· Private foundation
Ir Tua KD&ML Steadley Charitable
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $4k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $231k
- $50k–250k8 grants · $830k
- $250k+1 grant · $924k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CARTHAGE R-9 SCHOOL FOUNDATION | $924,000 |
| MISSOURI SOUTHERN FOUNDATION | $200,000 |
| CARTHAGE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP | $200,000 |
| FAIR ACRES FAMILY Y INC | $100,000 |
| JASPER COUNTY YOUTH FAIR INC | $100,000 |
| HERE 4 CARTHAGE | $75,000 |
| CHILDRENS HAVEN OF SW MISSOURI | $55,000 |
| CARTHAGE HUMANE SOCIETY | $50,000 |
| CARTHAGE HISTORIC PRESERVATION | $50,000 |
| VISION CARTHAGE | $40,000 |
| KELLOGG LAKE NATURE CENTER | $35,000 |
| AREA AGENCY ON AGING REGION X | $35,000 |
| CARTHAGE PUBLIC LIBRARY | $30,947 |
| BOOTS COURT FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| CITY OF CARTHAGE | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $279k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
14 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $245k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CRCARTHAGE R-9 SCHOOL FOUNDATION3× · 2023–2025 · $2.0M · revenue +138%
- MSMISSOURI SOUTHERN FOUNDATION3× · 2023–2025 · $600k · revenue +7%
- AAAREA AGENCY ON AGING REGION X2× · 2023–2025 · $60k · revenue +9%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $200k
- CCCARTHAGE CROSSLINES MINISTRYone grant, 2023 · $200k · revenue -5%
- MHMERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION JOPLINgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $175k · revenue +43%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide financial support to the carthage public library, a municipally owned library in carthage, missouri.
To provide fire protection services to the city of carthage, texas.
The foundation will promote charitable gifts to ensure excellence in community healthcare. the foundation is dedicated to ensuring that the carthage area retains and maintains a local hospital, which delivers quality primary healthcare to…
Collection and preservation of historical documents pertaining to saint charles county, missouri and making them available to the general public
To protect, shelter and promote the adoption of homeless animals; to provide education about responsible pet ownership and to reduce pet overpopulation through spay/neuter programs.
The primary function of the East Carroll Council on Aging, Inc. is to improve the quality of life for the parish's elderly and to provide services to the elderly as well as coordinate and monitor the services of other local agencies…
To foster and promote public knowledge of, and interest in, the history and culture of the peoples of carteret county and related areas through the collection, preservation, interpretation, and documentation of written and tangible…
Support local library
To provide home respite, housekeeping and other assistance to seniors age 60 and older that are residents of Christian County, Missouri
Establish a vital presence of the arts, history, and cultural awareness for the benefit, enlightenment, and enjoyment of all chickasaw county residents and visitors.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Carthage Humane Society Inc and the most unlike its peers is Jasper County Youth Fair Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 26. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 7% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CARTHAGE R-9 SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CARTHAGE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
- Who funds MISSOURI SOUTHERN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VISION CARTHAGE ↗
- Who funds CARTHAGE CROSSLINES MINISTRY ↗
- Who funds FAIR ACRES FAMILY YMCA INC ↗
- Who funds MERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION JOPLIN ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HAVEN OF SOUTHWEST MISSO ↗
- Who funds CARTHAGE HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds JASPER COUNTY YOUTH FAIR INC ↗
- Who funds Carthage Historic Preservation ↗
- Who funds OZARK TRI-COUNTY HEALTH CARE CONSORTIUM ↗
- Who funds AREA AGENCY ON AGING REGION X ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY CLINIC OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI ↗
- Who funds NEW HEIGHTS CHRISTIAN ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds Boots Court Foundation ↗
- Who funds CARTHAGE ARTS SUPPORT TEAM ↗
- Who funds FOSTERING HOPE ↗
- Who funds CARTHAGE CRISIS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds LIFECHOICES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · W R Corley Memorial Trust CO SMB Trust Services · Arvest Foundation · Ruth I Kolpin Foundation · Helen S Boylan Foundation · McCune-Brooks Health Care Foundation Inc · Jean Jack and Mildred Lemons Charitable Trust · Jasper County Association for Social Ser · Ozarks Food Harvest Inc · Marsh Family Fdn · Carthage Area United Way · Cloyd a Carlin Charitable Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Ir Tua KD&ML Steadley Charitable funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Ir Tua KD&ML Steadley Charitable?
Find your warmest path to Ir Tua KD&ML Steadley Charitable through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.