Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Iowa Council of Foundations

To strengthen and promote organized philanthropy in the state of iowa; to assist and educate its membership in order to promote and facilitate effective philanthropic grantmaking; and to provide a forum for the exchange of information on philanthropic programs and issues.

$73k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Iowa Council of Foundations’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Community Fdn Of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community Fdn, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

1
17
0
18
0
19
0
20
0
21
0
22
0
23
1
24
0
25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Philanthropy$669kCommunity Improvement$15k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 3 grants below total $36,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $73,175 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $37,175 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$9,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$383k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER DM$20,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER DUB$9,000
CEDAR FALLS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$7,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%OMAHA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $15k → 12%OKOBOJI COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $7k → 7%GREATER POWESHIEK COMMUNITY FOUND: $7k → 9%GREATER CEDAR RAPIDS COMMUNITY FOUN: $15k → 9%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER DM: $50k → 10%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER DUB: $35k → 11%POTTAWATTAMIE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUN: $15k → 12%QUAD CITIES COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $15k → 12%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER MUS: $22k → 12%SIOUXLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $13k → 13%KEOKUK AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $8k → 14%WAYNE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $7k → 15%SOUTH CENTRAL IOWA COMMUNITY FOUND: $15k → 16%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NE IOWA: $18k → 17%OKOBOJI COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $7k → 7%GREATER POWESHIEK COMMUNITY FOUNDAT: $6k → 9%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER DM: $23k → 10%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER DUB: $35k → 11%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR WESTERN IA: $11k → 12%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER MUS: $16k → 12%SIOUXLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $7k → 13%KEOKUK AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $6k → 14%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NE IOWA: $15k → 17%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER DM: $20k → 10%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER DUB: $27k → 11%POTTAWATTAMIE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUN: $10k → 12%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER MUS: $15k → 12%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTHEAST I: $15k → 17%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER DM: $19k → 10%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER DUB: $26k → 11%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER MUS: $15k → 12%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTHEAST I: $10k → 17%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER DES: $14k → 10%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER DUB: $21k → 11%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER MUS: $5k → 12%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTHEAST I: $9k → 17%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER DES: $10k → 10%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER DUB: $18k → 11%CEDAR FALLS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $7k → 17%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER DM: $8k → 10%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER DUB: $12k → 11%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NE IOWA: $6k → 17%DALLAS COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $8k → 10%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER DUB: $9k → 11%KOSSUTH COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Foundation of Grand Forks East Grand Forks and Region

To connect people who care with causes that matter.

Philanthropy
2
Community Foundation of Southeast Kansas

The Community Foundation of Southeast Kansas servces the region by encouraging charitable giving benefiting the common good and the quality of life.

Philanthropy
3
Montgomery County Community Foundation

The mission of the Montgomery County Community Foundation (MCCF) is to provide leadership in Montgomery County by directing sustainable financial resources that strengthen our community and improve the quality of life for current and…

Philanthropy
4
Community Foundation of Jackson County

Benefit charitable and educational community projects in the jackson county area.

Philanthropy
5
Waukesha County Community Foundation

Wccf is a pool of permanent endowment and project funds created primarily by and for the people of waukesha county to provide grant support to charitable organizations. the intent of the foundation is to serve a broad spectrum of the…

Philanthropy
6
Community Foundation of Lorain County

The community foundation responds to the changing needs of the community by making grants to local nonprofit organizations, awarding scholarships to help local students, working together with donors to build community endowment and…

Philanthropy
7
Missoula Community Foundation

To enhance community vitality by inspiring community giving and strengthening nonprofits

Community Improvement
8
Community Foundation of Shelby County

To inspire donor generosity and transform it into meaningful, lasting impact through charitable gifts.

Philanthropy
9
Community Foundation for Loudoun and Northern Fauquier Counties

To grow community giving by fostering a community of grantmakers, promoting strategic local leadership, and investing in partnerships for the benefit of the community of loudoun and northern fauquier.

Philanthropy
10
The Community Foundation of Dickinson County Inc

To connect donors with their charitable giving priorities, serve as a resource for local nonprofit organizations and provide leadership to the community.

Philanthropy
11
Kenosha Community Foundation

We lead, serve and collaborate with donors to create enduring philanthropy.

Philanthropy
12
Community Foundation of Southern New Mexico

The Community Foundation of Southern New Mexico serves as a community resource, connects donors to needs, and supports charitable organizations in their work.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Cedar Rapids Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Okoboji Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER DUBUQUE — $182,584 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER DUBUQUECOMMUNITY FDN OF GREATER DES MOINES F/K/A GREATER DES MOINES COMMUNITY FDN — $164,405 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FDN OF GREATER DES MOINES F/K/A GREATER DES MOINES COMMUNITY FDNCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTHEAST IOWA — $78,690 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTHEAST IOWACOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER MUSCATINE — $72,850 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER MUSCATINECOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR WESTERN IOWA — $35,500 · Philanthropy+10 more — $135,375 · Philanthropy+10 moreOKOBOJI FOUNDATION — $14,400 · Other
Philanthropy$669,404Other$14,400

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER DUBUQUE — $182,584 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY FDN OF GREATER DES MOINES F/K/A GREATER DES MOINES COMMUNITY FDN — $164,405 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTHEAST IOWA — $78,690 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER MUSCATINE — $72,850 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR WESTERN IOWA — $35,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSIOUXLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $20,180 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWATERLOO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $15,800 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetGREATER CEDAR RAPIDS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOmaha Community Foundation — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetQUAD CITIES COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSouth Central Iowa Community Founda — $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetKEOKUK AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $13,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetGreater Poweshiek Community Foundation — $12,375 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCEDAR FALLS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $7,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetWAYNE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $6,520 over 1y, 5.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community FdnIA14.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community Fdn · Land O'Lakes Foundation · The Hws Charitable Foundation Inc · GreenState Credit Union · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Edward Jones Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Iowa Council of Foundations funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph