Skip to content
Iowa Health Care Association Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Iowa Health Care Association Foundation

To provide scholarships for the employees of member facilities of the iowa health care association who are furthering their health care education

$5.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
287
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Health$5.7MHuman Services$4.0MPublic Safety & Disaster$254kHousing & Shelter$216kCommunity Improvement$21kInternational$18k
02FY2024 · 287 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 287 grants below total $4,083,617, the rows itemized in this filing. The $5,399,545 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,315,928 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k165 grants · $1.2M
  • $10k–50k115 grants · $2.5M
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $421k
$9,150
Median grant
1
States reached
$329k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BISHOP DRUMM RETIREMENT CENTER$75,224
RIDGECREST VILLAGE$68,170
GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY - OTTUMWA$65,064
PILLAR OF CEDAR VALLEY$57,178
GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY - DAVENPORT$54,308
LUTHER MANOR COMMUNITIES$50,674
REGENCY CARE CENTER$50,657
TRINITY CENTER AT LUTHER PARK$49,485
KAHL HOME FOR AGED & INFIRM$47,602
BETHANY LUTHERAN HOME$46,025
SCENIC MANOR$44,639
BETTENDORF HEALTH CARE CENTER$43,134
THE ALVERNO HEALTH CARE FACILITY$41,603
GOOD NEIGHBOR HOME$41,388
SISTERS OF CHARITY OF THE BVMMT CARMEL$41,128
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 68% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SANFORD SENIOR CARE SHELDON: $13k → 8%GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY - MANSON: $21k → 9%ELM CREST RETIREMENT COMMUNITY: $14k → 9%HALCYON HOUSE: $21k → 10%LAKESIDE LUTHERAN HOME: $22k → 11%GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY - SAINT ANSGAR: $14k → 12%GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY - ESTHERVILLE: $29k → 12%GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY - DAVENPORT: $54k → 12%PARKVIEW HOME: $13k → 12%GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY - OTTUMWA: $65k → 16%MAYFLOWER HOME: $24k → 9%UNITED PRESBYTERIAN HOME: $15k → 10%GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY - ESTHERVILLE: $14k → 12%EXIRA CARE CENTER: $24k → 12%I O O F HOME AND COMMUNITY THERAPY CENTER: $35k → 12%RIDGECREST VILLAGE: $68k → 12%HERITAGE HOUSE: $11k → 14%NORTHCREST COMMUNITY: $21k → 17%GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY - INDIANOLA: $35k → 6%EASTERN STAR MASONIC HOME: $30k → 9%GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY - ALGONA: $20k → 9%WESLEY PARK CENTRE: $20k → 9%GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY - HOLSTEIN: $16k → 10%UNITED PRESBYTERIAN HOME: $15k → 10%HUBBARD CARE CENTER: $24k → 11%WINDMILL MANOR: $48k → 15%GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY - LE MARS: $21k → 7%GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY - GEORGE: $20k → 7%CEDAR MANOR NURSING HOME: $22k → 8%GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY - ALGONA: $19k → 9%GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY - HOLSTEIN: $12k → 10%GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY - FOREST CITY: $15k → 10%GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY - INDIANOLA: $26k → 6%WOODLAND TERRACE: $40k → 7%GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY - FOREST CITY: $13k → 10%STONEHILL CARE CENTER: $73k → 11%THE SUITES AT WESTERN HOME COMMUNITIES: $36k → 17%THE VILLAGE: $21k → 6%GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY - LE MARS: $14k → 7%WINDMILL MANOR: $13k → 15%RISEN SON CHRISTIAN VILLAGE: $23k → 12%MARTIN HEALTH CENTER INC: $20k → 17%RISEN SON CHRISTIAN VILLAGE: $22k → 12%METH WICK HEALTH CENTER: $27k → 9%STONEHILL CARE CENTER: $19k → 11%PLEASANTVIEW HOME: $14k → 15%BISHOP DRUMM RETIREMENT CENTER: $75k → 10%WESLEY ACRES: $32k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.8M · 141 repeat orgs$2.3M to everyone else

141 repeat relationships: 141 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 56 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

141
53

Total granted

$7.8M
$782k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+15%

Still filing today

41%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.6M went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    CARE INITIATIVES
    2× · 2023–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +4%
  • TE
    THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $436k · revenue +6%
  • WR
    WESLEY RETIREMENT SERVICES INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $139k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • OW
    ON WITH LIFE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $24k · revenue +15%
  • AH
    ACCURA HEALTHCARE OF OGDEN LLC
    one grant, 2023 · $18k
  • AH
    ACCURA HEALTHCARE OF MANNING LLC
    one grant, 2023 · $18k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Garden Path Elder Living Inc

Garden Path Elder Living operates a residential care home for elders that provide assistance with daily living and nursing oversight.

Human Services
2
Lutheran Sunset Ministries

Our mission is to provide person-centered services based on christian values.

Housing & Shelter
3
Christian Care Retirement Apartments Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve

—
4
National Church Residences At Home Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.

—
5
National Church Residences At Home Hospice Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
6
National Church Residences At Home Health and Wellness Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
7
National Church Residences At Home Hospice

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
8
Luther Care Services

To provide nursing home care, residential care, and affordable housing for the elderly

Human Services
9
Luther Memorial Home

To provide a high level of comfort and security to its residents at a skilled level of care and assisted level of care.

Health
10
Lutheran Home for the Aged Development Corporation

To provide the highest quality of care to those in their golden years.

—
11
Wisconsin Lutheran Home Ministries Inc

To share christ's love as we serve the spiritual, physical, intellectual and emotional needs of people entrusted to our care and others whose lives we touch.

