Skip to content

· Private foundation

J D Degraw Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$22k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$63kHuman Services$33kAnimals$20kFood & Nutrition$9kPublic Safety & Disaster$9kPhilanthropy$6kYouth Development$6kArts & Culture$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$579k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE$11,689
ACTORS' THEATRE OF COLUMBUS$5,000
MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Ohio Living Foundation: $2k → 5%OPEN ARMS ADOPTIONS INC: $1k → 12%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $12k → 15%YWCA COLUMBUS: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

52%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$83k · 15 repeat orgs$78k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
11

Total granted

$83k
$61k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+44%

Still filing today

33%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 23% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    WOMEN'S CARE CENTER INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $11k · revenue +61%
  • PD
    PILOT DOGS ALLOWAY
    3× · 2017–2020 · $4k · revenue +322%
  • RU
    RECREATION UNLIMITED FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2020 · $4k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • YW
    YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +2%
  • OL
    OHIO LIVING WESTMINSTER-THURBER
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HUNGER ALLIANCEgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $9k · revenue +28%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Philanthropy Ohio

To lead and equip ohio philanthropy to be effective partners for change in our communities.

Philanthropy
2
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services
3
United Children's Services of Bennington County Inc

Children's services

Human Services
4
Ohio United Way

To strengthen the capacity of United Ways across Ohio and to advance the common good for Ohioans.

Philanthropy
5
Greater Cleveland Volunteers

Greater cleveland volunteers enriches the community and indivuduals through volunteer service. volunteers age 18 and older are recruited and placed in the agency's programs or referred to local nonprofit or public organizations to help…

Philanthropy
6
United Way of Central Ohio Inc

United way of central ohio is the local organization that harnesses the power of communities working together - people, nonprofits, businesses and government - to create a stronger, more equitable central ohio. see schedule o.we do this…

Philanthropy
7
Physicians Care Connection

Physicians careconnection (pcc) mission is to optimize health for individuals experiencing healthcare challenges due to personal and systemic barriers.

—
8
Greater Columbus Chamber of Commerce

Advancing a thriving central ohio commmunity by serving as a catalyst for all businesses to grow and flourish. our mission pillars are connections, government relations, strategic business solutions and talent/workforce.

—
9
Children's Hospital Medical Center of Akron

To improve the health of children, teenagers and young adults through excellence in patient care, education, research, advocacy and community partnerships.

Health
10
Ohio Hills Health Services

Ohio hills health services is a non-profit health care operation, organized by communities in eastern ohio to promote healthy lifestyles and to provide preventative and comprehensive medical and dental care for area residents. the primary…

—
11
Adult Congenital Heart Association

To empower the congenital heart disease (chd) community by advancing access to resources and specialized care that improve patient-centered outcomes.

Health
12
Empowering and Strengthening Ohio's People Inc

Empowering and strengthening ohio's people (esop) helps adults in all stages of life achieve and maintain financial wellness and housing stability.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The National Children's Cancer Society; the most unlike its peers is Muscular Dystrophy Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL SOCIETY TO PREVENT: $10,001 · OtherNATIONAL SOCIETY TO PREVENTTHE NATIONAL CHILDREN'S CANCER SOCIETY: $10,000 · OtherTHE NATIONAL CHILDREN'S CANCER SOCIETYOHIO LIVING WESTMINSTER-THURBER: $10,000 · OtherOHIO LIVING WESTMINSTER-THURBERAMERICAN RED CROSS OF GREATER: $8,813 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS OF GREATERACTORS THEATRE OF COLUMBUS: $5,000 · OtherACTORS THEATRE OF COLUMBUSIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOUNDTION: $4,071 · OtherCHILDHOOD LEAGUE CENTER: $4,071 · OtherHEINZERLING MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $4,071 · OtherEASTER SEAL REHABILITATION CTR: $4,071 · OtherPILOT DOGS ALLOWAY: $4,070 · OtherLIBERTY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $4,070 · OtherNATL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY MID-OHIO: $4,070 · OtherSALVATION ARMY: $3,479 · OtherST VINCENT CHILDREN'S CENTER: $3,479 · OtherLEUKEMIA SOCIETY: $3,479 · Other+2 more: $1,948 · OtherWOMEN'S CARE CENTER INC: $10,560 · HealthWOMEN'S CARE CENTER…MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $9,070 · HealthMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY …PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO: $7,271 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD …CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $11,689 · Human ServicesCANINE COMPANIONS…YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMEN'S CHR…OHIO LIVING FOUNDATION: $2,122 · Human ServicesOHIO LIVING FOUND…OPEN ARMS ADOPTIONS INC: $1,030 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S HUNGER ALLIANCE: $8,908 · Food & NutritionGIRL SCOUTS OF OHIO'S HEARTLAND COUNCIL INC: $6,000 · Youth DevelopmentRECREATION UNLIMITED FOUNDATION: $4,070 · Recreation & Sports
Other$89,693Health$26,901Human Services$24,841Food & Nutrition$8,908Youth Development$6,000Recreation & Sports$4,070

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $11,689 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S CARE CENTER INC: $10,560 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATIONAL CHILDREN'S CANCER SOCIETY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $9,070 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HUNGER ALLIANCE: $8,908 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO: $7,271 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF OHIO'S HEARTLAND COUNCIL INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetACTORS THEATRE OF COLUMBUS: $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetPILOT DOGS ALLOWAY: $4,070 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRECREATION UNLIMITED FOUNDATION: $4,070 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetOHIO LIVING FOUNDATION: $2,122 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPEN ARMS ADOPTIONS INC: $1,030 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S CARE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds THE NATIONAL CHILDREN'S CANCER SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HUNGER ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF OHIO'S HEARTLAND COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds ACTORS THEATRE OF COLUMBUS ↗
  • Who funds PILOT DOGS ALLOWAY ↗
  • Who funds RECREATION UNLIMITED FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OHIO LIVING FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OPEN ARMS ADOPTIONS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Columbus FoundationOH18.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Columbus Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization J D Degraw Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from J D Degraw Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on J D Degraw’s filings →

    More from the funding graph