Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jacob & Charlotte Lehrman Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$740k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$350k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Philanthropy$2.8MArts & Culture$604kInternational$468kCivil Rights$380kHuman Services$305kReligion$225kEducation$208kHealth$180kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $130k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $250k
  • $250k+1 grant · $350k
$20,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER WASHINGTON$350,000
UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM$100,000
AMERICAN JEWISH JOINT DISTRIBUTION COMMITTEE INC$50,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM$50,000
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$50,000
AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE$25,000
SIXTH & I HISTORIC SYNAGOGUE$20,000
EDLAVITCH JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF WASHINGTON DC$20,000
WASHINGTON HEBREW CONGREGATION$15,000
THE JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY$15,000
AVODAH THE JEWISH SERVICES CORP$15,000
CHARLES E SMITH LIFE COMMUNITIES INC$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND HILLEL$10,000
WETA$5,000
JEWISH COUNCIL FOR THE AGING OF GREATER WASHINGTON$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $290k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 45% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 8%Miriam's Kitchen: $10k → 14%Fair Chance: $20k → 14%Reach Education Inc: $13k → 14%Jewish Social Service Agency: $15k → 8%Reach Education Inc: $13k → 14%Reach Inc: $13k → 14%Fair Chance: $10k → 14%Fair Chance: $10k → 14%Fair Chance: $10k → 14%Jewish Council for the Aging of Greater Washington: $5k → 8%Jewish Council for the Aging of Greater Washington: $5k → 8%Fair Chance: $10k → 14%Jewish Council for the Aging of Greater Washington: $5k → 8%Jewish Council for the Aging of Greater Washington: $5k → 8%JEWISH COUNCIL FOR THE AGING OF GREATER WASHINGTON: $5k → 8%Jewish Council for the Aging of Greater Washington: $5k → 8%Jewish Council for the Aging of Greater Washington: $5k → 8%Jewish Council for the Aging of Greater Washington: $5k → 8%Jewish Social Service Agency: $15k → 8%Jewish Social Service Agency: $15k → 8%Jewish Social Service Agency: $15k → 8%THE JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY: $15k → 8%Jewish Social Service Agency: $15k → 8%Jewish Social Service Agency: $15k → 8%Jewish Social Service Agency: $15k → 8%Reach Inc: $13k → 14%Fair Chance: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 42% of Jacob & Charlotte Lehrman Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 31% of the giving stays in DC; by stated purpose, 28%.

Jacob & Charlotte Lehrman Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 16% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.1M · 34 repeat orgs$220k to everyone else

34 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
13

Total granted

$3.1M
$170k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+48%

Still filing today

76%
69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesInternationalHealthFood & NutritionEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc
    8× · 2017–2025 · $360k · revenue +24%
  • TU
    The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
    2× · 2023–2025 · $200k · revenue +3%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    7× · 2018–2025 · $190k · revenue +206%

Funded once

  • AC
    American Committee for the Weizmann Inst of Scienc
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • AC
    American Committee for the Weizman Institute of Sc
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUEgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +80%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
2
Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Washington

As the central community relations agency of the organized jewish community in our nation's capital, the jcrc of greater washington endeavors to foster a society based on freedom, justice and democratic pluralism for it is such a society…

Community Improvement
3
Washington Monthly Institute

Dedicated to increasing public knowledge through washington monthly magazine and website www.washingtonmonthly.com published since 1969, the print magazine is the country's most important watchdog of american government, focusing on what's…

Social Science
4
Ingenuity Prep

Ingenuity prep public charter school was formed to prepare students to succeed in college and beyond as impactful civiic leaders.

Education
5
Dc Bilingual Public Charter School

The mission of dc bilingual public charter school is to create a learning community that ensures high academic achievement for all students in both spanish and english, develops leadership, and values all cultures.

Education
6
Freshfarm Markets

Freshfarm is a washington, dc-based nonprofit that builds a more equitable, sustainable, and resilient food system in the mid-atlantic region by producing innovative solutions in partnership with local communities and organizations. we…

Food & Nutrition
7
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
8
Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments

Create a more accessible, sustainable, prosperous and livable national capital region by being a discussion forum, expert resource, issue advocate, and catalyst for action.

Public Benefit
9
Hillel At the George Washington University Inc

The mission of gw hillel is to provide an open, warm, and pluralistic environment in which students can shape their college experience by connecting socially, culturally, and spiritually to their judaism. hillel aims to foster students'…

—
10
Jews United for Justice Inc

Jews united for justice advances economic, racial, and social justice in the baltimore-washington region by educating and mobilizing our local jewish communities to action.

