Skip to content
Int Union United Auto National Community Action Program at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Int Union United Auto National Community Action Program

Meetings, education, communication, community action and donations, non-partisan voter registration, administration of the organization, maintenance of its properties and assets, fraternal and social activities and related activities which further the common interest of the membership.

$90k
Granted FY2023
5
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2023.

Public Benefit$2.9MCivil Rights$978kEmployment$658kCommunity Improvement$548kSocial Science$398kArts & Culture$312kEducation$221kMembership Benefit$110kOther$0
02FY2023 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $70,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $90,200 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $20,200 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$228k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OTSEGO COUNTY UNITED WAY$30,000
LABOR COUNCIL FOR LATIN AMERICAN ADVANCEMENT (LCLAA)$10,000
PRIDE WORK$10,000
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS$10,000
COALITION OF BLACK TRADE UNIONISTS$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 81% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $25k → 16%ONE FAIR WAGE ACTION INC: $75k → 10%JOBS TO MOVE AMERICA: $25k → 14%UNITED FARM WORKERS: $25k → 18%GOOD JOBS FIRST: $25k → 14%HILLSIDE PRODUCTIONS INC: $125k → 8%OTSEGO COUNTY UNITED WAY: $30k → 11%MICHIGAN AFL-CIO: $300k → 16%MICHIGAN FOR ALL: $150k → 21%ONE WISCONSIN NOW: $25k → 10%TN STATE CONFERENCE NAACP: $30k → 15%NC STATE AFL-CIO: $75k → 8%UAW ILLINOIS STATE CAP COUNCIL: $100k → 8%HOME MEANS NEVADA PAC: $50k → 13%COMMUNITY PARTNERS: $25k → 14%UNITED FARM WORKERS: $25k → 18%ROOSEVELT INSTITUTE: $25k → 17%HILLSIDE PRODUCTIONS INC: $125k → 8%ONE WISCONSIN NOW: $25k → 10%TN STATE CONFERENCE NAACP: $30k → 15%NC STATE AFL-CIO: $25k → 8%THE EMG FOUNDATION: $30k → 8%ROB MURPHY FOUNDATION: $25k → 21%THE GOOD LAND COMMITTEE INC: $500k → 10%DETROIT BRANCH NAACP: $150k → 21%DETROIT BRANCH NAACP: $150k → 21%DEMOCRATIC GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION: $2.0M → 14%DETROIT BRANCH NAACP: $150k → 21%DEMOCRACY INITIATIVE: $150k → 14%DPGL LLC: $75k → 21%ECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE: $100k → 14%WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY: $72k → 21%NATIONAL ACTION NETWORK: $50k → 17%ECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE: $100k → 14%DEMOS: $35k → 17%DEMOCRACY INITIATIVE: $100k → 14%DETROIT BRANCH NAACP: $50k → 21%ECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE: $100k → 14%ECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE: $98k → 14%NATIONAL NEWSPAPER PUBLISHERS ASSC: $35k → 14%TRANSAFRICA FORUM: $25k → 14%DEMOCRACY INITIATIVE: $75k → 14%BUILDING BACK TOGETHER: $50k → 14%ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS: $35k → 14%LABOR COUNCIL FOR LATIN AMERICAN: $30k → 14%DEMOCRATIC ATTORNEY'S GENERAL: $100k → 14%DEMOCRATIC ATTORNEY'S GENERAL: $50k → 14%DEMOCRATIC ATTORNEY'S GENERAL: $50k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
MI
NY
NV
OH
PA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
TN
NC
DC
MS
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

33%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 26 repeat orgs$4.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +71% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2023, 23 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
61

Total granted

$2.1M
$4.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%
+10%

Still filing today

81%
66%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
Civil RightsPublic BenefitEducationEmploymentCommunity ImprovementAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EP
    ECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE
    4× · 2018–2022 · $398k · revenue +117%
  • NS
    NC STATE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR & CONGRESS OF INDUSTRIAL ORG
    2× · 2020–2022 · $100k · revenue +77%
  • UF
    UNITED FARM WORKERS OF AMERICA
    4× · 2018–2022 · $60k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • DG
    DEMOCRATIC GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2022 · $2.0M
  • TG
    The Good Land Committee Inc
    one grant, 2020 · $500k
  • MA
    MICHIGAN AFL-CIO FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $300k · revenue -96%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Washington State Labor Council Afl-Cio

To protect and strengthen the rights and conditions of working people and their families.

