COLLECTIVE: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCATALINA ISLAND HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRANCHO SANTA FE HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Rancho Santa Fe Womens Fund ↗
  • Who funds HELEN WOODWARD ANIMAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds RANCHO SANTA FE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LA JOLLA COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds RANCHO COASTAL HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds JACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds RANCHO SANTA FE GARDEN CLUB ↗
  • Who funds LIBRARY GUILD OF RANCHO SANTA FE ↗
  • Who funds Catalina Island Museum ↗
  • Who funds SANTA CATALINA ISLAND CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds NATURE COLLECTIVE ↗
  • Who funds CATALINA ISLAND HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds RANCHO SANTA FE HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rancho Santa Fe FoundationCA17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rancho Santa Fe Foundation · The San Diego Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization James a Simpson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from James a Simpson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on James a Simpson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph