Skip to content
J-J Petricciani Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

J-J Petricciani Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$100k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$208kInternational$175kHealth$138kReligion$109kEmployment$75kPublic Safety & Disaster$65kYouth Development$45kFood & Nutrition$40kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $75k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT$25,000
JOB TRAIN$10,000
ST ANTHONY FOUNDATION$10,000
EL CAMINO HOSPITAL$10,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY$10,000
COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY$10,000
HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES$5,000
DOCTOR'S WITHOUT BORDERS$5,000
JESUIT RETREAT CENTER$5,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY$5,000
MEDICAL MISSION SISTERS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $143k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $15k → 8%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $10k → 8%COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $10k → 8%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $10k → 8%COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $10k → 8%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $10k → 8%COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $10k → 8%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $10k → 8%COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $8k → 8%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $10k → 8%COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $5k → 8%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $10k → 8%COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $5k → 8%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $10k → 8%COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $5k → 8%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$861k · 20 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +73% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
3

Total granted

$861k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+73%
+19%

Still filing today

50%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthInternationalHuman ServicesEmploymentYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $90k · revenue +233%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $75k · revenue +43%
  • JI
    JOBTRAIN INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $75k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • CC
    CANCER CAREPOINT INC
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +7%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $4k · revenue +99%
  • SMILE TRAIN INC
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +19%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
2
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
3
California Pacific Medical Center Foundation

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
4
John Muir Health

The mission of john muir is to improve the health of the communities we serve with quality and compassion.

Health
5
Sutter Valley Medical Foundation

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: Caring for our patients first and our people always. VISION: To be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
6
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
7
Stanford Health Care
Health
8
Ucsf Health Community Hospitals Fka Saint Francis Memorial Hospital

Ucsf health community hospital's mission statement is caring, healing, teaching, and discovering.

Health
9
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
10
Sutter Health

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
11
Sutter Valley Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
12
Sutter Coast Hospital

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lucile Packard Foundation for Children's Health; the most unlike its peers is Hopes Corner Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
13/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST ANTHONY FOUNDATION: $80,000 · OtherST ANTHONY FOUNDATIONEL CAMINO HOSPITAL: $75,000 · OtherEL CAMINO HOSPITALCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $65,000 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICESST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY: $55,000 · OtherST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETYMEDICAL MISSION SISTERS: $44,000 · OtherMEDICAL MISSION SISTERSJESUIT RETREAT CENTER: $28,500 · OtherJESUIT RETREAT CENTERSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $24,500 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANKHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $20,000 · OtherLUCILE PACKARD CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL STANFORD: $15,000 · Other+2 more: $12,500 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $75,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES…COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW LOS ALTOS AND LOS ALTOS HILLS INC: $67,500 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY SERVICES…HIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC: $90,000 · InternationalHIMALAYAN CATARA…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $41,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FR…JOBTRAIN INC: $74,500 · EmploymentJOBTRAIN …Vista Center for the Blind and Visually Impaired: $20,000 · HealthLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH: $10,000 · HealthSUTTER BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $6,000 · HealthCANCER CAREPOINT INC: $5,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $4,200 · HealthHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES: $45,000 · Youth DevelopmentHopes Corner Inc: $15,000 · Food & NutritionTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $7,500 · Education
Other$419,500Human Services$142,500International$131,000Employment$74,500Health$45,200Youth Development$45,000Food & Nutrition$15,000Education$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC: $90,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $75,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetJOBTRAIN INC: $74,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW LOS ALTOS AND LOS ALTOS HILLS INC: $67,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES: $45,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $41,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetVista Center for the Blind and Visually Impaired: $20,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetHopes Corner Inc: $15,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSUTTER BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER CAREPOINT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $4,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds JOBTRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW LOS ALTOS AND LOS ALTOS HILLS INC ↗
  • Who funds HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Vista Center for the Blind and Visually Impaired ↗
  • Who funds Hopes Corner Inc ↗
  • Who funds LUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SUTTER BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CANCER CAREPOINT INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

San Jose Mercury News…Los Altos Mountain Vi…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Silicon Valley Commun…The William & Flora H…The Sobrato Family Fo…Morgan Stanley Global…Tides FoundationAbbVie FoundationAmerican Endowment Fo…Vanguard Charitable E…Network for Good
San Jose Mercury News Wish Book Fund IncCA17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: San Jose Mercury News Wish Book Fund Inc · Los Altos Mountain View Community Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · The Sobrato Family Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Tides Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization J-J Petricciani Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from J-J Petricciani Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on J-J Petricciani’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home