Skip to content
INTEGRIS Ambulatory Care Corp at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

INTEGRIS Ambulatory Care Corp

To improve the health of the people and communities we serve.

$277k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$149k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$7.6MPhilanthropy$108kCommunity Improvement$100kPublic Benefit$25kArts & Culture$23k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $23k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $249k
$100,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$295M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HEALTH ALLIANCE FOR THE UNINSURED$149,310
GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY CHAMBER$100,000
FIRST AMERICANS MUSEUM FOUNDATION$12,500
MARCH OF DIMES INC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $304k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HEALTH ALLIANCE FOR THE UNINSURED: $149k → 16%Health Alliance For the Uninsured: $142k → 16%FIRST AMERICANS MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $13k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.6M · 3 repeat orgs$316k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
5

Total granted

$7.6M
$204k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+3%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $113k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IS
    INTEGRIS So Oklahoma City Hosp Corp dba INTEGRIS Southwest Medical Center I nc
    3× · 2017–2019 · $7.3M · revenue +55%
  • Health Alliance for the Uninsured
    2× · 2024–2025 · $292k · revenue -18%
  • MARCH OF DIMES INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $20k · revenue 0%

Funded once

  • UW
    United Way of Central Oklahoma Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $108k · revenue 0%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $51k · revenue +10%
  • OS
    Oklahoma State Chamber of Commerce and Industry Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oklahoma Hospital Association Inc

The mission of the Oklahoma Hospital Association is to promote the welfare of the public by representing its members and advocating on their behalf, providing services to assist its members in meeting the health care needs of their…

—
2
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
3
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
4
Tulsa Area United Way

The tulsa area united way unites people and resources to improve lives and strengthen our communities.

—
5
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
6
Oklahoma State Medical Association

Osma's vision is to be the leading voice in health care for oklahoma's patients, families and physicians. osma's mission is better health for oklahoma.

—
7
Tulsa Regional Chamber (Fka Metropolitan Tulsa Chamber of Commerce)

The tulsa regional chamber transforms the tulsa region by attracting and retaining employers, talent and tourism for long-term prosperity.

—
8
Integrated Healthcare Association

Iha's mission is to bring the healthcare community together to solve industry-wide challenges that stand in the way of high-value care. as a non-profit industry association, we use objective data, our decades of expertise, and our unique…

—
9
American Health Law Association

The mission of the american health law association is to deliver authoritative educational content and serve as a professional home for all who engage with health law.

—
10
University of Florida Health Corporation

UF Health's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across the spectrum of basic,…

—
11
Western Electricity Coordinating Council

To effectively and efficiently mitigate risks to the reliability and security of the western interconnection's bulk power system.

Public Benefit
12
Yuma Regional Medical Center

The purpose of yuma regional medical center is "building a healthier tomorrow." we are guided by three pillars: (1) putting patients first; (2) rooted in the community and; (3) committed to progress.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Central Oklahoma Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INTEGRIS So Oklahoma City Hosp Corp dba INTEGRIS Southwest Medical Center I nc: $7,263,667 · HealthINTEGRIS So Oklahoma City Hosp Corp dba INTEGRIS Southwest Medical Center I nc+3 more: $80,500 · HealthHealth Alliance for the Uninsured: $291,510 · Human ServicesFIRST AMERICANS MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $12,500 · Human ServicesGREATER OKLAHOMA CITY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC: $100,000 · OtherOklahoma State Chamber of Commerce and Industry Inc: $25,265 · OtherUnited Way of Central Oklahoma Inc: $107,750 · PhilanthropyALLIED ARTS OF OKLAHOMA INC: $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Health$7,344,167Human Services$304,010Other$125,265Philanthropy$107,750Arts & Culture$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINTEGRIS So Oklahoma City Hosp Corp dba INTEGRIS Southwest Medical Center I nc: $7,263,667 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetHealth Alliance for the Uninsured: $291,510 over 2y, 11% of budgetUnited Way of Central Oklahoma Inc: $107,750 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $50,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOklahoma State Chamber of Commerce and Industry Inc: $25,265 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST AMERICANS MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $12,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALLIED ARTS OF OKLAHOMA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

INTEGRIS Baptist Medi…Mercy Hospital Oklaho…INTEGRIS Health INCSsm Health Care of Ok…
INTEGRIS Baptist Medical Center IncOK15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: INTEGRIS Baptist Medical Center Inc · Mercy Hospital Oklahoma City · INTEGRIS Health INC · Ssm Health Care of Oklahoma Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization INTEGRIS Ambulatory Care Corp funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from INTEGRIS Ambulatory Care Corp. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • First Americans Museum Foundation: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on INTEGRIS Ambulatory Care’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home