Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jacob Beidler & Deborah Witzburg Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$77k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$143kYouth Development$123kArts & Culture$40kHealth$26kFood & Nutrition$8kPublic Benefit$5kCivil Rights$4kHuman Services$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
$1,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHICAGO YOUTH CENTERS$25,000
NEAR NORTH MONTESSORI SCHOOL$20,000
CHICAGO CHILDRENS MUSEUM$14,870
NMDP FOUNDATION$2,500
SHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY$2,500
BROWN UNIVERSITY ANNUAL FUND$2,000
CHICAGO POLICE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$1,000
CHICAGO PUBLIC SCHOOLS-J BEIDLER ELEMENTARY$1,000
3 ARTS$1,000
ERIE ELEMENTARY CHARTER SCHOOL$1,000
NATICK COMMUNITY ORGANIC FARM$1,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$1,000
CARA COLLECTIVE$1,000
GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY$1,000
WBEZ CHICAGO PUBLIC MEDIA$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NATICK COMMUNITY ORGANIC FARM: $1k → 8%BOSTON UNIVERSITY-WITZBURG SCHOLARSHIP: $5k → 16%ISLITA ENGLISH-FOUNDATION FOR THE AID OF YOUTH IN COSTA RICA: $1k → 8%VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER: $3k → 14%BE THE MATCH: $3k → 16%BROWN UNIVERSITY ANNUAL FUND: $2k → 14%KIDS FIRST CHICAGO: $5k → 14%NATICK COMMUNITY ORGANIC FARM: $1k → 8%VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER: $3k → 14%BE THE MATCH: $3k → 16%BROWN UNIVERSITY ANNUAL FUND: $2k → 14%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $1k → 14%NATICK COMMUNITY ORGANIC FARM: $1k → 8%BE THE MATCH: $2k → 16%BROWN UNIVERSITY ANNUAL FUND: $2k → 14%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $1k → 14%NATICK COMMUNITY ORGANIC FARM: $1k → 8%ACLU FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%BE THE MATCH: $1k → 16%BROWN UNIVERSITY ANNUAL FUND: $2k → 14%NATURE CONSERVANCY IN ILLINOIS: $1k → 14%ACLU FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%BE THE MATCH: $1k → 16%CHICAGO CHILDRENS MUSEUM: $15k → 14%CHICAGO CHILDRENS MUSEUM: $9k → 14%WBEZ CHICAGO PUBLIC MEDIA: $3k → 14%METROSQUASH: $9k → 14%METROSQUASH: $8k → 14%METROSQUASH: $6k → 14%METROSQUASH: $5k → 14%METROSQUASH: $5k → 14%METROSQUASH: $3k → 14%NEAR NORTH MONTESSORI SCHOOL: $20k → 14%NEAR NORTH MONTESSORI SCHOOL: $20k → 14%NEAR NORTH MONTESSORI SCHOOL: $15k → 14%NEAR NORTH MONTESSORI SCHOOL: $12k → 14%NEAR NORTH MONTESSORI SCHOOL: $9k → 14%NEAR NORTH MONTESSORI SCHOOL: $5k → 14%NEAR NORTH MONTESSORI SCHOOL: $3k → 14%NEAR NORTH MONTESSORI SCHOOL: $3k → 14%CHICAGO YOUTH CENTERS: $28k → 14%CHICAGO YOUTH CENTERS: $25k → 14%CHICAGO YOUTH CENTERS: $25k → 14%CHICAGO YOUTH CENTERS: $16k → 14%CHICAGO YOUTH CENTERS: $10k → 14%CHICAGO YOUTH CENTERS: $7k → 14%CHICAGO YOUTH CENTERS: $5k → 14%CHICAGO YOUTH CENTERS: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
RI
CA
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$335k · 21 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
13

Total granted

$335k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
0%

Still filing today

71%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationRecreation & SportsCivil RightsCrime & LegalFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CY
    Chicago Youth Centers
    8× · 2018–2025 · $116k · revenue +46%
  • NN
    NEAR NORTH MONTESSORI SCHOOL
    8× · 2018–2025 · $87k · revenue +8%
  • NF
    NMDP FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $14k · revenue +92%

Funded once

  • BU
    BOSTON UNIVERSITY-WITZBURG SCHOLARSHIP
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • NC
    NATURE CONSERVANCY IN ILLINOIS
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
  • EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue -36%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The University of Chicago Charter School Corporation

To Prepare Students for Success in Four-Year Colleges.

Education
2
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
3
The Chicago School of Professional Psychology

The Chicago School educates the next generation of change-makers in innovative theory and culturally competent practice to strengthen the integrated health of individuals, organizations, and communities.

Education
4
The Chicago Bar Foundation

The chicago bar foundation brings the legal community together through advocacy, funding, and innovation to improve access to justice for people in need and to make the legal system more fair, equitable, and effective.

