· Public charity
Isa Foundation
To create sustainable impact globally through volunteer efforts and charitable contributions focused on healthy nutrition and support for underserved children, wellness education for all, aid for those affected by natural disasters, and the pursuit of equality.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- $10k–50k6 grants · $136k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $250k
- $250k+1 grant · $598k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SERV | $598,036 |
| HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| EMBODY | $50,000 |
| ATTITUDE IS EVERYTHING FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| COMMON THREADS | $50,000 |
| DISASTER SERVICES CORPORATION - SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL USA | $50,000 |
| UNSTOPPABLE FOUNDATION | $46,052 |
| ONE FOR HEALTH | $35,000 |
| ESPERANCA | $20,000 |
| US TRACK & FIELD FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| PALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND (PCRF) | $10,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ODOM (AFMDA) | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $264k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
25 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2023, 17 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SISERV INTERNATIONAL INC4× · 2020–2023 · $1.2M · revenue +26% · 28% of their budget
- CTCOMMON THREADS3× · 2021–2023 · $190k · revenue +19%
Compassion International Incorporated3× · 2020–2022 · $175k · revenue +16%
Funded once
MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICAgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $150k · revenue +30%- GIGenYOUTH Incorporatedone grant, 2022 · $105k · revenue +14%
- GIGIRLTREK INCORPORATEDgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +261%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Food for the hungry is a christian humanitarian aid and global development organization that has designed, developed and delivered solutions for more than 50 years so that children, families and communities can flourish. (continued on…
United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.
For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…
On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.
Rise against hunger, inc. is an international hunger relief non-profit organization that is driven by a vision of a world without hunger and a mission to end hunger in our lifetime. rise against hunger distributes food and other…
Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.
Gardens for Health International works to provide lasting agricultural solutions to chronic childhood malnutrition
Pact is a nonprofit organization that builds evidence-based, data-driven, and community-led solutions for human development (continued in schedule o)
Waste Not cultivates sustainable food systems that help people and the planet flourish. We do this by eliminating food waste and hunger through innovative community partnerships.
At catalyst family, inc., we believe that strong families build strong communities. we are committed to nurturing vibrant communities where children thrive and families succeed, creating lasting change.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Advance Community and the most unlike its peers is Read Across Africa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 18 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
63 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 63 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SERV INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds UNSTOPPABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DISASTER SERVICES CORPORATION-SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL USA ↗
- Who funds COMMON THREADS ↗
- Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
- Who funds ONE FOR HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds Attitude Is Everything Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds GenYOUTH Incorporated ↗
- Who funds Partnership for a Healthier America Inc ↗
- Who funds GIRLTREK INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds AIRLINE AMBASSADORS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds URBAN IMPACT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LIVE LOVE ↗
- Who funds HEALING HAITI ↗
- Who funds IDEA Public Schools ↗
- Who funds HEADWATERS RELIEF ORGANIZATION INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds TEAM RUBICON INC ↗
- Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC ↗
- Who funds UN FUTURO MEJOR INC ↗
- Who funds SOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds ADVANCE COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds DELIA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOMELESS ENGAGEMENT AND LIFT PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds ADVANCEMENT FOR RURAL KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds CREIGHTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ICAN IMPROVING CHANDLER AREA NEIGHBORHOODS ↗
- Who funds Camp Stix Diabetes Programs ↗
- Who funds PROVIDING OPPORTUNITY FOR SELF IMPROVEMENT CABARETE DOM REPUBLIC ↗
- Who funds THE EMERIL LAGASSE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA INC ↗
- Who funds AZCEND ↗
- Who funds EMERALD COAST CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HOUSE OF REFUGE INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT 150 ↗
- Who funds MANY HANDS FOR HAITI ↗
- Who funds THE BE KIND PEOPLE PROJECT FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Thunderbirds Charities · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation · Fiesta Events Inc · Valley of the Sun United Way · Phoenix Suns Charities Inc · Dignity Health · American Express Foundation · Dignity Community Care · John F Long Foundation Inc · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Isa Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Isa Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Isa Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.