· Public charity
International Brotherhood of Boilermakers Iron Ship Builders
International labor union
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 9 grants below total $211,600 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $308,436 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $96,836 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k8 grants · $145k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $67k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNION SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE | $66,800 |
| ROSIE THE RIVETER TRUST | $35,000 |
| NORTH AMERICA'S BUILDING TRADES UNIONS | $25,000 |
| NMAPC | $25,000 |
| CENTRAL LABOR COUNCIL OF CCC (AFL-CIO) | $15,000 |
| LABORLAB | $14,800 |
| UA CHARITABLE FUND TRUST | $10,000 |
| SHOOT FOR A CURE | $10,000 |
| LABOR OF LOVE | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $237k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 15% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.
16 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- USUNION SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE9× · 2017–2025 · $641k · revenue +6%
- AEAdopt-A-Native Elder7× · 2017–2024 · $188k · revenue +138%
- BABUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES DEPARTMENT AFL-CIO4× · 2019–2025 · $85k · revenue +9%
Funded once
- CLCALIFORNIA LABOR FEDERATION STANDING COMMITTEE ON POLITICAL EDUCATIONone grant, 2021 · $200k
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCone grant, 2022 · $52k · revenue -40%
NAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +39%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The work of the union, as the representative of its members, is to provide for the continuous employment of labor, to bring about stable conditions in the industry, and to establish necessary procedures for resolutions of disputes between…
Union hall devoted to the betterment of members compensation and working conditions, to secure recognition of workers rights to engage in collective bargaining, and to promote the development and maintenance of on-the-job safety practices…
To organize all workers for the economic, moral, and social advancement of their condition and status.
Secure fair compensation and working conditions for all members.
A fraternal labor organization whose purpose is to promote employment of members in a safe work environment and ensurefair labor practices.
The local is a nonprofit organization established to represent its members in wage and fringe benefits matters in the construction industry. the local's primary areas of jurisdiction are oakland and livingston counties.
American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…
To anticipate for, and capitalize on the ever-changing economic, social, political and legal challenges facing our union; to provide an unmatched level of services to members through a dedicated, loyal team of professionals.
To improve working conditions and living standards of members through collective bargaining, education, training, and employee benefits.
The northwest regional organizing coalition (nroc) is established and exists to increase union participation in the industries in which the laborers' international union of north america (liuna!) currently represents workers. it is nroc's…
Our mission is to act as an advocate for the union construction and maintenance industry advancing the cause through an educated and action-driven membership. we aim to enhance labor-management cooperation, workplace safety and health, and…
Founded in 1889, the national association of regulatory utility commisioners (naruc) is a non-profit organization dedicated to representing the state public service commisions who regulate the utilities that provide essential services such…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Working America Education Fund and the most unlike its peers is Fishing for Freedom Quincy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNION SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds Adopt-A-Native Elder ↗
- Who funds ROSIE THE RIVETER TRUST ↗
- Who funds BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES DEPARTMENT AFL-CIO ↗
- Who funds CONTRA COSTA LABOR COUNCIL AFL-CIO ↗
- Who funds ECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR MILITARY RECRUITMENT ASSESSMENT AND VETERANS EMPLOYMENT ↗
- Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT LABOR- MANAGEMENT POLICY COMMITTEE ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds SHOOT FOR A CURE ↗
- Who funds THE ROOSEVELT INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds NAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC ↗
- Who funds Washington State Building & Construction Trades Council ↗
- Who funds THE LABOR HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES HIGH SPEED RAIL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL CONSUMERS LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds CHRISTOPHER P GARDNER FOUNDATI ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds UNION VETERANS COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds LaborLab ↗
- Who funds COALITION OF LABOR UNION WOMEN ↗
- Who funds THE SALVATION ARMY WORLD SERVICE OFFICE ↗
- Who funds WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FISHING FOR FREEDOM QUINCY ↗
- Who funds MIKVA CHALLENGE GRANT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UA CHARITABLE FUND TRUST ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL WRESTLING HALL OF FAME ↗
- Who funds WORKING AMERICA EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds ALS ASSOCIATION LOUISIANA-MISSISSIPPI CH ↗
- Who funds International Guiding Eyes Inc DBA Guide Dogs of America ↗
- Who funds CARBON UTILIZATION RESEARCH COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds New Jersey State AFL-CIO COPE ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PETROLEUM GEOLOGISTS FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: International Union of Bricklayers & Allied Craftworkers · International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers · International Union of Painters and Allied Trades · American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations · Int Union United Auto National Community Action Program · International Brotherhood of Teamsters · Communications Workers of America Afl-Cio Clc · International Assn of Bridge Structural Ornamental and Reinforcing Iron Workers · United Food and Commercial Workers International Union · United Association of Journeymen & Apprentices of the Plumbing & Pipe · Greater Washington Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization International Brotherhood of Boilermakers Iron Ship Builders funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.