Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jack M Klues & Elizabeth F Klues Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$226k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$927kEducation$820kHousing & Shelter$110kFood & Nutrition$85kHealth$44kHuman Services$20kPublic Safety & Disaster$15kReligion$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $124k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$40,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$332k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAINT VIATOR HIGH SCHOOL$50,000
OFF THE STREET CLUB$50,000
OFF THE STREET CLUB$44,250
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUNDATION$40,000
WEST BAY COMMUNITY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC$20,000
FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN$10,000
OFF THE STREET CLUB$10,000
MARCH OF DIMES FOUNDATION$1,250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WEST BAY COMMUNITY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $20k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 12% of Jack M Klues & Elizabeth F Klues Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Jack M Klues & Elizabeth F Klues Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 9 repeat orgs$133k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
4

Total granted

$1.9M
$113k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+2%

Still filing today

78%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthYouth DevelopmentInternationalArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OT
    OFF THE STREET CLUB
    9× · 2017–2025 · $927k · revenue +161%
  • University of Illinois Foundation
    8× · 2017–2025 · $323k · revenue +127%
  • FM
    FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $85k · revenue +83%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION OF GREEK HOUSING
    one grant, 2020 · $110k · revenue -6%
  • MI
    MUSIC INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +10%
  • ND
    NBIA Disorders Association
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Society for Neuroscience

Sfn's mission is to: 1. advance the understanding of the brain and the nervous system by bringing together scientists of all segments of neuroscience, by facilitating the integration of research directed at all levels of biological…

Health
2
Miami University Foundation

Support of miami university

Education
3
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
National Merit Scholarship Corporation

The mission of National Merit Scholarship Corporation (NMSC) is to recognize and honor the academically talented students of the United States. NMSC accomplishes its mission by conducting nationwide academic scholarship programs. The…

Education
6
St Francis College

St. francis college is an independent, coeducational institution of higher education chartered by an act of the regents of the university of the state of new york on april 10, 1957.

Education
7
Lycee Francais de Chicago Inc

The Lycee Francais de Chicago, driven by our core values of respect, responsibility and the joy of learning, empowers students to grow into active global citizens.

Education
8
Sarnoff Cardiovascular Research Foundation Inc

The sarnoff cardiovascular research foundation is dedicated to cultivating the next generation of physician-leaders in cardiovascular medicine by funding and supporting medical students and physicians engaged in transformative research.

Health
9
Ecole Francaise Internationale De Philadelphie

The ecole francaise internationale de philadelphie, also known as efip or french international school of philadelphia, is an independent school serving a multicultural community and offering a dual curriculum in french and in english,…

Education
10
Chicago Free School

Chicago Free School provides pre-kindergarten through 8th grade instruction and support activities. The faculty consists of qualified indiviuals with the appropriate education and experiende to provide students with the education that…

Education
11
The San Francisco School

A private school that cultivates and celebrates the intellectual, imaginative, and humanitarian promise of each student in a community that practices mutual respect, embraces diversity, and inspires passion for learning.

—
12
San Francisco Friends School

At san francisco friends school, students learn in a community grounded in the quaker values of reflection, integrity, peaceful problem-solving and stewardship. our teachers challenge students with a dynamic curriculum that inspires…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed My Starving Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OFF THE STREET CLUB: $926,910 · Youth DevelopmentOFF THE STREET CLUBUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $322,500 · EducationUniversity of Illinois Founda…QUINCY NOTRE DAME FOUNDATION: $200,000 · EducationQUINCY NOTRE DAME FOUNDATION+1 more: $6,869 · EducationSAINT VIATOR HIGH SCHOOL: $305,000 · OtherSAINT VIATOR HIGH SCHOO…THE SOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION OF GREEK HOUSING: $110,000 · OtherTHE SOCIETY FOR THE PRE…+2 more: $8,500 · OtherFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $85,000 · InternationalMARCH OF DIMES INC: $30,250 · HealthCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $12,500 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthWEST BAY COMMUNITY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Human ServicesMUSIC INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Youth Development$926,910Education$529,369Other$423,500International$85,000Health$43,750Human Services$20,000Arts & Culture$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOFF THE STREET CLUB: $926,910 over 9y, 7.5% of budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $322,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetQUINCY NOTRE DAME FOUNDATION: $200,000 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetTHE SOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION OF GREEK HOUSING: $110,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $85,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $30,250 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWEST BAY COMMUNITY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $12,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $6,869 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMUSIC INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNBIA Disorders Association: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFALKNER SWAMP NURSERY SCHOOL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA10.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jack M Klues & Elizabeth F Klues Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jack M Klues & Elizabeth F Klues Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jack M Klues & Elizabeth F Klues Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph