How much did Interfaith Social Action Council of grant in FY2022?

Interfaith Social Action Council of reported 10 grants totaling $270,440 in its FY2022 IRS filing.

Where is Interfaith Social Action Council of based?

Interfaith Social Action Council of is based in FL.

Interfaith Social Action Council of

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

Interfaith Social Action Council of

All income from sales of donated clothing and items goes to finance scholarships for dozen of students, charitable donations to food bank and emergency assistance programs, and operating expenses.

$270k

Granted FY2022

Grants

Communities

$10k

Largest

01What you fund

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 73% of Interfaith Social Action Council of’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

rcmaredlandschristianmigrantnon-profitcorporationunder

2020

pantrysouthlivesloveofferextraordinary dogsvision loss

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2022 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

Under $10k7 grants · $46k
$10k–50k3 grants · $30k

$8,240

Median grant

States reached

$1.1M

Total assets

Largest grants

United Methodist Church of SCC$10,000
Campaign Against Human Trafficking$10,000
Our Lady of Guadalupe Food Pantry$10,000
Mary & Martha House$8,600
Sun City Center Emergency Squad$8,240
Samaritan Services$7,800
Gibsonton Elementary School$6,000
Sun City Center Security Patrcl Inc$5,700
Society of St Vincent DePaul$5,000
Kiwanis of South Shore$5,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–21, $48k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 12%. 96% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

38%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$122k · 5 repeat orgs$201k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2022, 2 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$122k

$149k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%

+55%

Still filing today

60%

30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 32% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $52k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesReligionArts & CulturePublic Safety & DisasterHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

MM
Mary Martha House
7× · 2019–2025 · $36k · revenue +121%
SC
Sun City Center Security Patrol Inc
7× · 2019–2025 · $33k · revenue +44%
SO
Society of St Vincent DePaul
2× · 2019–2021 · $17k · revenue +45%

Funded once

REDLND CHRIST MIGR ASSOC RCMAgraduated
one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +42%
SS
South Shore United Methodist Church
one grant, 2020 · $10k
OL
OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE FOOD PA
one grant, 2019 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Southwest Florida Retirement Center

Provide housing, healthcare, promote health & wellness as well as related services to seniors.

Human Services

Sunshine for Humanity Inc

Homeless Shelter

Health

Sunshine Rescue Mission

Since 1957, SRM has provided safe emergency shelter, meals, and clothing to anyone in need. All participants are experiencing homelessness and living below the federal poverty line at intake.Located in Flagstaff, we have three facilities.…

Religion

St Augustine Christian Service

Providing food, transportation, shelter, medical and other living needs services for the needy in saint johns county, florida

—

Lamp of Hope Ministry Inc

Lamp of Hope Ministries is a non profit organization committed to improving the well-being of families and individuals facing poverty homelessness domestic abuse low literacy military family service major illness and the aftermath of…

Human Services

South County Food Pantry Inc

Hunger relief for the indigent. The South County Food Pantry provides food to families and individuals in the Venice, Nokomis, Laurel & Osprey, areas of FL. SCFP distributes to more than 400 family units per month.

Food & Nutrition

Southern Baptist Hospital of Florida Inc

To make hope, healing and well-being accessible to every person as an expression of God's love.

Health

Society of St Vincent De Paul Inc

Dispense clothing, payment vouchers for food, shelter, medical, transportation on a non-sectarian basis to any resident of miami county where there is a need.

—

The Helping Hands Mission of Santa Rosa County

To provide assistance such as food, clothing and shelter to families and individuals in need

Human Services

Society of St Vincent De Paul

To operate a homeless day facility, which includes showers, laundry, hygiene items, food, mail, and a transitional work program. to provide direct assistance to the indigent in escambia and santa rosa county, florida through two area food…

Human Services

Hope South Florida Inc

Hope south florida placed 70 families - or approximately 210 people - in homes in 2024. this was a 40% increase over the prior year. additionally, more than 53,000 meals were served and 1,000 showers were provided over the same period.

Human Services

The South Florida Charity Classic

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mary and Martha House Inc and the most unlike its peers is Winthrop Arts Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

12/12

Grantees still filing

9/12

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$237,709Human Services$58,200Religion$10,000Public Safety & Disaster$8,240Health$7,800Arts & Culture$1,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Tampa Bay IncFL33.5× affinity14 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc · Rays Baseball Foundation Inc · United Way Suncoast Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation Interfaith Social Action Council of funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

4get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Campaign Against Human Trafficking.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~25 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 2 filed years.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

2 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 3.3× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 352457110 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on Campaign Against Human Trafficking, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 25 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 13% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Interfaith Social Action Council of?

Find your warmest path to Interfaith Social Action Council of through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

Interfaith Social Action Council of

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Interfaith Social Action Council of?

More from the funding graph

Interfaith Social Action Council of

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Interfaith Social Action Council of?

More from the funding graph