Skip to content

· Private foundation

Irving and Adele Rosenberg Foundati Attn Michael and Nancy Herman

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$54k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$272kEducation$150kHealth$77kArts & Culture$35kPhilanthropy$19kScience & Tech$3kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kCommunity Improvement$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $29k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHSHORE COUNTY DAY SCHOOL$17,000
CENTRAL SYNAGOGUE$12,200
TEMPLE SHOLOM CHICAGO$9,076
TEMPLE ISRAEL OF WESTPORT$6,344
EISENHOWER HEALTH$5,000
INLAND EMPIRE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$2,500
NORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$1,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF THE DESERT$360
CHICAGO PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 72% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%MC CALLUM THEATER FUND: $8k → 11%TEMPLE ISRAEL OF WESTPORT: $7k → 9%NORTHSHORE COUNTY DAY SCHOOL: $29k → 14%MC CALLUM THEATER FUND: $3k → 11%CENTRAL SYNAGOGUE: $22k → 17%TEMPLE ISRAEL OF WESTPORT: $6k → 9%NORTHSHORE COUNTY DAY SCHOOL: $17k → 14%INLAND EMPIRE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%CENTRAL SYNAGOGUE: $22k → 17%TEMPLE ISRAEL OF WESTPORT: $6k → 9%NORTHSHORE COUNTY DAY SCHOOL: $10k → 14%INLAND EMPIRE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%CENTRAL SYNAGOGUE: $21k → 17%GREEN FARMS ACADEMY: $5k → 9%NORTHSHORE COUNTY DAY SCHOOL: $7k → 14%INLAND EMPIRE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%CENTRAL SYNAGOGUE: $21k → 17%GREEN FARMS ACADEMY: $5k → 9%NORTHSHORE COUNTY DAY SCHOOL: $7k → 14%CENTRAL SYNAGOGUE: $21k → 17%NORTHSHORE COUNTY DAY SCHOOL: $5k → 14%CENTRAL SYNAGOGUE: $21k → 17%CATHERINE COOK SCHOOL: $6k → 14%CENTRAL SYNAGOGUE: $13k → 17%CATHERINE COOK SCHOOL: $6k → 14%CENTRAL SYNAGOGUE: $12k → 17%CATHERINE COOK SCHOOL: $6k → 14%CENTRAL SYNAGOGUE: $12k → 17%CATHERINE COOK SCHOOL: $6k → 14%CATHERINE COOK SCHOOL: $3k → 14%EISENHOWER MEDICAL CENTER: $53k → 11%CATHERINE COOK SCHOOL: $3k → 14%EISENHOWER HEALTH: $5k → 11%EISENHOWER HEALTH: $5k → 11%TEMPLE SHOLOM CHICAGO: $14k → 14%TEMPLE SHOLOM CHICAGO: $12k → 14%EISENHOWER HEALTH: $5k → 11%TEMPLE SHOLOM CHICAGO: $11k → 14%TEMPLE SHOLOM CHICAGO: $10k → 14%EISENHOWER MEDICAL CENTER: $3k → 11%TEMPLE SHOLOM CHICAGO: $10k → 14%TEMPLE SHOLOM CHICAGO: $10k → 14%EISENHOWER MEDICAL CENTER: $3k → 11%TEMPLE SHOLOM CHICAGO: $9k → 14%TEMPLE SHOLOM CHICAGO: $8k → 14%INLAND EMPIRE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $8k → 11%TEMPLE SHOLOM CHICAGO: $5k → 14%COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONPGA WEDUFUND: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of Irving and Adele Rosenberg Foundati Attn Michael and Nancy Herman’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Irving and Adele Rosenberg Foundati Attn Michael and Nancy Hermanlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$536k · 21 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
13

Total granted

$536k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+26%

Still filing today

62%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyCrime & LegalAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NS
    NORTH SHORE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL
    6× · 2020–2025 · $74k · revenue +3%
  • EM
    Eisenhower Medical Center
    6× · 2017–2025 · $73k · revenue +94%
  • DS
    DALTON SCHOOLS INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $34k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • IG
    IMPACT GRANTS CHICAGOgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +26%
  • PS
    PALM SPRINGS FRIENDS OF THE PHILHA
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Marc Lustgarten Pancreatic Cancer Foundation

The lustgarten foundation is the largest private funder of pancreatic cancer research in the world. see schedule o.the lustgarten foundation is boldly leading the way through hope and innovation, turning fear into action through education…

Human Services
2
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
3
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
4
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
5
The Jonsson Cancer Center Foundation

The jonsson cancer center foundation is the single most important vehicle for raising private funds for cancer research at ucla and plays a key role in advancing cancer treatments and care. please see schedule o for additional information.

—
6
University of California Irvine Foundation

The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…

Education
7
Animal Cancer Foundation

Animal cancer foundation is dedicated to finding new treatments and eventual cures for cancer by funding research in and increasing public awareness of comparative oncology, the study of naturally occurring, similar cancers in people and…

Health
8
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
9
Sarnoff Cardiovascular Research Foundation Inc

The sarnoff cardiovascular research foundation is dedicated to cultivating the next generation of physician-leaders in cardiovascular medicine by funding and supporting medical students and physicians engaged in transformative research.

Health
10
Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education
11
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
12
The V Foundation

We fund game-changing research and all-star scientists to accelerate victory over cancer and save lives.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Breast Cancer Research Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Paws & Hearts. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
16/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CENTRAL SYNAGOGUE: $163,500 · OtherCENTRAL SYNAGOGUETEMPLE SHOLOM OF CHICAGO: $88,683 · OtherTEMPLE SHOLOM OF CHICAGONORTH SHORE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $74,429 · OtherNORTH SHORE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOLTHE CATHERINE COOK SCHOOL: $30,000 · OtherTHE CATHERINE COOK SCHOOLTEMPLE ISRAEL WESTPORT INC: $19,592 · OtherMC CALLUM THEATER FUND: $16,447 · Other+18 more: $9,266 · OtherEisenhower Medical Center: $72,500 · HealthEisenhower Med…+2 more: $150 · HealthDALTON SCHOOLS INC: $34,286 · EducationGREENS FARMS ACADEMY INC: $10,000 · Education+1 more: $50 · EducationInland Empire Community Foundation: $18,000 · PhilanthropyPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $1,250 · PhilanthropyIMPACT GRANTS CHICAGO: $1,100 · PhilanthropyPALM SPRINGS FRIENDS OF PHILHARMONIC: $10,140 · Arts & CultureLITERARY SOCIETY OF THE DESERT: $7,470 · Arts & CulturePLAY FOR PINK INC: $1,640 · Crime & LegalTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $870 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$401,917Health$72,650Education$44,336Philanthropy$20,350Arts & Culture$17,610Crime & Legal$1,640Public Safety & Disaster$870

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTH SHORE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $74,429 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetEisenhower Medical Center: $72,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDALTON SCHOOLS INC: $34,286 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CATHERINE COOK SCHOOL: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetInland Empire Community Foundation: $18,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPALM SPRINGS FRIENDS OF PHILHARMONIC: $10,140 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetGREENS FARMS ACADEMY INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLITERARY SOCIETY OF THE DESERT: $7,470 over 7y, 94% of budgetHEMLOCK FARMS VOL FIRE & RESCUE COM: $1,750 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetPLAY FOR PINK INC: $1,640 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $1,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetIMPACT GRANTS CHICAGO: $1,100 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $870 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM SPRINGS AND DESERT AREA: $540 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MABEL MERCER FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS & HEARTS: $60 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLUNG CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTH SHORE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Eisenhower Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds DALTON SCHOOLS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CATHERINE COOK SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Inland Empire Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds PALM SPRINGS FRIENDS OF PHILHARMONIC ↗
  • Who funds GREENS FARMS ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds LITERARY SOCIETY OF THE DESERT ↗
  • Who funds HEMLOCK FARMS VOL FIRE & RESCUE COM ↗
  • Who funds PLAY FOR PINK INC ↗
  • Who funds PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds IMPACT GRANTS CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM SPRINGS AND DESERT AREA ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MABEL MERCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds PAWS & HEARTS ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LUNG CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Federation of Metropolitan ChicagoIL15.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Irving and Adele Rosenberg Foundati Attn Michael and Nancy Herman funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Irving and Adele Rosenberg Foundati Attn Michael and Nancy Herman. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Irving and Adele Rosenberg Foundati Attn Michael and Nancy Herman’s filings →

    More from the funding graph