—
12
Catholic Eldercare

Catholic eldercare provides a full continuum of care for seniors. our goal is to support each person throughout the remainder of their lives in a holistic way. we provide care in partnership with family, church and community in as least…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lutheran Retirement Home; the most unlike its peers is Cedar Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

95 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 95 of the 250 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
92/95
Grantees still filing
73/95
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

REHABILITATION CENTER OF HAMPTON: $962,862 · OtherREHABILITATION CENTER OF HAMPTON+145 more: $4,738,388 · Other+145 moreCARE INITIATIVES: $1,212,896 · HealthCARE INITIATIVESGOOD SHEPHERD GERIATRIC CENTER INC: $105,327 · HealthSTL CARE COMPANY: $71,571 · Health+21 more: $697,926 · Health+21 moreTHE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY: $436,476 · Human ServicesTHE EVANGELICAL …WESLEY RETIREMENT SERVICES INC: $138,529 · Human ServicesWESLEY RETIREMEN…Stonehill Franciscan Services: $92,788 · Human ServicesStonehill Franci…CHI LIVING COMMUNITIES: $75,224 · Human ServicesCHI LIVING COMMU…MARTIN HEALTH CENTER INC: $71,221 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN RETIREMENT HOMES INC: $68,170 · Human ServicesRESIDENTIAL ALTERNATIVES OF ILLINOIS INC: $60,187 · Human ServicesBARTELS LUTHERAN HOME: $50,156 · Human Services+13 more: $402,798 · Human Services+13 moreFRIENDSHIP HAVEN INC: $77,742 · Housing & ShelterCEDAR FALLS LUTHERAN HOME: $67,711 · Housing & ShelterLutheran Home for the Aged Association - West: $63,697 · Housing & ShelterMADRID HOME FOR THE AGING: $44,137 · Housing & ShelterUNLIMITED DEVELOPMENT INC: $42,131 · Housing & ShelterPRAIRIE VIEW LEASING: $36,614 · Housing & ShelterPHS COUNCIL BLUFFS INC: $36,112 · Housing & ShelterCREEKSIDE INC: $27,585 · Housing & ShelterROTARY CLUB OF EAGLE GROVE HOME INC: $20,610 · Community Improvement
Other$5,701,250Health$2,087,720Human Services$1,395,549Housing & Shelter$395,729Community Improvement$20,610

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCARE INITIATIVES: $1,212,896 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY: $436,476 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWESLEY RETIREMENT SERVICES INC: $138,529 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGOOD SHEPHERD GERIATRIC CENTER INC: $105,327 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetStonehill Franciscan Services: $92,788 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDSHIP HAVEN INC: $77,742 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCHI LIVING COMMUNITIES: $75,224 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTL CARE COMPANY: $71,571 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMARTIN HEALTH CENTER INC: $71,221 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCHRISTIAN RETIREMENT HOMES INC: $68,170 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCEDAR FALLS LUTHERAN HOME: $67,711 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetKAHL HOME FOR THE AGED AND INFIRM: $67,691 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetThe Lutheran Home for the Aged Association-East: $67,508 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBETHANY MANOR INC AND AFFILIATES: $67,227 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGOOD NEIGHBOR SOCIETY: $66,707 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLutheran Home for the Aged Association - West: $63,697 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBETHANY LUTHERAN HOME: $60,688 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetRESIDENTIAL ALTERNATIVES OF ILLINOIS INC: $60,187 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAASE HAUGEN HOMES INC: $52,162 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBARTELS LUTHERAN HOME: $50,156 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLUTHER PARK HEALTH CARE CENTER INC: $49,485 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE LUTHERAN HOMES SOCIETY: $47,095 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetRISEN SON CHRISTIAN VILLAGE: $45,398 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetST LUKE HOMES & SERVICES INC: $44,639 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetIOWA ODD FELLOWS AND ORPHANS HOME CORP: $44,137 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetUNLIMITED DEVELOPMENT INC: $42,131 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEVANGELICAL RETIREMENT HOMES INC: $39,623 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBOARD OF TRUSTEES -GRAND CHARITY FU GRAND LODGE OF IOWA AF & AM: $39,623 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHOLY SPIRIT RETIREMENT HOME INC: $39,122 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetST FRANCIS MANOR INC: $39,121 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetEASTERN STAR MASONIC HOME: $38,119 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCHILDSERVE HABILITATION CENTER: $37,115 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPRAIRIE VIEW LEASING: $36,614 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetWESTHAVEN COMMUNITY MINISTRY OF THE EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH: $36,562 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSt Anthony Regional Hospital and Nursing Home: $36,225 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPHS COUNCIL BLUFFS INC: $36,112 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetIOWA JEWISH SENIOR LIFE CENTER: $36,112 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSIMPSON MEMORIAL HOME INC: $36,074 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetGlen Haven Home Inc: $35,232 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWELLSPIRE LLC: $35,109 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE METH-WICK COMMUNITY INC: $34,608 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY MEMORIAL HEALTH CENTER: $34,106 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSUNRISE MANOR: $33,844 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MARIAN HOME: $33,203 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHILLCREST HOME: $30,595 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBVM-PHS SENIOR HOUSING INC: $30,094 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHUBBARD CARE CENTER INC: $30,093 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetEXIRA CARE CENTER: $30,093 over 2y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Heart Associ…Community Fdn of Grea…Iowa Hospital Associa…Community Foundation …Siouxland Community F…The National Associat…American Endowment Fo…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
American Heart Association IncTX27.7× affinity24 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Heart Association Inc · Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community Fdn · Iowa Hospital Association · Community Foundation of Greater Dubuque · Siouxland Community Foundation · The National Association for the Exchange of Industrial Resources Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Iowa Health Care Association Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Iowa Health Care Association Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    36report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 250 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $100k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Iowa Health Care Association’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home