Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jacques Weber Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$102k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$378kEnvironment$51kHealth$40kArts & Culture$18kFood & Nutrition$17kPublic Safety & Disaster$16kHuman Services$13kEmployment$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $55k
$3,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BLOOMSBURG UNIVERSITY$45,000
GREG MOYER DEFIBRILLATOR FUND$10,400
THE READING LEAGUE$5,200
SAVE THE CHILDREN$5,200
Individual grant recipient$5,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$4,400
DENISON UNIVERSITY$4,000
SWEET P BAKERY$3,500
COLUMBIA COUNTY CONSERVATION DISTRICT$3,000
THE PROSPECTOR THEATER$3,000
BLOOMSBURG PUBLIC LIBRARY$2,400
Individual grant recipient$2,000
GUILFORD COLLEGE$2,000
LOAVES AND FISHES$2,000
PENNENVIRONMENT$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–23, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%OSSINING CHILDREN'S CENTER: $7k → 9%OSSINING CHILDREN'S CENTER: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
NY
MA
IA
OH
PA
CT
CA
VA
NC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 22% of Jacques Weber Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 60% of the giving stays in PA; by stated purpose, 39%.

Jacques Weber Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$497k · 20 repeat orgs$62k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
12

Total granted

$497k
$49k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+17%

Still filing today

60%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesEnvironmentFood & NutritionEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NORTH CAROLINA TEXTILE FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $85k · revenue +33%
  • DU
    DENISON UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $19k · revenue +20%
  • T5
    The 5 Gyres Institute
    5× · 2020–2024 · $19k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • GC
    GETTYSBURG COLLEGE
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +19%
  • WC
    WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • Williams College
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -5%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
2
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
3
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
4
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
5
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
6
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
7
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
8
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
9
Sarah Lawrence College

At sarah lawrence college, our mission is to graduate citizens of the world who are diverse in every definition of the word, who take intellectual and creative risks, and who are able to focus exceptional intellectual discipline (continued…

Education
10
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
11
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
12
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Gettysburg College; the most unlike its peers is Historic Orangeville Train Station Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
15/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BLOOMSBURG UNIVERSITY: $190,439 · OtherBLOOMSBURG UNIVERSITYGREG MOYER DEFIBRILLATOR FUND: $39,800 · OtherGREG MOYER DEFIBRILLATOR FUNDCOLUMBIA COUNTY CONSERVATION DISTRICT: $19,500 · OtherCOLUMBIA COUNTY CONSERVATION DISTRICTThe 5 Gyres Institute: $19,000 · OtherThe 5 Gyres Institute+18 more: $83,400 · Other+18 moreNORTH CAROLINA TEXTILE FOUNDATION INC: $85,000 · EducationNORTH CAROLINA TEXTILE FOUNDATI…DENISON UNIVERSITY: $19,000 · EducationDENISON UNIVERSITYTHE READING LEAGUE INC: $17,600 · EducationTHE READING LEAGUE INCGUILFORD COLLEGE: $12,000 · EducationGUILFORD COLLEGE+4 more: $20,000 · Education+4 moreAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $16,300 · Human ServicesOSSINING CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $8,000 · Human ServicesBLOOMSBURG PUBLIC LIBRARY: $8,800 · Arts & CultureHistoric Orangeville Train Station Association: $1,000 · Arts & CultureA&B IT'S ALL GOOD INC DBA SWEET P BAKERY: $7,900 · EmploymentTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION: $6,000 · EnvironmentSave The Children Federation Inc: $5,200 · International
Other$352,139Education$153,600Human Services$24,300Arts & Culture$9,800Employment$7,900Environment$6,000International$5,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTH CAROLINA TEXTILE FOUNDATION INC: $85,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetDENISON UNIVERSITY: $19,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe 5 Gyres Institute: $19,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetTHE READING LEAGUE INC: $17,600 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $16,300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGUILFORD COLLEGE: $12,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOMSBURG PUBLIC LIBRARY: $8,800 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetOSSINING CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetA&B IT'S ALL GOOD INC DBA SWEET P BAKERY: $7,900 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetPENNENVIRONMENT INC: $6,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGETTYSBURG COLLEGE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWilliams College: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetELIZABETHTOWN COLLEGE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOMES WITH HOPE: $3,400 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHistoric Orangeville Train Station Association: $1,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY GIVING FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA TEXTILE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DENISON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds The 5 Gyres Institute ↗
  • Who funds THE READING LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds GUILFORD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds BLOOMSBURG PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds OSSINING CHILDREN'S CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds A&B IT'S ALL GOOD INC DBA SWEET P BAKERY ↗
  • Who funds PENNENVIRONMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds GETTYSBURG COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Williams College ↗
  • Who funds SUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ELIZABETHTOWN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds HOMES WITH HOPE ↗
  • Who funds BLOOMSBURG FOOD CUPBOARD ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds Historic Orangeville Train Station Association ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY GIVING FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN7.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jacques Weber Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jacques Weber Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 28%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Homes With Hope: 28% of income from government
  • Williams College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Jacques Weber Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Jacques Weber Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jacques Weber’s filings →

More from the funding graph