· Public charity
Interfaith Social Action Council of
All income from sales of donated clothing and items goes to finance scholarships for dozen of students, charitable donations to food bank and emergency assistance programs, and operating expenses.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2022.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 10 grants below total $76,340 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $270,440 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $194,100 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k7 grants · $46k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Our Lady of Guadalupe Food Pantry | $10,000 |
| United Methodist Church of SCC | $10,000 |
| Campaign Against Human Trafficking | $10,000 |
| Mary & Martha House | $8,600 |
| Sun City Center Emergency Squad | $8,240 |
| Samaritan Services | $7,800 |
| Gibsonton Elementary School | $6,000 |
| Sun City Center Security Patrcl Inc | $5,700 |
| Society of St Vincent DePaul | $5,000 |
| Kiwanis of South Shore | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–21, $48k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
5 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2022, 2 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 32% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $52k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MAMARY AND MARTHA HOUSE INC7× · 2019–2025 · $36k · revenue +106%
- SCSun City Center Security Patrol Inc7× · 2019–2025 · $33k · revenue -40%
- USUNITED STATES CATHOLIC CONFERENCE5× · 2020–2025 · $20k
Funded once
REDLANDS CHRISTIAN MIGRANT ASSOCIATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +86%- OLOUR LADY OF GUADALUPE FOOD PAone grant, 2019 · $10k
- SSSOUTH SHORE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH INCone grant, 2020 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Homeless Shelter
Provide homebound meals to low or moderate income elederly, rental assisstance, case management and housing inspections for hiv patients in miami dade county.
Our purpose is to provide safe living quarters for individuals that would be considered hard-to-place due to several reasons to include, but not limited to: homelessness, mental illness, bad credit, low income, drug abuse etc. To provide…
Since 1957, SRM has provided safe emergency shelter, meals, and clothing to anyone in need. All participants are experiencing homelessness and living below the federal poverty line at intake. Located in Flagstaff, we have three facilities.…
To identify, locate, and aid homeless individuals-specifically veterans-by providing emergency assistance, necessities, and housing resources
For 80 years, suncoast center, inc. has held true to its mission of "strengthening, protecting, and restoring lives for a healthy community" by providing a comprehensive range of evidence-based services that address emotional wellness,…
Dispense clothing, payment vouchers for food, shelter, medical, transportation on a non-sectarian basis to any resident of miami county where there is a need.
Lamp of Hope Ministries is a non profit organization committed to improving the well-being of families and individuals facing poverty homelessness domestic abuse low literacy military family service major illness and the aftermath of…
Providing food, transportation, shelter, medical and other living needs services for the needy in saint johns county, florida
The mission of meals on wheels plus of manatee, inc. is to assist individuals to live independently by providing nutrition and caring supportive services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Good Samaritan Fund & Services and the most unlike its peers is Winthrop Arts Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MARY AND MARTHA HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds Sun City Center Security Patrol Inc ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL PRINCE OF PEACE CONFERENCE ↗
- Who funds REDLANDS CHRISTIAN MIGRANT ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUMAN TRAFFICKING SOUTHSHORE INC ↗
- Who funds THE LORDS LIGHTHOUSE MINISTRY INC ↗
- Who funds MY WARRIOR'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds SUN CITY CENTER EMERGENCY SQUAD NUMBER ONE INC ↗
- Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN FUND & SERVICES ↗
- Who funds TAMPA METROPOLITAN AREA YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc ↗
- Who funds WINTHROP ARTS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc · Gladys and Mildred Tomiak Foundation Inc C/O Bradley Bailyn · United Way Suncoast Inc · Debartolo Family Foundation Inc · Allegany Franciscan Ministries Inc · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Interfaith Social Action Council of funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Redlands Christian Migrant Association Inc — 51% of income from government
- Tampa Metropolitan Area Young Men's Christian Association Inc — 4% of income from government
- Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Interfaith Social Action Council of?
Find your warmest path to Interfaith Social Action Council of through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.