Skip to content

California · Private foundation

Irving and Adele Rosenberg Foundati Attn Michael and Nancy Herman

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$54k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
9
Grants FY2025
9
Organizations funded FY2024
11%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$5,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$17,000
Organizations funded a year
9 to 15
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
4
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 11% of the organizations Irving and Adele Rosenberg Foundati Attn Michael and Nancy Herman funded were first-time grantees, receiving 1% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationPhilanthropyPublic Safety & DisasterInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving7$51k14%
FY20249$65k11%
FY20239$54k33%
FY202211$51k18%
FY202114$45k36%
FY202012$47k33%
FY201913$118k8%
FY201815$49k7%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$272kEducation$150kHealth$77kArts & Culture$35kPhilanthropy$19kScience & Tech$3kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kCommunity Improvement$1kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Central Synagogue$163,5009n/a
Temple Sholom of Chicago$88,6839n/a
North Shore Country Day School$74,42960%
Eisenhower Medical Center$72,50060%
Dalton Schools Inc$34,28640%
The Catherine Cook School$30,00060%
Temple Israel Westport Inc$19,5923n/a
Palm Springs Friends of Philharmonic$10,14050%
Greens Farms Academy Inc$10,00020%
Literary Society of the Desert$7,470794%
Show all 23 grantees
All grantees of Irving and Adele Rosenberg Foundati Attn Michael and Nancy Herman by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Central Synagogue$163,5009n/a
Temple Sholom of Chicago$88,6839n/a
North Shore Country Day School$74,42960%
Eisenhower Medical Center$72,50060%
Dalton Schools Inc$34,28640%
The Catherine Cook School$30,00060%
Temple Israel Westport Inc$19,5923n/a
Palm Springs Friends of Philharmonic$10,14050%
Greens Farms Academy Inc$10,00020%
Literary Society of the Desert$7,470794%
Hemlock Farms Vol Fire & Rescue Com$1,75050%
Play for Pink Inc$1,64030%
Prostate Cancer Foundation$1,25050%
Impact Grants Chicago$1,10010%
The Breast Cancer Research Foundation Inc$87030%
American Friends of Hebrew University Inc$50010%
Temple Sinai of Palm Desert$1622n/a
The Mabel Mercer Foundation Inc$10010%
American Heart Association Inc$10020%
Jewish Fellowship of Hemlock Farms Inc$852n/a
Paws & Hearts$6020%
Chicago Public Library Foundation$501n/a
Lung Cancer Research Foundation$5010%

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 12 recipients with no EIN on record ($23k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Irving and Adele Rosenberg Foundati Attn Michael and Nancy Herman supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 17 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNorth Shore Country Day School: $74,429 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetEisenhower Medical Center: $72,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDalton Schools Inc: $34,286 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Catherine Cook School: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPalm Springs Friends of Philharmonic: $10,140 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetGreens Farms Academy Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLiterary Society of the Desert: $7,470 over 7y, 94% of budgetHemlock Farms Vol Fire & Rescue Com: $1,750 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetPlay for Pink Inc: $1,640 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetProstate Cancer Foundation: $1,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetImpact Grants Chicago: $1,100 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Breast Cancer Research Foundation Inc: $870 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Friends of Hebrew University Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Mabel Mercer Foundation Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPaws & Hearts: $60 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLung Cancer Research Foundation: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 17.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Federation of Metropolitan ChicagoIL15.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Irving and Adele Rosenberg Foundati Attn Michael and Nancy Herman with peer funders

About Irving and Adele Rosenberg Foundati Attn Michael and Nancy Herman

How much does Irving and Adele Rosenberg Foundati Attn Michael and Nancy Herman give?
Irving and Adele Rosenberg Foundati Attn Michael and Nancy Herman reported 9 grants totaling $53,530 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 9 and 15 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Irving and Adele Rosenberg Foundati Attn Michael and Nancy Herman fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Religion (49%), Education (27%), Health (14%).
Who are Irving and Adele Rosenberg Foundati Attn Michael and Nancy Herman's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Central Synagogue ($164k), Temple Sholom of Chicago ($89k), North Shore Country Day School ($74k).
Does Irving and Adele Rosenberg Foundati Attn Michael and Nancy Herman fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 11% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Irving and Adele Rosenberg Foundati Attn Michael and Nancy Herman accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Irving and Adele Rosenberg Foundati Attn Michael and Nancy Herman?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago, The Ayco Charitable Foundation, The Chicago Community Trust.
Where is Irving and Adele Rosenberg Foundati Attn Michael and Nancy Herman based?
Irving and Adele Rosenberg Foundati Attn Michael and Nancy Herman is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Irving and Adele Rosenberg Foundati Attn Michael and Nancy Herman’s filings →

More from the funding graph