Skip to content
Israel on Campus Coalition Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Israel on Campus Coalition Inc

To inspire american college campus communities, students, thought-leaders, and other communities grappling with antisemitism to see israel as a source of pride and to empower them to stand up for israel both off and on campus; the corporation will accomplish its work both off and on campuses across the united states, and will advance…

$655k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$43k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$1.2MReligion$711kEducation$626kCivil Rights$271kCrime & Legal$152kInternational$73kArts & Culture$14kHuman Services$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 24 grants below total $282,920, the rows itemized in this filing. The $655,258 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $372,338 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $92k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $191k
$8,500
Median grant
11
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE$42,506
THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$28,000
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA$25,000
NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$25,000
HILLEL AT BARUCH COLLEGE$15,300
HILLEL FOUNDATION OF CAMBRIDGE INC$12,900
GRATZ COLLEGE$12,500
CHABAD OF THE NORTH SHORE$10,000
CHABAD ON CAMPUS INTERNATIONAL$10,000
TAMID NATIONAL$10,000
TRAUMA INFORMED LOS ANGELES$9,000
FEATURE GROUP INC$8,500
RELIGION MEDIA FOUNDATION$8,000
HILLEL AT STONY BROOK$6,550
ACADEMIC STUDIES PRESS INC$6,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%M54: $12k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
MO
VA
MD
TN
NC
SC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 26% of Israel on Campus Coalition Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 6% of the giving stays in DC; by stated purpose, 2%.

Israel on Campus Coalition Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 30% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 24 repeat orgs$835k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
40

Total granted

$2.1M
$745k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+23%

Still filing today

75%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $91k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionEducationCivil RightsPhilanthropyInternationalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TI
    TAMID ISRAEL INVESTMENT GROUP LTD
    2× · 2018–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +13%
  • TL
    The Louis D Brandeis Center Inc
    2× · 2021–2022 · $152k · revenue +900%
  • HA
    HILLEL AT BARUCH INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $108k · revenue +55%

Funded once

  • NC
    NETWORK CONTAGION RESEARCH INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2022 · $335k · revenue +23%
  • IE
    ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue +17%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
    one grant, 2022 · $28k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American University Hillel Inc

To enrich the lives of Jewish students so that they may enrich the Jewish people and the world.

—
2
Hillel the Foundation for Jewish Campus Life

Hillel of Colorado seeks to engage, empower, and work with Jewish college students to create Jewish communities at University of Denver, Colorado State University, Auraria Campus, Colorado School of Mines and other front range…

—
3
Hillel Foundation At the University of Rhode Island

The mission of uri hillel is to enrich the lives of jewish students at the university of rhode island so that they may enrich the jewish people and the world.

—
4
Hillel Foundation at Miami University

Hillel at Miami University, the center of Jewish life on campus, seeks to engage, connect, and empower students to explore their Jewish identity creating a vibrant Jewish community and inspiring the next generation of Jewish leaders.

—
5
Hillel At Washington University in St Louis

The mission of hillel at washington university in st louis is to be a catalyst for jewish life among college students in st louis. we connect students with one another and with jewish culture and traditions through service and social…

—
6
The University of Iowa Louis Shulman Hillel Foundation

The mission of Iowa Hillel is to enhance the lives of Jewish students at the University of Iowa, so they may enrich the Jewish people and the world. Iowa Hillel envisions a world for our students where they find a community here at Iowa…

—
7
Hillel At Florida International University

Enrich the lives of jewish students

—
8
Hebrew College

Promotes excellence in jewish learning & leadership within a pluralistic environment. see sch ohebrew college promotes excellence in jewish learning and leadership within a pluralistic environment of open inquiry, intellectual rigor,…

Education
9
Hillel the Foundation for Jewish Campus Life

Enriching the lives of jewish students so that they may enrich the jewish people & the world hillel students leaders, professional & lay leaders are dedicated to creating a pluralistic, welcoming & inclusive environment for jewish college…

—
10
Hillel Foundation University of Wisconsin Inc

Hillel, the jewish student center at the university of wisconsin-madison, serves over 5,000 jewish students and faculty. hillel provides a home and support to various independent student organizations. every expression of jewish life is…

Religion
11
Hillel the Foundation for Jewish Campus Life

KU Hillel's mission is to connect Jewish students to each other and to their Judaism, to inspire and equip the next generation of Jewish leaders, and to build a thriving Jewish community on campus.

—
12
Hillel At the George Washington University Inc

The mission of gw hillel is to provide an open, warm, and pluralistic environment in which students can shape their college experience by connecting socially, culturally, and spiritually to their judaism. hillel aims to foster students'…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Southern California Hillel Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Trauma Informed La. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 78 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
46/46
Grantees still filing
32/46
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TAMID ISRAEL INVESTMENT GROUP LTD: $1,213,884 · Youth DevelopmentTAMID ISRAEL INVESTMENT GROUP LTDHILLEL AT BARUCH INC: $108,194 · OtherHILLEL AT BARUCH INCEVERGREEN STATE COLLEGE: $50,000 · OtherEVERGREEN STATE COLLEGENJ INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $50,000 · OtherNJ INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGYUSC School of Medicine Greenville: $50,000 · OtherUSC School of Medicine Greenvi…CHABAD OF CHAMPAIGN-URBANA NFP: $44,300 · OtherCHABAD OF CHAMPAIGN-URBANA NFPUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $28,000 · Other+47 more: $493,258 · Other+47 moreNETWORK CONTAGION RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $335,000 · EducationNETWORK CONTAGION RESEA…UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $75,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNI…Yale University: $62,000 · EducationYale UniversityThe George Washington University: $53,000 · EducationThe George Washington U…ALPHA EPSILON PI FOUNDATION: $43,000 · EducationALPHA EPSILON PI FOUNDA…President and Fellows of Harvard College: $42,506 · EducationPresident and Fellows o…+4 more: $39,300 · Education+4 moreCHABAD ON CAMPUS INTERNATIONAL INC: $51,800 · ReligionHILLEL FOUNDATION OF CAMBRIDGE INC: $34,900 · ReligionCOLUMBIABARNARD HILLEL INC: $22,491 · ReligionHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $20,000 · ReligionJewish Heritage Programs: $12,350 · ReligionCHABAD STUDENT CENTER AT UofM: $10,000 · ReligionCONGREGATION B'NAI B'RITH HILLEL: $9,902 · ReligionFRIENDS OF HILLEL AT STONY BROOK INC: $6,550 · ReligionThe Louis D Brandeis Center Inc: $151,650 · Crime & LegalTHE BNAI BRITH HILLEL FOUNDATION AT THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $23,277 · Civil RightsA WIDER BRIDGE: $10,000 · Civil RightsTrauma Informed La: $9,000 · Civil RightsISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $29,725 · InternationalSTUDENTS SUPPORTING ISRAEL: $7,700 · International
Youth Development$1,213,884Other$823,752Education$649,806Religion$167,993Crime & Legal$151,650Civil Rights$42,277International$37,425

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNETWORK CONTAGION RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $335,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetThe Louis D Brandeis Center Inc: $151,650 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetHILLEL AT BARUCH INC: $108,194 over 8y, 2.7% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYale University: $62,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe George Washington University: $53,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHABAD ON CAMPUS INTERNATIONAL INC: $51,800 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetALPHA EPSILON PI FOUNDATION: $43,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $42,506 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL FOUNDATION OF CAMBRIDGE INC: $34,900 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $29,725 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMINNESOTA HILLEL: $27,385 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetTHE BNAI BRITH HILLEL FOUNDATION AT THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $23,277 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCOLUMBIABARNARD HILLEL INC: $22,491 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBNAI BRITH HILLEL FOUNDATION AT BROOKLYN COLLEGE: $19,095 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetRutgers Hillel Corporation: $18,888 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHillel at Binghamton Inc: $17,871 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetHILLEL AT UCLA: $15,350 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College: $12,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Heritage Programs: $12,350 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetM54 INC: $12,000 over 1y, 28% of budgetGAINESVILLE JEWISH STUDENT FOUNDATION INC: $11,750 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCHABAD STUDENT CENTER AT UofM: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetA WIDER BRIDGE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHeart of A Nation: $10,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetREGENT UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONGREGATION B'NAI B'RITH HILLEL: $9,902 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSTUDENTS SUPPORTING ISRAEL: $7,700 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHASBARA FELLOWSHIPS INCORPORATED: $7,400 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetHILLEL AT VA TECH INC: $7,050 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNew York University: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF HILLEL AT STONY BROOK INC: $6,550 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTHE JEWISH MAJORITY: $6,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetBEN AND ESTHER ROSENBLOOM HILLEL CENTER FOR JEWISH LIFE AT UNIVERSITY OF MD: $5,814 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHILLEL OF BROWARD AND PALM BEACH INC: $5,775 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY HILLEL ADVISORY: $5,700 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetHILLEL OF SAN DIEGO: $5,550 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HILLEL FOUNDATION: $5,400 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS: $5,250 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Maccabee Task Force F…Chabad on Campus Inte…Hillel the Foundation…Jewish Communal FundJewish Community Foun…United Jewish Appeal-…Combined Jewish Phila…Seed the Dream Founda…Greater Miami Jewish …Birthright Israel Fou…Jewish National Fund …Jewish Federation of …
Maccabee Task Force FoundationNV42.9× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Maccabee Task Force Foundation · Chabad on Campus International Inc · Hillel the Foundation for Jewish Campus Life · Jewish Communal Fund · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Seed the Dream Foundation · Greater Miami Jewish Federation Inc · Birthright Israel Foundation · Jewish National Fund (Keren Kayemeth Leisrael) Inc · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Israel on Campus Coalition Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Israel on Campus Coalition Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
  • Yale University: 12% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 78 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Israel on Campus Coalition’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home