Skip to content

· Private foundation

James a Childs and Susan M Childs Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$106k
Granted FY2024still arriving
31
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$31k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Education$46kHealth$32kHuman Services$27kPhilanthropy$18kRecreation & Sports$16kYouth Development$15kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kFood & Nutrition$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k29 grants · $65k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $41k
$2,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$31,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
BENZIE COUNTY CENTRAL SCHOOLS$6,000
THE ROCK OF KINGSLEY YOUTH CENTER$5,000
IDAHO FALLS SCHOOL DISTRICT 91$4,500
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF MI$4,000
NEWTON'S ROAD NORTHWEST$4,000
LSSU FOUNDATION$3,000
MUNSON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$3,000
LONG LAKE FOUNDATION$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER$2,000
TRAVERSE HEALTH CLINIC$2,000
UNITED WAY OF IDAHO FALLS & BONNEVILLE COUNTY$2,000
UNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST MICHIGAN$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%THE FATHER FRED FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%FATHER FRED FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%THE FATHER FRED FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%THE FATHER FRED FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%THE FATHER FRED FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%PEACE RANCH: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$194k · 27 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against -3% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
8

Total granted

$194k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
-3%

Still filing today

41%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsEducationPhilanthropyEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    THE ROCK OF KINGSLEY INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $13k · revenue +48%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST MICHIGAN
    4× · 2021–2024 · $8k · revenue ×12
  • MH
    MUNSON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONS
    4× · 2021–2024 · $8k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • EI
    EASTERN IDAHO COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue -3%
  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue -9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Michigan Trails & Greenways Alliance

Michigan trails & greenways alliance is the statewide voice for nonmotorized trail users, helping people build, connect and promote trails for a healthier and more prosperous michigan.

Arts & Culture
2
Top of Michigan Trails Council

We advocate and facilitate the development of a network of multipurpose recreational trails in Northern Lower Michigan.

Recreation & Sports
3
Iron Belle Trail Fund

The mission of the Michigan Trails Fund is to secure and distribute private resources that will be used to assist in the expansion and connectivity of the statewide non-motorized trail system which promotes access for all, healthy…

Recreation & Sports
4
Muskegon Community Health Project

We, mercy health and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. muskegon community health project is a member of mercy health and trinity health.

Health
5
Ausable Freshwater Center Incorporated

Advancing science and stewardship of adirondack waters.

Environment
6
Teton Valley Health Care Foundation

Teton Valley Health Care Foundation strives to build mutually beneficial relationships with community members, businesses, and guests that, through their generosity, support a healthy and thriving valley. (Continued on Schedule O). Through…

Health
7
Trinity Health - Michigan

We, trinity health-michigan and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. trinity health-michigan is a member of trinity health.

Health
8
Trinity Health Grand Haven Hospital

We, trinity health grand haven hospital and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.trinity health grand haven hospital is a member of trinity…

Health
9
Northern Arizona Healthcare Corporation

Improving health, healing people.

Health
10
North Shore Health Care Foundation

To expand equitable health care and healthy living in Cook County and champion solutions through funding, education and advocacy.

Health
11
National Kidney Foundation of Utah & Idaho

The National Kidney Foundation of Utah & Idaho, a major nonprofit health organization, is dedicated to preventing diseases of the kidney, improving the health and wellbeing of individuals and families affected by kidney disease, and…

Health
12
North Idaho Centennial Trail Foundation

To preserve and develop the north idaho centennial trail system and promote non-motorized trail connectivity throughout north idaho.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mt Holiday Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Rock of Kingsley Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
11/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $34,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF MI: $10,000 · OtherJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF MIBENZIE COUNTY CENTRAL SCHOOLS: $8,000 · OtherKINGSLEY AREA SCHOOLS: $8,000 · OtherCHILD & FAMILY SERVICES: $8,000 · OtherMUNSON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONS: $7,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $7,500 · OtherLSSU FOUNDATION: $7,500 · OtherIDAHO FALLS SCHOOL DISTRICT 91: $6,000 · OtherLONG LAKE FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · Other+16 more: $47,000 · Other+16 moreTRAVERSE HEALTH CLINIC AND COALITION: $8,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $4,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 · HealthPACE North: $1,000 · HealthTHE CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA FOUNDATION: $1,000 · HealthTHE AMYLOIDOSIS FOUNDATION: $1,000 · HealthGIFT OF LIFE INC: $1,000 · HealthTHE ROCK OF KINGSLEY INC: $13,000 · Youth DevelopmentNewtons Road Northwest: $10,000 · EducationUNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST MICHIGAN: $8,000 · PhilanthropyTETON VALLEY TRAILS & PATHWAYS INCORPORATED: $6,000 · EnvironmentFATHER FRED FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Human ServicesPARAKLESIS INC: $1,000 · Human Services
Other$159,500Health$17,000Youth Development$13,000Education$10,000Philanthropy$8,000Environment$6,000Human Services$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE ROCK OF KINGSLEY INC: $13,000 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetNewtons Road Northwest: $10,000 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST MICHIGAN: $8,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTRAVERSE HEALTH CLINIC AND COALITION: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMUNSON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONS: $7,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTETON VALLEY TRAILS & PATHWAYS INCORPORATED: $6,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetFATHER FRED FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT FEED THE KIDS INC: $5,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMountain Bike the Tetons Inc: $4,500 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetUNITED WAY OF EASTERN IDAHO: $4,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHERRYLAND HUMANE SOCIETY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEASTERN IDAHO COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMT HOLIDAY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget22 2 NONE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPACE North: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMYLOIDOSIS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGIFT OF LIFE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY - GRAND TRAVERSE REGION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARAKLESIS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE ROCK OF KINGSLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds Newtons Road Northwest ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds TRAVERSE HEALTH CLINIC AND COALITION ↗
  • Who funds MUNSON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONS ↗
  • Who funds TETON VALLEY TRAILS & PATHWAYS INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds FATHER FRED FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT FEED THE KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds Mountain Bike the Tetons Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF EASTERN IDAHO ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds CHERRYLAND HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds EASTERN IDAHO COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds MT HOLIDAY INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds 22 2 NONE ↗
  • Who funds PACE North ↗
  • Who funds THE CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE AMYLOIDOSIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GIFT OF LIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY - GRAND TRAVERSE REGION ↗
  • Who funds PARAKLESIS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Grand Traverse Regional Community FoundationMI28.3× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Grand Traverse Regional Community Foundation · Oleson Foundation · The Art and Mary Schmuckal Family Foundation · Rotary Charities of Traverse City · The Julius H and Barbara B Beers Family Foundation · The Broad Family Foundation · United Way of Northwest Michigan · Aline Underhill Orten Foundation Inc · Michigan Health Endowment Fund · DTE Energy Foundation · Consumers Energy Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization James a Childs and Susan M Childs Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from James a Childs and Susan M Childs Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on James a Childs and Susan M Childs’ filings →

    More from the funding graph