Skip to content

· Public charity

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union No 5

The labor union's objectives are to promote reasonable methods of work, higher standards of living, adequate pay for work performed and assist members in times of sickness and distress.

$2.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
32
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$428k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Community Improvement$9.5MEducation$331kPublic Benefit$233kHealth$200kPhilanthropy$186kEmployment$169kFood & Nutrition$132kArts & Culture$111kOther$0
02FY2025 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 32 grants below total $1,918,834, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,968,834 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $50,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $71k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $202k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $934k
  • $250k+2 grants · $712k
$25,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$62M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RIGHT ELECTRICAL CONTRACTING$427,652
HALLSTROM-CLARK ELECTRIC$284,500
SARGENT ELECTRIC$202,334
MCCROSSIN ELECTRIC INC$150,000
CHRIS LEVITT ELECTRIC$98,500
MARSULA ELECTRIC$97,000
PURE TECH INC$93,798
WELLINGTON POWER$80,000
Individual grant recipient$62,500
FERRY ELECTRIC$50,000
M & J ELECTRICAL$50,000
REAL RESULTS FOR PENNSYLVANIA$50,000
ALLEGHENY COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY$25,000
IBEW UNITY FUND$25,000
UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWESTERN PA$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $39k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOLY FAMILY INSTITUTE: $8k → 11%HOLY FAMILY INSTITUTE: $8k → 11%HOLY FAMILY INSTITUTE: $8k → 11%HOLY FAMILY INSTITUTE: $9k → 11%HOLY FAMILY INSTITUTE: $8k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MA
OH
PA
WV
VA
MD
TN
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$11M · 47 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

47 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

47
36

Total granted

$11M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+2%

Still filing today

38%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $280k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationEnvironmentCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IB
    INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS
    5× · 2017–2025 · $125k · revenue +25%
  • UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
    2× · 2017–2018 · $120k · revenue +44%
  • GP
    GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK
    5× · 2020–2024 · $101k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • GI
    GUMPHER INC
    one grant, 2024 · $195k
  • EE
    ELCO ELECTRICAL COMPANY INC
    one grant, 2024 · $175k
  • B
    BLACKHAWKNEFF
    one grant, 2018 · $124k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Western Pennsylvania Conservancy

The western pennsylvania conservancy protects and restores exceptional places to provide our region with clean waters and healthy forests, wildlife and natural areas for the benefit of present and future generations. the conservancy…

Environment
2
Pennsylvania Builders Association

Incorporated in 1945, the pennsylvania builders association is a nonprofit professional trade organization representing approximately 4,066 members from across the commonwealth. pba members include contractors, builders, and remodelers,…

—
3
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
4
Pennsylvania Academic Library Consortium Inc

To support education and research at college, university, and research libraries.

Education
5
Pennsylvania Chamber of Business and Industry

The pennsylvania chamber of business and industry is the largest broad-based business association in pennsylvania. thousands of members throughout the commonwealth employ greater than 50 percent of pennsylvania's private workforce.…

—
6
Zoological Society of Pittsburgh

The zoological society of pittsburgh is dedicated to being a leader in, and significant contributor to, the conservation of endangered and threatened species. the society provides an enjoyable family experience that fosters understanding,…

Animals
7
Allegheny Conference On Community Development

See schedule othe allegheny conference on community development (accd) and affiliates - the greater pittsburgh chamber of commerce (chamber), the pennsylvania economy league of greater pittsburgh(pelgp) and the pittsburgh regional alliance…

—
8
Pittsburgh Business Group On Health

An employer-led coalition that champions outcomes-based, cost-effective healthcare through education, market expertise, group purchasing, comparative data and decision support.

—
9
Pittsburgh Council On Higher Education

To provide a means for sharing resources and information among members, engage in joint projects, and offer a common voice on educational matters.

Education
10
Greater Philadelphia Tourism Marketing Corporation

Visit philadelphia is our name and our mission. as the region's official tourism marketing agency, we build greater philadelphia's image, drive visitation and boost the economy.

Community Improvement
11
Pennsylvania Economy League Inc

The pennsylvania economy league (pel) is an independent non-profit public policy research and development organization comprised of three limited liability companies: pel, southeastern pa, llc, dba economy league of greater philadelphia;…

—
12
Pennsylvania State Education Association

We support, empower, and advocate for members, students, and public education.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Pittsburgh; the most unlike its peers is Muscular Dystrophy Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 92 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
15/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHRIS LEVITT ELECTRIC: $1,124,500 · OtherCHRIS LEVITT ELECTRICRIGHT ELECTRICAL CONTRACTING: $1,068,952 · OtherRIGHT ELECTRICAL CONTRACTINGIndividual grant recipient: $1,053,462 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPRECISION ELECTRICAL: $922,400 · OtherPRECISION ELECTRICALWELLINGTON POWER: $900,700 · OtherWELLINGTON POWERMARSULA ELECTRIC: $862,500 · OtherMARSULA ELECTRICPURE TECH INC: $575,232 · OtherSARGENT ELECTRIC: $538,420 · OtherHALLSTROM-CLARK ELECTRIC: $446,500 · Other+70 more: $4,126,733 · Other+70 moreTHE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA: $152,950 · PhilanthropyPASSAVANT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $11,000 · PhilanthropyMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $50,500 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $40,000 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INC: $32,000 · HealthEPILEPSY ASSOCIATION OF WESTERN AND CENTRAL PA: $10,000 · HealthPittsburgh Action Against Rape: $7,750 · HealthUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $120,000 · EducationTHE PITTSBURGH CONTINGENCY INC: $18,000 · EducationGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $101,000 · Food & NutritionUNION SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE: $80,750 · EnvironmentKEYSTONE ELK COUNTRY ALLIANCE: $10,000 · EnvironmentHISTORICAL SOCIETY OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA: $70,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$11,619,399Philanthropy$163,950Health$140,250Education$138,000Food & Nutrition$101,000Environment$90,750Arts & Culture$70,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA: $152,950 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS: $125,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $120,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $101,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNION SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE: $80,750 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetREAL RESULTS FOR PENNSYLVANIA: $75,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetHISTORICAL SOCIETY OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA: $70,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $50,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPA ALLIANCE ACTION: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALLEGHENY COUNTY LABOR COUNCIL: $44,250 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOLY FAMILY INSTITUTE: $38,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN IRELAND FUND (DBA THE IRELAND FUNDS AMERICA/THE IRELAND FUNDS): $37,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL AVIARY IN PITTSBURGH INC: $35,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $32,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHOLY FAMILY FOUNDATION: $24,150 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA AFL-CIO: $18,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE PITTSBURGH CONTINGENCY INC: $18,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetPASSAVANT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $11,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEPILEPSY ASSOCIATION OF WESTERN AND CENTRAL PA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetKEYSTONE ELK COUNTRY ALLIANCE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPITTSBURGH A PHILLIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE EDUCATION FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetALLEGHENY COUNTY PARKS FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPittsburgh Action Against Rape: $7,750 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds UNION SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds REAL RESULTS FOR PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PA ALLIANCE ACTION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pittsburgh FoundationPA19.9× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · United Steel Paper and Forestry Rubber Manufacturing Energy Allied · The Jack Buncher Foundation · Richard King Mellon Foundation · Eqt Foundation · United Steelworkers Intl Group Return · Clapp G H Decd Char and Ed Tr · Michael Baker International Foundation · Allegheny Foundation · Pittsburgh Penguins Foundation · American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union No 5 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union No 5. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 92 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union No 5’s filings →

    More from the funding graph