Skip to content

· Public charity

Island Institute

We boldly navigate climate and economic change with island and coastal communities to expand opportunities and deliver solutions.

$704k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$181k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$2.2MEnvironment$513kCommunity Improvement$348kYouth Development$289kPublic Benefit$156kArts & Culture$50kEducation$46kMembership Benefit$40kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 13 grants below total $442,040, the rows itemized in this filing. The $704,475 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $262,435 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k12 grants · $261k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $181k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$42M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Luke's Lobster Holding LLC$180,811
Eastport Energy Committee$43,729
Pendleton Yacht Yard$40,000
Town of Isle au Haut$37,500
Maine Ocean Farms LLC$30,000
Matinicus Isle Plantation$20,000
Town of Isle au Haut$15,000
Foundation for Strong Maine Economy$15,000
Town of Tremont$15,000
Hancock County Planning Commission$12,500
Midcoast Council of Governments$12,500
Peaks Environmental Action Team$10,000
Town of Islesboro$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%St George Community Development Corp: $8k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.2M · 21 repeat orgs$533k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +86% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
38

Total granted

$3.2M
$403k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+86%
+25%

Still filing today

14%
16%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $130k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentEducationAnimalsHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HC
    HANCOCK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $43k · revenue +86%
  • NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC
    3× · 2020–2023 · $23k · revenue +25%
  • MC
    MOMENTUM CONSERVATION
    2× · 2020–2021 · $20k · revenue +275%

Funded once

  • NL
    NATIONAL LEAD FOR AMERICA INC
    one grant, 2024 · $27k · revenue 0%
  • AE
    Axiom Education & Training Center
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • BI
    Biddeford Internet Corp
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wetlands Foundation
Environment
2
Protect Maine's Fishing Heritage Foundation
Environment
3
Maine Audubon Society

Maine Audubon works to conserve Maine's wildlife and habitat by engaging people of all ages in education, conservation, and action. We are helping the people of Maine become the nation's most informed and effective stewards of wildlife and…

Environment
4
The Quebec-Labrador Foundation Inc

The program mission of the quebec-labrador foundation u.s. is defined by a regional component (new england and eastern canada), and an international component, which ties our regional model to a global conservation network. qlf's program…

Philanthropy
5
Acadia Center

Acadia Center advances bold, effective, and equitable clean energy solutions for a livable climate and a stronger, more equitable economy.

Environment
6
Growsmart Maine

To build lasting prosperity without sacrificing the quality of life that defines maine.

Environment
7
Maine Center for Coastal Fisheries

Secure a sustainable future for fisheries and fishing communities in Eastern Maine and beyond.

Science & Tech
8
Androscoggin Valley Council of Governments

To strengten local government while combining total resources to meet regional challenges beyond individual capacities and to serve as a mutual forum to identify, study, and to bring into focus regional interest.

Public Benefit
9
ClimateWork Maine

ClimateWork Maine (CWM) is a private non-profit 501(c)(3) organization based in Maine that serves as a support network for businesses and business leaders that are taking action on climate change, to meet its challenges and to seize the…

Health
10
Conservation Law Foundation Inc

Conservation law foundation, inc. (clf) protects new england's environment for the benefit of all people and future generations. we use the law, science, and markets to create solutions that preserve and restore our natural resources,…

Environment
11
Sebasticook Regional Land Trust

The mission of the SRLT is to recognize and conserve the rich wild and workinglandscape of Central Maine's Sebasticook River watershed through conservation,stewardship and education. Our focal programs are land conservation for…

Environment
12
Manomet Inc

Manomet uses science and collaboration to improve the health of flyways, coastal ecosystems, and working lands and seas.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Foundation for a Strong Maine Economy; the most unlike its peers is National Audubon Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Luke's Lobster Holding LLC: $2,425,136 · OtherLuke's Lobster Holding LLC+54 more: $1,092,690 · Other+54 moreHANCOCK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION: $43,000 · EnvironmentNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $23,000 · EnvironmentMOMENTUM CONSERVATION: $20,000 · EnvironmentKENNEBEC ESTUARY LAND TRUST: $9,322 · EnvironmentNATIONAL LEAD FOR AMERICA INC: $26,667 · Public BenefitAXIOM EDUCATION & TRAINING CENTER: $15,000 · EducationCOALITION FOR THE COMMON GOOD: $10,000 · EducationFOUNDATION FOR A STRONG MAINE ECONOMY: $15,000 · Community ImprovementSTGEORGE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $8,000 · Human ServicesDOWNEAST SALMON FEDERATION: $6,000 · Animals
Other$3,517,826Environment$95,322Public Benefit$26,667Education$25,000Community Improvement$15,000Human Services$8,000Animals$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHANCOCK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION: $43,000 over 4y, 7.8% of budgetNATIONAL LEAD FOR AMERICA INC: $26,667 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $23,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMOMENTUM CONSERVATION: $20,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetAXIOM EDUCATION & TRAINING CENTER: $15,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCOALITION FOR THE COMMON GOOD: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKENNEBEC ESTUARY LAND TRUST: $9,322 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSTGEORGE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $8,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetDOWNEAST SALMON FEDERATION: $6,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HANCOCK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL LEAD FOR AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds MOMENTUM CONSERVATION ↗
  • Who funds AXIOM EDUCATION & TRAINING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR A STRONG MAINE ECONOMY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Maine Community Foundation IncME37× affinity20 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Maine Community Foundation Inc · Center for Technology and Civic Life · Maine Coast Heritage Trust · Elmina B Sewall Foundation · Davis Conservation Foundation · Onion Foundation · National Fish and Wildlife Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Island Institute funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Island Institute. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Island Institute’s filings →

    More from the funding graph