Religion
11
Bender Jcc of Greater Washington

The bender jcc embraces and welcomes the diversity of our community and encourages everyone to seek meaning and fulfillment by participating in our rich programming inspired by our jewish heritage. we open our doors to everyone, including…

Human Services
12
The Jewish Community Center in Manhattan Inc

Together with our community, jcc manhattan creates opportunities for people to connect, grow, and learn within an ever-changing jewish landscape.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Martha's Table Inc; the most unlike its peers is Auschwitz Institute for the Prevention of Genocide and Mass Atrocities. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/36
Grantees still filing
30/36
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $3,125,000 · PhilanthropyTHE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER WASHINGTON INCAnti Defamation League: $335,000 · OtherAnti Defamation LeagueWASHINGTON HEBREW CONGREGATION: $120,000 · OtherWASHINGTON HEBREW CONGREGA…EDLAVITCH JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF WASHINGTON DC INC: $115,000 · OtherEDLAVITCH JEWISH COMMUNITY…THE STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC: $87,500 · OtherTHE STUDENT CONSERVATION A…American Committee for the Weizmann Institute: $75,000 · OtherSibley Memorial Hospital: $75,000 · OtherChildren's National Medical Center: $60,000 · OtherSynogogue at 6th and I: $60,000 · OtherSIXTH & I SYNAGOGUE INC: $140,000 · OtherSIXTH & I SYNAGOGUE INCAVODAH THE JEWISH SERVICE CORPS INC: $60,000 · Other+22 more: $400,000 · Other+22 moreLillian and Albert Small Capital Jewish Museum: $250,000 · Arts & CultureLillian an…The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $200,000 · Arts & CultureThe United…THE SHAKESPEARE THEATRE: $95,000 · Arts & CultureTHE SHAKES…THE PHILLIPS COLLECTION: $35,000 · Arts & CultureTHE PHILLI…GREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC: $22,500 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $16,500 · Arts & CultureThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $360,000 · InternationalThe Americ…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $190,000 · InternationalAMERICAN F…+1 more: $17,500 · InternationalJEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY: $120,000 · Human ServicesFAIR CHANCE: $70,000 · Human ServicesREACH EDUCATION INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH COUNCIL FOR THE AGING OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesMIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE LITERACY LAB: $157,500 · EducationHEBREW HOME OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $80,000 · HealthFOOD & FRIENDS INC: $35,000 · HealthSIBLEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Health
Philanthropy$3,125,000Other$1,527,500Arts & Culture$619,000International$567,500Human Services$290,000Education$157,500Health$145,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $3,125,000 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $360,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLillian and Albert Small Capital Jewish Museum: $250,000 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $200,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $190,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LITERACY LAB: $157,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetSIXTH & I SYNAGOGUE INC: $140,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetJEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY: $120,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetEDLAVITCH JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF WASHINGTON DC INC: $115,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SHAKESPEARE THEATRE: $95,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC: $87,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHEBREW HOME OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $80,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFAIR CHANCE: $70,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetAVODAH THE JEWISH SERVICE CORPS INC: $60,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetREACH EDUCATION INC: $50,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetJEWISH COUNCIL FOR THE AGING OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $40,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetWASHINGTON INNER CITY LACROSSE FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetFOOD & FRIENDS INC: $35,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PHILLIPS COLLECTION: $35,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSIBLEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLATIN AMERICAN YOUTH CENTER: $27,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC: $22,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNature Forward: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDC SCORES: $17,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetAUSCHWITZ INSTITUTE FOR THE PREVENTION OF GENOCIDE AND MASS ATROCITIES: $17,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetThe Studio Theatre Inc: $16,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMary's Center for Maternal and Child Care Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARTHA'S TABLE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY OF HOPE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAD FOR THE CITY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATUREBRIDGE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARY HOUSE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC ↗
  • Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc ↗
  • Who funds Lillian and Albert Small Capital Jewish Museum ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds THE LITERACY LAB ↗
  • Who funds SIXTH & I SYNAGOGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY ↗
  • Who funds EDLAVITCH JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF WASHINGTON DC INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SHAKESPEARE THEATRE ↗
  • Who funds THE STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HEBREW HOME OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC ↗
  • Who funds FAIR CHANCE ↗
  • Who funds AVODAH THE JEWISH SERVICE CORPS INC ↗
  • Who funds REACH EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COUNCIL FOR THE AGING OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON INNER CITY LACROSSE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOOD & FRIENDS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PHILLIPS COLLECTION ↗
  • Who funds SIBLEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LATIN AMERICAN YOUTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds GREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Nature Forward ↗
  • Who funds DC SCORES ↗
  • Who funds AUSCHWITZ INSTITUTE FOR THE PREVENTION OF GENOCIDE AND MASS ATROCITIES ↗
  • Who funds The Studio Theatre Inc ↗
  • Who funds Mary's Center for Maternal and Child Care Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz FoundationDC26× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Greater Washington Community Foundation · The Morningstar Philanthropic Foundation D/B/A the Morningstar Foundation · George Wasserman Family Foundation Inc · England Family Foundation · John Edward Fowler Memorial Foundation · Posner-Wallace Foundation · Clark-Winchcole Foundation · The Nussdorf Family Foundation Inc · Dockser Family Foundation Inc · The Ejl98 Charitable Trust · Dweck Philanthropies Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jacob & Charlotte Lehrman Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jacob & Charlotte Lehrman Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Nature Forward: 32% of income from government
  • Jewish Social Service Agency: 1% of income from government
  • Hebrew Home of Greater Washington Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Jacob & Charlotte Lehrman Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Jacob & Charlotte Lehrman Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jacob & Charlotte Lehrman’s filings →

More from the funding graph