—
2
Laborers International Union of State of Mi

Collective bargaining and representation

—
3
American Federation of Labor Ohio Afl-Cio

To advance middle class and working class values by promoting social and economic justice. we join together over 263,000 union members to make our voice heard in the policy and political arenas. the ohio afl-cio represents 1,787 local…

—
4
Laborers International Union of 341 Hcl

Union hall devoted to the betterment of members compensation and working conditions, to secure recognition of workers rights to engage in collective bargaining, and to promote the development and maintenance of on-the-job safety practices…

—
5
American Federation of Labor & Congress of Industrial Orgs

To organize all workers for the economic, moral and social advancement of their condition and status.

—
6
Cincinnati Afl-Cio Labor Council

The mission of the afl-cio is to improve the lives of working families, to bring economic justice to the workplace and social justice to our nation.

—
7
Afl-Cio Union Lawyers Alliance

Afl-cio union lawyers alliance was established to better the conditions of working men and women and their families by enhancing the quality of legal representation that is available to the afl-cio and the national and international unions…

—
8
Laborers International Union of North America - Local 1076

The local is a nonprofit organization established to represent its members in wage and fringe benefits matters in the construction industry. the local's primary areas of jurisdiction are oakland and livingston counties.

—
9
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 825ABCDRRH

The work of the union, as the representative of its members, is to provide for the continuous employment of labor, to bring about stable conditions in the industry, and to establish necessary procedures for resolutions of disputes between…

—
10
Laborers' International Union of North America

To improve working conditions and living standards of members through collective bargaining, education, training, and employee benefits.

—
11
University of Michigan

To represent and advocate for its member physicians.

—
12
LaborLab

LaborLab is a nonprofit watchdog dedicated to safeguarding workers rights to organize, win strong contracts, and build lasting collective power. Through strategic research, educational resources, and corporate accountability, we empower…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Farmworker Justice Fund Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ottawa Friendship House Work Activity Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