Education
5
Chicago Maritime Museum

Operation of a nautical history museum.

—
6
Chicago Sun-Times Media Inc

Chicago sun-times serves the public interest by strengthening the well-being of our local communities and our democracy through independent local journalism.

—
7
Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education
8
Chicago Psychoanalytic Institute

The chicago psychoanalytic institute transforms the lives of individuals, families and communities, using psychoanalytic knowledge to help them grow and thrive.

Social Science
9
Kipp Chicago Schools

The team at kipp chicago schools is guided by a simple, yet powerful mission: to create a network of excellent schools in chicago that teach our students the character and academic skills necessary to succeed in college and beyond, and to…

Education
10
Illinois College

Illinois college is a co-educational institution of higher education learning providing a four-year educational program leading to the baccalaureate degree. illinois college is a community committed to the highest standards of scholarship…

Education
11
Chicago Theatre Group Inc

The chicago theatre group is committed to producing both classic and contemporary works giving full voice to a wide range of artists and visions. by dedicating itself to three guiding principles - quality, equity, and community - the…

Arts & Culture
12
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kids First Chicago for Education; the most unlike its peers is Humble Design Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
15/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Chicago Youth Centers: $116,050 · Youth DevelopmentChicago Youth CentersNEAR NORTH MONTESSORI SCHOOL: $86,569 · EducationNEAR NORTH MONTESSORI SCHOOLKIDS FIRST CHICAGO FOR EDUCATION: $6,000 · EducationKIDS FIRST CHICAGO FOR EDUCAT…+1 more: $1,000 · EducationChicago Children's Museum: $28,045 · Arts & CultureChicago Chi…CHICAGO PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $8,500 · Arts & CultureCHICAGO PUB…+2 more: $2,000 · Arts & CultureMETROSQUASH NFP: $34,500 · Recreation & SportsMETROSQUASH…Northwestern University: $2,000 · Recreation & SportsNorthwester…+1 more: $500 · Recreation & SportsPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $8,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHO…BOSTON UNIVERSITY-WITZBURG SCHOLARSHIP: $5,000 · OtherBOSTON UNIVERSIT…MOTHER 2 MOTHERS: $3,500 · OtherMOTHER 2 MOTHERSCHICAGO PUBLIC SCHOOLS-J BEIDLER ELEMENTARY: $3,000 · OtherCHICAGO PUBLIC S…Individual grant recipient: $2,000 · OtherTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER: $5,000 · OtherTHE VOTER PARTIC…AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · OtherAMERICAN CIVIL L…THE NATICK COMMUNITY ORGANIC FARM INC: $4,000 · OtherTHE NATICK COMMU…GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $3,500 · OtherGREATER CHICAGO …LAKE TANGANYIKA FLOATING HEALTH CLINIC: $3,000 · OtherLAKE TANGANYIKA …SHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY: $2,500 · OtherThe Cara Program: $2,000 · Other+14 more: $9,250 · Other+14 moreNMDP FOUNDATION: $14,000 · PhilanthropyBROWN UNIVERSITY: $12,500 · Community Improvement
Youth Development$116,050Education$93,569Arts & Culture$38,545Recreation & Sports$37,000Other$53,750Philanthropy$14,000Community Improvement$12,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetChicago Youth Centers: $116,050 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetNEAR NORTH MONTESSORI SCHOOL: $86,569 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMETROSQUASH NFP: $34,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetChicago Children's Museum: $28,045 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetNMDP FOUNDATION: $14,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $12,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $8,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS FIRST CHICAGO FOR EDUCATION: $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATICK COMMUNITY ORGANIC FARM INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $3,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE TANGANYIKA FLOATING HEALTH CLINIC: $3,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Cara Program: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumble Design Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetERIE ELEMENTARY CHARTER SCHOOL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOUSE THEATRE OF CHICAGO: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Chicago Youth Centers ↗
  • Who funds NEAR NORTH MONTESSORI SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds METROSQUASH NFP ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Children's Museum ↗
  • Who funds NMDP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO PUBLIC MEDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds KIDS FIRST CHICAGO FOR EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds THE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE NATICK COMMUNITY ORGANIC FARM INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds LAKE TANGANYIKA FLOATING HEALTH CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds The Cara Program ↗
  • Who funds EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Humble Design Inc ↗
  • Who funds ERIE ELEMENTARY CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO POLICE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds 3ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS PLAY SPORTS INC NFP ↗
  • Who funds MASSACHUSETTS APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE THEATRE OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arie and Ida Crown MemorialIL17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · The Chicago Community Trust · Francis Beidler III & Prudence R Beidler Foundation · Francis Beidler Foundation · Fifth Third Chicagoland Foundation · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · Circle of Service Foundation · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jacob Beidler & Deborah Witzburg Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jacob Beidler & Deborah Witzburg Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jacob Beidler & Deborah Witzburg’s filings →

    More from the funding graph