73 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 73 of the 90 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
69/73
Grantees still filing
44/73
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DEMOCRATIC GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION: $2,000,000 · OtherDEMOCRATIC GOVERNORS ASSOCIATIONThe Good Land Committee Inc: $500,000 · OtherThe Good Land Committee IncDETROIT BRANCH NAACP: $450,000 · OtherDETROIT BRANCH NAACPDEMOCRACY INITIATIVE: $325,000 · OtherDEMOCRACY INITIATIVEDEMOCRATIC ATTORNEYS GENERAL ASSOCIATION: $200,000 · Other+52 more: $1,682,500 · Other+52 moreECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE: $397,500 · Social ScienceMICHIGAN AFL-CIO FOUNDATION: $300,000 · EmploymentJEWISH LABOR COMMITTEE: $35,000 · EmploymentJOBS TO MOVE AMERICA: $25,000 · Employment+3 more: $17,500 · EmploymentLABOR COUNCIL FOR LATIN AMERICAN ADVANCEMENT: $60,400 · Civil RightsPRIDE AT WORK AFL-CIO: $40,000 · Civil RightsCONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · Civil RightsUnited States Hispanic Leadership Institute Inc: $26,000 · Civil RightsFair Elections Center: $25,000 · Civil RightsEQUALITY MICHIGAN: $15,000 · Civil RightsNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC: $10,000 · Civil RightsCONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS POLITICAL EDU CATION AND LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE: $10,000 · Civil Rights+2 more: $10,000 · Civil RightsWAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $72,012 · EducationTHE ROOSEVELT INSTITUTE: $40,000 · EducationGOOD JOBS FIRST: $25,000 · EducationJAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $24,000 · EducationPEGGY BROWNING FUND: $20,000 · EducationINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $10,000 · Education+1 more: $5,000 · EducationNATIONAL ACTION NETWORK INC: $50,000 · Public BenefitDEMOS A NETWORK FOR IDEAS AND ACTION LTD: $40,000 · Public BenefitINSTITUTE ON TAXATION AND ECONOMIC POLICY: $27,500 · Public BenefitCENTER FOR COMMUNITY CHANGE ACTION: $25,000 · Public BenefitCONGRESSIONAL PROGRESSIVE CAUCUS CENTER: $10,000 · Public Benefit+3 more: $15,000 · Public BenefitHome Means Nevada Inc HMN: $50,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$5,157,500Social Science$397,500Employment$377,500Civil Rights$226,400Education$196,012Public Benefit$167,500Housing & Shelter$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Good Land Committee Inc: $500,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE: $397,500 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetDEMOCRACY INITIATIVE: $325,000 over 3y, 83% of budgetNC STATE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR & CONGRESS OF INDUSTRIAL ORG: $100,000 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetONE FAIR WAGE ACTION INC: $75,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetWAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $72,012 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLABOR COUNCIL FOR LATIN AMERICAN ADVANCEMENT: $60,400 over 6y, 4.1% of budgetUNITED FARM WORKERS OF AMERICA: $60,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetONE WISCONSIN NOW INC: $50,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetBBT INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHome Means Nevada Inc HMN: $50,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetNATIONAL ACTION NETWORK INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOALITION OF BLACK TRADE UNIONISTS: $45,000 over 3y, 5.8% of budgetTHE ROOSEVELT INSTITUTE: $40,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPRIDE AT WORK AFL-CIO: $40,000 over 4y, 4.6% of budgetDEMOS A NETWORK FOR IDEAS AND ACTION LTD: $40,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH LABOR COMMITTEE: $35,000 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetNATIONAL NEWSPAPER PUBLISHERS ASSOCIATION INC: $35,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetOTSEGO COUNTY UNITED WAY INC: $30,000 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetCONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetINSTITUTE ON TAXATION AND ECONOMIC POLICY: $27,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetDETROIT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $26,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUnited States Hispanic Leadership Institute Inc: $26,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetCENTER FOR COMMUNITY CHANGE ACTION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGOOD JOBS FIRST: $25,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetROB MURPHY FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 63% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFair Elections Center: $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetJOBS TO MOVE AMERICA: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetJAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $24,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetBING YOUTH INSTITUTE: $20,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetPEGGY BROWNING FUND: $20,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetSIXTEEN THIRTY FUND: $19,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNION SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE: $17,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCONGRESSIONAL HISPANIC CAUCUS INSTITUTE INC: $17,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEQUALITY MICHIGAN: $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetUNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN LABOR ALLIANCE AFL -CIO: $15,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetMICHIGAN MINORITY PURCHASING COUNCIL D/B/A MMSDC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE ON CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS INC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetINTERNATIONAL LABOR RIGHTS FORUM: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCITIZENS TRADE CAMPAIGN: $10,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetCHRISTOPHER P GARDNER FOUNDATI: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOALITION OF LABOR UNION WOMEN: $10,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF DETROIT AND SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCONGRESSIONAL PROGRESSIVE CAUCUS CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communications Worker…American Federation o…American Federation o…United Food and Comme…International Brother…Unite HereNational Education As…International Brother…United Steel Paper an…International Union o…National Nurses UnitedInternational Union o…
Communications Workers of America Afl-Cio ClcDC56.6× affinity25 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communications Workers of America Afl-Cio Clc · American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees · American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations · United Food and Commercial Workers International Union · International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers · Unite Here · National Education Association of the United States · International Brotherhood of Teamsters · United Steel Paper and Forestry Rubber Manufacturing Energy Allied · International Union of Bricklayers & Allied Craftworkers · National Nurses United · International Union of Painters and Allied Trades

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Int Union United Auto National Community Action Program funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Int Union United Auto National Community Action Program. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Int Union United Auto National Community Action Program?

    Find your warmest path to Int Union United Auto National Community Action Program through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 90 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $1.7M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Int Union United Auto National Community Action Program’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home